The pkg_dup function shouldn't call any alpm_pkg_get_ accessors because
this can fill the old package with all INFRQ_DESC fields for example, and
this won't necessarily be reproduced in the new package (for all the fields
that were copied before).
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This vercmp issue has been a sticking point but this should resolve many of
the issues that have come up. Only a few minor code changes were necessary
to get the behavior we desired, and this version appears to beat any other
vercmp rendition on a few more cases added in this commit.
This commit passes all 58 vercmp tests currently out there. Other 'fixes'
still fail on a few tests, namely these ones:
test: ver1: 1.5.a ver2: 1.5 ret: -1 expected: 1
==> FAILURE
test: ver1: 1.5 ver2: 1.5.a ret: 1 expected: -1
==> FAILURE
test: ver1: 1.5-1 ver2: 1.5.b ret: 1 expected: -1
==> FAILURE
test: ver1: 1.5.b ver2: 1.5-1 ret: -1 expected: 1
==> FAILURE
4 of 58 tests failed
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Debug messages were removed from _alpm_sync_find, because it is a general
purpose function; debug messages should be placed in the caller function.
I inserted "adding package foo-1.0-1 to the transaction targets" debug
message to find_replacements and sync_sysupgrade.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Our STRDUP macro (used in _alpm_depmiss_new) is NULL safe.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
So if you want to remove NULL needle from a list, alpm_list_remove will
return with "not found".
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Before removing a package from target list (in remove_prepare_keep_needed),
we should check whether we have already removed it.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Commit 8240da6cb3 broke some alpm hierarchy
and introduced a new memleak (trans->packages was never freed in case of add
transaction, even if the transaction wasn't committed), so it is reverted
now.
We follow a different approach to reduce memory usage:
_alpm_db_add_pkgincache doesn't duplicate the whole package before adding
it to the cache, only the package name and version (INFRQ_BASE).
This method needs very small extra memory (compared to the reverted method),
and after transaction commit we use less memory than before (since the
big 'files' fields are not copied to cache), this is useful in GUIs.
Note: The old add_pkgincache was a bit broken, since pkg->origin wasn't
filled in correctly.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Acked-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In case of error some allocated memory wasn't freed in commit_single_pkg.
Note: The return value of this function is not used.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The dynamic pmconflict_t must be freed with _alpm_conflict_free.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Now '-S provision' handling is done in the back-end.
In case of multiple providers, the first one is selected (behavior change:
deleted provision002.py). The old processing order was: literal, group,
provision; the new one: literal, provision, group. This is more rational,
but "pacman -S group" will be slower now. "pacman -S repo/provision" also
works. Provision was generalized to dependencies, so you can resolve deps by
hand: "pacman -S 'bash>2.0'" or "pacman -S 'core/bash>2.0'" etc. This can be
useful in makepkg dependency resolving. The changes were documented in
pacman manual.
alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers and _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers functions were
removed, since they are no longer needed.
I added some verbosity to "select provider instead of literal" and
"fallback to group".
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
I divided resolvedeps into 2 functions. The new _alpm_resolvedep function
will resolve one dependency, for example the 'foo>=1.0-1' dependency. It
can be useful in sync_addtarget refactoring.
The resolvedeps parameters were changed, to be coherent with recursedeps:
* the target-list is an alpm_list* instead of alpm_list**. This is OK,
because alpm_list_add == alpm_list_add_last
* syncpkg param was removed. list contains the to-be-installed packages,
resolvedeps will add the required dependencies into this list
* trans param was removed, it was used in QUESTION() only, which can be used
on the main (handle->trans) transaction only (because the front-end cannot
access our pseudo-transactions at all!).
The patch fixes some wrong dynamic pmdepmissing_t usage.
I did a behavior change (and sync1003.py was modified accordingly), which
needs some explanation: The old resolvedeps didn't elect packages from
'remove' list. I've dropped this because I don't want that 2nd excluding
list param. In fact, in real life, we ~never need this rule. Resolvedeps is
called before checkconflicts, so only -Su's %REPLACES% packages are sitting
in 'remove' list. This means, that we have the replacement packages in our
target list. Usually "foo replaces bar" means, that bar isn't in our repos
any more, so resolvedeps *cannot* elect it; but usually it won't try it at
all, because foo is in the target list, and it is expected to satisfy
'bar>=1.0-1'-like dependencies too. Since checkdeps and checkconflicts is
done after resolvedeps, this cannot cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
PM_TRANS_CONV_INSTALL_IGNOREPKG callback function can get 2 params: foo, bar
in this order (packages), bar can be NULL.
Old API:
foo, NULL: Do you want to install foo from IgnorePkg?
foo, bar: foo requires bar from IgnorePkg. Do you want to install bar?
New API:
foo, bar: Do you want to install foo from IgnorePkg? (If bar!=NULL:) bar
requires it.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This function finds the first satisfier package in a pkglist. Using it
instead of _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers eliminates some memleaks and it is
faster. (_alpm_find_dep_satisfiers and _alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers will be
removed soon.)
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The function is introduced to kill some code duplication. The function name
uses the 'dependency graph' terminology.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is a "fix" for FS#10226. I think that multiple versioned dependencies
are quite common now, and the old behavior is quite annoying there. This
patch won't cause any slow-down.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We were using the stat() system call in quite a few places when we didn't
actually need anything the stat struct returned- we were simply checking for
file existence. access() will be more efficient in those cases.
Before (strace pacman -Ss pacman):
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
33.16 0.005987 0 19016 stat64
After:
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
34.85 0.003863 0 12633 1 access
7.95 0.000881 0 6391 7 stat64
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Some previous commits apparently broke the get_filename function for package
loaded with pkg_load (on a -Qip operation) because this field was no longer
filled. Now pkg_load fills it.
But the -Qip operation needs to be run like this : -Qip <filename>, so the
filename is already known. There is no need to display it again.
Besides, on a normal -Qi operation, the filename is not displayed either
because this information is not stored in the local database.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Errors like the following one happen regularly (for unknown reasons...) :
error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/local//glibc-2.7-9/depends: No
such file or directory
Anyway, every time an user reported an error like that, it always seemed
like he thought the error was caused by the double /, which is obviously
wrong.
Since db->path always include a trailing /, there is no need to add one when
concatenating paths in be_files.c or add.c.
Additionally, some static strings were switched to dynamic.
And the computation of the "dbpath"/"pkgname"-"pkgversion" was refactored
in db_read, db_write and db_remove with a get_pkgpath static function.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Add a new totaldlcb callback function to libalpm and make pacman utilize it
when the TotalDownload option is enabled. This callback function is pretty
simple- it is meant to be called once at the beginning of a "list download"
action, and once at the end (with value 0 to indicate the list has been
finished). The frontend is responsible for keeping track of adding
individual file download amounts to the total xfered amount in order to
display some sort of overall progress.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We have been using unsigned long as a file size type for a while, which
works but isn't quite correct and could easily break. Worse was probably our
use of int in the download callback functions, which could be restrictive
for packages > 2GB in size.
Switch all file size variables to use off_t, which is the preferred type for
file sizes. Note that at least on Linux, all applications compiled against
libalpm must now be sure to use large file support, where _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
is defined to be 64 or there will be some weird issues that crop up.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This was mistakenly referencing the LGPL even after the XySSL code bump, so
fix the license clause to be correct.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Commit 8428367285 introduced the regression,
and a previous commit introduced the vercmptest.sh test script to track down
these issues. This commit solves the problem by removing the previous
attempt at locating the pkgrel portions and replacing it with something that
performs the correct logic.
While tracking down everything I needed to, I also found a mistake in one of
the pactests which is fixed here as well as increased the functionality and
verbosity of the vercmptest script to both print out each test it is running
as well as automatically run the mirror of each test case.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Removed unused handle->uid from pmhandle_t. The need to check permissions
should be determined by the frontend (and is in pacman).
Fixed comment on noextract in pmhandle_t.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <mcrae_allan@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This event was unused, was missing the equivalent EXTRACT_DONE event, and
was useless because we already have ADD / UPGRADE START and DONE events.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
repo-add and db_read both assume that REPLACES and FORCE fields are in the
desc file, so do that for db_write as well (instead of depends file).
Note that db_write is currently only used on the local database. And the
only purpose of replaces and force in local database is for information
purpose (available on -Qi operations). So this is not a big problem.
Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-May/011859.html
Acked-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Name and version are computed from "/var/lib/pacman/..." pathname. And the
%NAME% and %VERSION% fields from the desc file were not even read. So now,
when we read the desc file, we make sure the %NAME% and %VERSION% fields are
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In the case of -Rs operation, first pulling the dependencies with
recursedeps before calling checkdeps takes care of the dependency chain of
remove052 pactest.
In the case of -Rcs, we can keep the old behavior because we have no problem
there (any dependency returned by checkdeps will be added to the remove list
because of -Rc) and we have to run recursedeps on the final remove list
anyway to catch all orphans.
Ref.: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-April/011569.html
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
