This will allow us to eventually combine the depends and desc entries
within the sync database.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
When a -Sk or -Uk operation induced a removal of an existing local
package, --dbonly was not in effect and the files were all removed.
Fixing this behavior was already marked as TODO in database012 pactest
------------
TODO: I honestly think the above should NOT delete the original les, it
hould upgrade the DB entry without touching anything on the file stem.
E.g. this test should be the same as:
pacman -R --dbonly dummy && pacman -U --dbonly dummy.pkg.tar.gz
------------
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
[Dan: small coding style touchup]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Either we expose all low levels function dealing with pmdepend_t
(splitdep and depfree come to mind), or we don't.
Since none of the tools use depcmp, I chose to remove it. In the future,
we might want to expose higher level functions such as
alpm_find_satisfier, or just lower level functions like splitdep and
depfree together with depcmp.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This has been replaced by the more flexible alpm_find_satisfier
function, and alpm_deptest was completely unsused now.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
whatprovides and splitdep were removed, so depcmp alone is quite useless
now without splitdep, and deptest is not flexible enough.
Introduce a new alpm_find_satisfier which is hopefully more flexible,
this should make implementation of deptest very easy, and also help alpm
tools such as pactree.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This patch is only meant for 3.4.x. It prepares the place for the future
epoch-aware release.
All force packages that get reinstalled or upgraded will get an EPOCH
entry in the local database, and thus the new pacman with epoch won't
reinstall them by mistake on the first -Su.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
If we have a corrupted database, a package can come through without an arch,
causing the code to blow up when making strcmp() calls. It might even be
possible with perfectly valid database entries lacking an 'arch =' line.
This behavior was seen as at least one of the problems in FS#21668.
Ensure pkgarch is not null before doing anything further.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
$ pacman -Rd kde-meta
Remove (15): kde-meta-kdewebdev-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdeutils-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdetoys-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdesdk-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdeplasma-addons-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdepim-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdenetwork-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdemultimedia-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdegraphics-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdegames-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdeedu-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdebase-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdeartwork-4.5-1 [0.00 MB] kde-meta-kdeadmin-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
kde-meta-kdeaccessibility-4.5-1 [0.00 MB]
Total Removed Size: 0.06 MB
Do you want to remove these packages? [Y/n]
( 1/15) removing kde-meta-kdewebdev [------------------------] 100%
$ it stopped here..
On one side, libalpm did not initialize the progress bar at 0 percent.
So with meta-packages that have 0 files, there was only one progress bar
call with percent == 100.
On the other side, pacman callback kept track of the last percent that
it received. When there are only meta-packages, we always received only
100, so pacman believed the progress bar needed not update. Thus only
the first package was actually displayed.
A proper fix for the callback would be to keep track of last package
name to make sure the recorded prev percent applies.
But since we now specify that both Add and Remove should at least send
percent=0 at beginning and percent=100 at the end, there is no need
for that.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We still need to read force entry in epoch-aware pacman, so that when we
install an old force package, EPOCH gets written to the local db.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This will allow for better control of what was previously the 'force' option
in a PKGBUILD and transferred into the built package.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Remove unnecessary parsing of fields not found in local desc files.
Leave %FORCE% parsing as this likely will make an appearance in desc
files in the future.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
The splitname function is a general utility function and so is better
suited to util.h. Rename it to _alpm_splitname to indicate it is an
internal libalpm function as was the case prior to splitting local and
sync db handling.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
These functions are only needed by be_local and were only promoted
to db.{h,c} as part of the splitting of handling the local and sync
dbs. Move them into be_local.c and make them static again.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Read in list of packages for sync db from tar archive.
Breaks reading in _alpm_sync_db_read and a lot of pactests (which
is expected as they do not handle sync db in archives...).
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Put the db_operations struct to use and completely split the handling
of the sync and local databases.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
The file be_files.c is "split" to be_local.c and be_sync.c in order
to achieve separate handling of sync and local databases.
Some basic clean-up of functions that are only of use for local or
sync databases has been performed and some rough function renaming
in duplicated code has been performed to prevent compilation errors.
However, most of the clean-up and final separation of sync and local
db handling occurs in following patches.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
These will be needed for the handling of both local and sync database
caches, so put them in a common location.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Move splitname, checkdbdir, get_pkgpath into db.{h,c} as these will be
needed to parse both the local and sync databases during the initial
splitting. They will be moved out of db.{h,c} at to more appropriate
locations at a later stage.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
It doesn't do a whole lot yet, but these type of operations will
potentially be different for the DBs we load.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Cache bullshit only has relevance to be_files, so move it there.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
[Allan: BIG rebase]
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Hopefully we've finally arrived at package handling nirvana, or at least
this commit will get us a heck of a lot closer. The former method of getting
the depends list for a package was the following:
1. call alpm_pkg_get_depends()
2. this method would check if the package came from the cache
3. if so, ensure our cache level is correct, otherwise call db_load
4. finally return the depends list
Why did this suck? Because getting the depends list from the package
shouldn't care about whether the package was loaded from a file, from the
'package cache', or some other system which we can't even use because the
damn thing is so complicated. It should just return the depends list.
So what does this commit change? It adds a pointer to a struct of function
pointers to every package for all of these 'package operations' as I've
decided to call them (I know, sounds completely straightforward, right?). So
now when we call an alpm_pkg_get-* function, we don't do any of the cache
logic or anything else there- we let the actual backend handle it by
delegating all work to the method at pkg->ops->get_depends.
Now that be_package has achieved equal status with be_files, we can treat
packages from these completely different load points differently. We know a
package loaded from a zip file will have all of its fields populated, so
we can set up all its accessor functions to be direct accessors. On the
other hand, the packages loaded from the local and sync DBs are not always
fully-loaded, so their accessor functions are routed through the same logic
as before.
Net result? More code. However, this code now make it roughly 52 times
easier to open the door to something like a read-only tar.gz database
backend.
Are you still reading? I'm impressed. Looking at the patch will probably be
clearer than this long-winded explanation.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
[Allan: rebase and adjust]
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Implement this seemingly simple change in package.h:
typedef enum _pmpkgfrom_t {
- PKG_FROM_CACHE = 1,
- PKG_FROM_FILE
+ PKG_FROM_FILE = 1,
+ PKG_FROM_LOCALDB,
+ PKG_FROM_SYNCDB
} pmpkgfrom_t;
which requires flushing out several assumptions from around the codebase
with regards to usage of the PKG_FROM_CACHE value. Make some changes where
required to allow the switch, and now the correct value should be set (via a
crude hack) depending on whether a package was loaded as an entry in a local
db or a sync db.
This patch underwent some big rebasing from Allan and Dan.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Move almost all of the caching related stuff into a single #define
(which should maybe even just be a static function) so we don't
duplicate logic all over the place. This also makes the code a heck of a
lot shorter and means further changes to this stuff don't have to touch
each and every getter function.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us not to write
it out to our local database. Adding this now will help ease the upgrade
path for epoch later and not require reinstallation of all force packages.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
On Linux and OS X, we can determine if an entry obtained through a readdir()
call is a directory without also having to stat it. This can save a
significant number of syscalls. The performance increase isn't dramatic, but
it could be on some platforms (e.g. Cygwin) so it shouldn't hurt to use this
unconditionally where supported.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
I don't know what I tested in commit 3e7b90ff69, but it definitely wasn't
working as advertised. Fix the checks in the source code itself to match the
right define (HAVE_LIBFETCH), as well as make sure the configure check
defaults to looking for the library but not bailing if it could not be
found.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
It touched up these a bit after it ran, so might as well check the changes
in so we don't have to deal with them again later.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Model it after the new OpenSSL check, and have it be a bit more useful. If
you do not explicitly pass a command line option, it will be linked if
available but will not error out if it is missing. Also bump the version to
that where connection caching was introduced as we use these new features in
the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
I've noticed my Atom-powered laptop is dog-slow when doing integrity checks
on packages, and it turns out our MD5 implementation isn't near as good as
that provided by OpenSSL. Using their routines instead provided anywhere
from a 1.4x up to a 1.8x performance benefit over our built-in MD5 function.
This does not remove the MD5 code from our codebase, but it does enable
linking against OpenSSL to get their much faster implementation if it is
available on whatever platform you are using. At configure-time, we will
default to using it if it is available, but this can be easily changed by
using the `--with-openssl` or `--without-openssl` arguments to configure.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This gave at least a 10% improvement on a few tested platforms due to the
reduced number of read calls from files when computing the md5sum. It really
is just a precursor to another patch to come which is to use MD5 functions
that do the job a lot better than anything we can do.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is being checked in as 'pt' rather than 'pt_PT' as that is what
Transifex seems to want, and it is also the dominant choice of packages
already installed on my system when doing a count of the files located in
the /usr/share/locale translation directories.
Thanks for the new translation!
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
