xeps/xep-0458.xml

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE xep SYSTEM 'xep.dtd' [
	<!ENTITY % ents SYSTEM 'xep.ent'>
%ents;
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='xep.xsl'?>
<xep>
	<header>
		<title>Community Code of Conduct</title>
		<abstract>
			This document describes the XMPP Standard Foundation's Code of Conduct
		</abstract>
		&LEGALNOTICE;
		<number>0458</number>
		<status>Experimental</status>
		<type>Procedural</type>
		<sig>None</sig>
		<approver>Board</approver>
		<dependencies/>
		<supersedes/>
		<supersededby/>
		<shortname>N/A</shortname>
		&dcridland;
  <revision>
    <version>0.2.1</version>
    <date>2023-07-12</date>
    <initials>egp</initials>
    <remark><p>Add anchors to every section, for easier linking.  Also fix a typo.</p></remark>
  </revision>
  <revision>
    <version>0.2.0</version>
    <date>2021-06-29</date>
    <initials>dwd</initials>
    <remark>Integrate various comments from various sources</remark>
  </revision>
  <revision>
    <version>0.1.0</version>
    <date>2021-06-10</date>
    <initials>XEP Editor (jsc)</initials>
    <remark>Accept as Experimental after unanimous approval by Board of the ProtoXEP draft for discussion within the community.</remark>
  </revision>
  <revision>
    <version>0.0.1</version>
    <date>2021-06-01</date>
    <initials>dwd</initials>
    <remark>And so it began.</remark>
  </revision>
	</header>
	<section1 topic='Introduction' anchor='intro'>
		<p>The XMPP Standards Foundation provides a number of venues, both physical and virtual, for discussion
			and community activity. These include mailing lists, chatrooms, Summits, and so on. It also
			produces much output designed for the general public, such as the XEPs themselves, the website,
			and kiosks or stands at actual events. Collectively, these are the XMPP Standards Foundation
			Activities.</p>
		<p>The Members of the Foundation, and the wider community of participants in the XSF Activities, are
			diverse in viewpoints and goals. We see this as a benefit - we wish the maximize the
			applicability and quality of our protocols, and therefore we wish to maximize the pool of
			potential participants who might offer their unique viewpoints and help us reach new goals.</p>
		<p>It makes sense that there is a Code of Conduct that applies to the behaviour we expect both of
			ourselves and any other community members when participating in discussions or producing that
			public output.</p>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='The Code of Conduct' anchor='conduct'>
			<section2 topic="Welcome" anchor='welcome'>
				<p>You are welcome. Ensure that you are also welcoming. We want
				everyone to feel welcome no matter what the colour of their skin, where they live,
				or where their ancestors came from. We want to welcome people from all
				cultures, and religions, and of all sizes and shapes. We want people to be welcome no
				matter their sexual identity or orientation. We want you to feel welcome no matter your
				level of experience or ability. And we want you to help us make everyone else feel
				welcomed, too.</p>
			</section2>
		<section2 topic="Assume Good Faith" anchor='assume-good-faith'>
			<p>We are a diverse community, working often to multiple goals. We
				assume the best intent from each other, and do not ascribe malice. Assume that if
				someone is complaining about your conduct, it is because they either genuinely feel it
				is exclusionary to them, or they genuinely believe it is exclusionary to others - in the
				first instance, take it as a learning experience, correct your conduct and move on. If
				possible, assume, too, that bad conduct from others may derive from a misunderstanding
				or a lack of that learning experience rather than a deliberate attempt to exclude - in
				the first instance, correct them and move on. Do not, however, use this as an excuse for
				bad conduct or a reason to ignore it.</p>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Pick Your Words" anchor='pick-your-words'>
			<p>A small amount of effort in ensuring your words are
				professional and polite, and avoiding subjects and expressions that may offend, goes a
				long way. Humour is not a mitigating factor here.</p>
			<p>It's often useful to limit your comments to the point you wish to make if you're unsure.</p>
			<p>Examples of what to avoid:</p>
				<ul>
					<li>Racist language, whether intentional or not.</li>
					<li>Threats of violence, or violent language directed against someone else.</li>
					<li>Sexually explicit imagery, language, or behaviour.</li>
				</ul>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Be Respectful" anchor='be-respectful'>
				<p>Disagreements are normal and common. Sometimes, the different goals we
				have in our shared endeavour conflict, and it is important that we are able to explain
				why. Criticism is essential to find the best solutions to the problems that face us.
				However, it is vital that while we are open and honest in our criticism, we do so with
				the calm respect we expect of others.</p>
			<ul>
				<li>Try to be open over your point of view, intent and
				interests when expressing critique: this helps to discuss the different
					points of view in a constructive way.</li>
				<li>Try phrasing comments as an invitation to explore an issue.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>Examples of what to avoid:</p>
			<ul>
				<li>Personal insults.</li>
				<li>Ad-hominem attacks.</li>
			</ul>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Be Friendly and Supportive" anchor='be-friendly-and-supportive'>
			<p>We are, fundamentally, a community of people working to
				share technology with each other. We should be friendly toward each
				other, and act to support each other's efforts.</p>
			<p>Examples of what to avoid</p>
			<ul>
				<li>Impersonation of other people (copying their nickname, avatar, and so on).</li>
				<li>Privacy breaches, including doxxing etc.</li>
				<li>Unwelcome sexual attention.</li>
				<li>Encouraging poor behaviour in others.</li>
				<li>Harassing others.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>As a rule of thumb, if you find yourself dividing the community into an
				"us" and a "them", you are risking breaking this Code of Conduct.</p>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="About the Examples" anchor='about-the-examples'>
			<p>The examples in this document of what not to do are intended to be just that - examples.
				They are not intended to be exhaustive. Many of these examples have formal definitions,
				either in law or elsewhere - in general, if you are reliant on such a definition to
				argue why your behaviour might be acceptable, you have already lost the argument. </p>
			<p>Instead, please try to follow the spirit of this document, perhaps more so than its
				words.</p>
		</section2>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic="Governing Principles" anchor='governing-principles'>
		<p>The governing principle of this Code of Conduct is that all participation in XSF Activities is
			solely by permission of the XMPP Standards Foundation. No person has any automatic right to join
			a XSF chatroom or mailing list, or contribute to XSF documents such as the XEP series.</p>
		<p>Ordinarily, the XMPP Standards Foundation welcomes and encourages
			participation in XSF Activities, but this guiding principle allows the XSF to partially or
			completely exclude anyone from any activity, for any reason.</p>
		<p>The final decision on such exclusions is made by the Board, who may from time to time appoint a Work
			Team, called the Conduct Team, to act on their behalf. If the Work Team has not been appointed,
			the Conduct Team is the Board.</p>
		<p>There are exceptions to this - in particular any right of elected members of the
			Foundation under the Bylaws cannot be curtailed by the Board, though the Board
			(or any other any member) could start the process to eject a member. This means
			that members are trusted by the other members to a higher degree than other
			participants; something that should be considered during elections.</p>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='Who This Applies To' anchor='who'>
		<p>This Code of Conduct applies to anyone who:</p>
		<ul>
			<li>Acts in a capacity which could reasonably be expected to be acting on behalf of the
				XMPP Standards Foundation or the wider XMPP Community.</li>
			<li>Participates in any XSF Activity.</li>
		</ul>
		<section2 topic="Acting in a capacity" anchor='acting-in-capacity'>
			<p>The first case may seem extremely broad. The intent here is that while good behaviour which
				might be associated with the XSF and its community reflects well on us, the opposite is
				also true. By explicitly stating that this Code of Conduct applies this allows the XSF
				to sanction bad behaviour outside of XSF Activities should the need arise.</p>
			<p>Note also that this is not intended to mean that any XMPP developer's behaviour will be
				scrutinised constantly - using, for example, racist language in a talk about your XMPP
				project would be problematic here, but using sexualised language in your erotic fiction
				hobby is likely to be irrelevant to this Code of Conduct.</p>
			<p>However, higher standards may be applied to those seen as representative of the community,
				such as Members and in particular members of Board or Council.</p>
		</section2>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='How We Handle Bad Conduct' anchor='enforcement'>
		<section2 topic="Reporting" anchor='reporting'>
			<p>If you witness bad conduct by somebody - that is, if you feel someone's behaviour does not
				live up to this Code of Conduct - please do express your concern (calmly and gently) to that
				person at the time, but only if you feel able. This allows the person to recognise their behaviour
				may be problematic an correct it at the time without undue escalation. If you feel uncomfortable
				to do so that is perfectly fine and will not affect further handling of the incident.</p>
			<p>Whether or not you called it out, do one of the following:</p>
			<ul>
				<li>Let the Conduct Team know.</li>
				<li>Let the Board know.</li>
				<li>Let at least one member of the Board, and preferably more, know.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>Who you report it might depend on who was involved in the incident - you
				may feel that members of the Conduct Team or the Board were involved or present and wish
				to report to others.</p>
			<p>It may also be in some cases people may prefer to report informally; while
				reporting "properly" is preferred, the Conduct Team should strive to handle
				informal reports in the same way if possible.</p>
			<p>Importantly, even if someone else called it out or said to you they would report it, report
				it anyway. This ensures the Conduct Team have a clear understanding of what happened and who
				saw the conduct, and allows the Conduct Team to identify any longer term patterns.</p>
			<p>When you report it, include the place, date and time, and report it as calmly as
				possible.</p>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Consideration" anchor='consideration'>
			<p>The Conduct Team will then discuss the incident. This should be done quickly, and in private.</p>
			<p>The Conduct Team may ask for further information from you, the person accused of bad conduct,
				or others who were present.</p>
			<p>Finally, the Conduct Team will make a decision on sanctions or other action.</p>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Sanctions and Actions" anchor='sanctions-and-actions'>
			<p>The purpose of a Code of Conduct is to ensure our community is as
				welcoming and inclusive as possible. Sanctions are by their nature exclusionary,
				and many Actions are unlikely be to welcoming to those involved. Therefore the
				Conduct Team must consider how to ensure the Actions they take and the
				Sanctions they impose resolve the concerns proportionally, balancing the
				needs of the community with the individuals that form it, with the goal of
				maximizing inclusion and promoting positive behaviours.</p>
			<p>The Conduct team will normally have its authority to make decisions delegated to it
				by the Board. In some cases the Conduct Team may choose to hand its recommendation on
				Sanctions or other Actions to the Board even if authority has not been delegated. The Board
				will discuss and vote on these "in camera" (ie, not in public and not minuted).</p>
			<p>Finally, the result will normally be explained to the person accused on bad conduct, and may
				be explained to the complainant.</p>
			<p>Any announcement of Actions or Sanctions is an Action in and of itself, and should be considered
				carefully. In general terms, any announcement should be proportionate to the bad conduct and the size of
				the audience which witnessed it. In high profile cases, therefore, the Conduct Team may decide
				the result will be announced publicly in order to restore trust.</p>
			<p>Sanctions may consist of having the ability to participate reduced or removed from some or
				all XSF Activities. Actions may include discussion with the Conduct Team. These are
				non-exhaustive.</p>
			<p>Many minor incidents will, therefore, not be reported publicly at all, and - even if there is
				an agreement that bad conduct occurred - may not result in any visible actions at all.</p>
		</section2>
		<section2 topic="Appeal" anchor='appeal'>
			<p>If you disagree with the decision made by the Board and you were either the subject of bad
				conduct or subject to the actions or sanctions, you may appeal in writing by sending an
				email to the Board. The Board will consider your argument as written and will normally
				respond. The Board's decision after appeal is, however, final.</p>
		</section2>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='Security Considerations' anchor='security'>
		<p>It is possible for almost any behaviour to have some argument why it is not, in fact, exclusionary,
			and why it's just someone taking offence too easily. It also is possible for the Code of Conduct
			to be weaponised for exclusionary purposes, by using the complaints mechanism to stall or
			silence valid debate. Both of these are cases where the very existence of a Code of Conduct is
			used for exclusionary purposes, perverting its very intent. Obviously, don't do either.</p>
		<p>"Assume Good Faith", in particular, holds the risk of an endless argument over how far to go with
			that assumption, and where the burden lies - the phrasing is intended to minimize the wiggle
			room there.</p>
		<p>There are no simple answers to these concerns. Future Boards and Conduct teams are advised to be
			wary of both cases.</p>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='IANA Considerations' anchor='iana'>
		<p>This document has no considerations for IANA.</p>
	</section1>
	<section1 topic='XMPP Registrar Considerations' anchor='registrar'>
		<p>This document has no considerations for the XMPP Registrar.</p>
	</section1>
</xep>