Update to XEP-0450 version 0.3.0 and apply consistent formatting:
* Update ATM's namespace to 'urn:xmpp:atm:1'
* Apply consistent formatting for revision history
Improve examples and apply consistent formatting:
* Replace wrong recipient in example by 'alice@example.org'
* Use recipient 'bob@example.com' in examples consistently
* Apply consistent formatting for revision history
Update to XEP-0420 version 0.4.0 and XEP-0434 version 0.5.0:
* Replace SCE's old 'content' element by its new 'envelope' element
* Replace SCE's old 'payload' element by its new 'content' element
* Update SCE's namespace to 'urn:xmpp:sce:1'
* Update TM's namespace to 'urn:xmpp:tm:0'
* Update namespace to 'urn:xmpp:atm:1'
Update to XEP-0420 version 0.4.0 and adapt namespace to shortname:
* Replace SCE's old 'content' element by its new 'envelope' element
* Replace SCE's old 'payload' element by its new 'content' element
* Update SCE's namespace to 'urn:xmpp:sce:1'
* Change namespace to 'urn:xmpp:tm:0'
In case the XEP has not yet a shortname assigned, the transformation
would add a superfluous line break in the postfix due a missing
<xsl:text> element.
Add usage of Trust Message URIs, use more precise sentences, apply consistent formatting:
* Add usage of Trust Message URIs for initial authentications
* Use 'that' instead of 'which' for restrictive clauses
* Apply consistent formatting for paragraphs and revision history
Add new section, use more precise sentences, apply consistent formatting:
* Add new section for Trust Message URIs
* Use 'that' instead of 'which' for restrictive clauses
* Apply consistent formatting for paragraphs and revision history
I am tired of seeing all those badly or misreferenced XEPs out
there. This produces a high-quality BibLaTeX entry that follows the
recommendations of the biblatex Package and
draft-carpenter-rfc-citation-recs-01 § 5.2 [1].
It also uses proper 'date' attribution, from the first date in the XEP
history to the date of the latest revision entry.
1: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-rfc-citation-recs-01#section-5.2
Don't remember why it did this here. There's another spot where it
removes longer stretches of whitespace. Doesn't trim leading or trailing
whitespace tho, but that's what breaks it here.
