mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps
synced 2024-11-24 10:12:19 -05:00
typos
git-svn-id: file:///home/ksmith/gitmigration/svn/xmpp/trunk@1052 4b5297f7-1745-476d-ba37-a9c6900126ab
This commit is contained in:
parent
d12936df3e
commit
fdf2c00681
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
|
|||||||
</iq>
|
</iq>
|
||||||
]]></example>
|
]]></example>
|
||||||
<p>The 'generation', 'ip', and 'port' attributes are REQUIRED. The 'ip' and 'port' attributes are self-explanatory. The 'generation' attribute provides a tracking mechanism for determining which version of this candidate is in force (this is useful if the candidate is redefined mid-stream, for example if the port is changed).</p>
|
<p>The 'generation', 'ip', and 'port' attributes are REQUIRED. The 'ip' and 'port' attributes are self-explanatory. The 'generation' attribute provides a tracking mechanism for determining which version of this candidate is in force (this is useful if the candidate is redefined mid-stream, for example if the port is changed).</p>
|
||||||
<p>Note: The "Raw UDP candidate" is the candidate that the entity has reason to believe will be most likely to succeed for that content type, and thus is equivalent to the "in-use" candidate as described in &ice;. <note>In older versions of XEP-0166, this was referrred to as the "default candidate".</note> This is not necessarily the entity's preferred address for communication, but instead is the "address most likely to succeed", i.e., the address that is assumed to be reachable by the vast majority of target entities. To determine reachability, the client needs classify ahead of time the permissiveness of the NAT or firewall it is behind, if any. It then SHOULD assign the Raw UDP candidate as follows, where the candidate types are as described in <cite>ICE</cite>:</p>
|
<p>Note: The "Raw UDP candidate" is the candidate that the entity has reason to believe will be most likely to succeed for that content type, and thus is equivalent to the "default" candidate as described in Section 4.1.3 of &ice;. This is not necessarily the entity's preferred address for communication, but instead is the "address most likely to succeed", i.e., the address that is assumed to be reachable by the vast majority of target entities. To determine reachability, the client needs classify ahead of time the permissiveness of the NAT or firewall it is behind, if any. It then SHOULD assign the Raw UDP candidate as follows, where the candidate types are as described in <cite>ICE</cite>:</p>
|
||||||
<table caption='Raw UDP Candidate Assignment'>
|
<table caption='Raw UDP Candidate Assignment'>
|
||||||
<tr>
|
<tr>
|
||||||
<th>NAT Type</th>
|
<th>NAT Type</th>
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user