From fdf2c00681a11e2c7e45ab3baffd6f699efc1039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Saint-Andre Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:59:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] typos git-svn-id: file:///home/ksmith/gitmigration/svn/xmpp/trunk@1052 4b5297f7-1745-476d-ba37-a9c6900126ab --- xep-0177.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xep-0177.xml b/xep-0177.xml index 4ec095bc..01249ff1 100644 --- a/xep-0177.xml +++ b/xep-0177.xml @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ ]]>

The 'generation', 'ip', and 'port' attributes are REQUIRED. The 'ip' and 'port' attributes are self-explanatory. The 'generation' attribute provides a tracking mechanism for determining which version of this candidate is in force (this is useful if the candidate is redefined mid-stream, for example if the port is changed).

-

Note: The "Raw UDP candidate" is the candidate that the entity has reason to believe will be most likely to succeed for that content type, and thus is equivalent to the "in-use" candidate as described in &ice;. In older versions of XEP-0166, this was referrred to as the "default candidate". This is not necessarily the entity's preferred address for communication, but instead is the "address most likely to succeed", i.e., the address that is assumed to be reachable by the vast majority of target entities. To determine reachability, the client needs classify ahead of time the permissiveness of the NAT or firewall it is behind, if any. It then SHOULD assign the Raw UDP candidate as follows, where the candidate types are as described in ICE:

+

Note: The "Raw UDP candidate" is the candidate that the entity has reason to believe will be most likely to succeed for that content type, and thus is equivalent to the "default" candidate as described in Section 4.1.3 of &ice;. This is not necessarily the entity's preferred address for communication, but instead is the "address most likely to succeed", i.e., the address that is assumed to be reachable by the vast majority of target entities. To determine reachability, the client needs classify ahead of time the permissiveness of the NAT or firewall it is behind, if any. It then SHOULD assign the Raw UDP candidate as follows, where the candidate types are as described in ICE:

NAT Type