wasn't being installed the first couple of times I ran `make install' after
changing sample.wgetrc. Added blank lines around the message and a "<Hit RETURN
to acknowledge>", and reworded the message to be a bit more clear.
* wget.texi (waitretry): Herold Heiko <Heiko.Herold@previnet.it>'s
new option was undocumented until now. Reworded the suggested documentation he
sent to the list.
download a single HTML document and all its constituents.
* po/*.{gmo,po,pot}: Regenerated after adding new options.
* po/hr.po: Hrvoje forgot '\n's on his translations of my altered messages,
causing msgfmt to balk and `make install' to fail.
* wget.texi (Recursive Retrieval Options): In -K description, added a link to
the discussion of interaction with -N.
(Recursive Accept/Reject Options): Did some alphabetizing and added descriptions
of new --follow-tags and -G / --ignore-tags options.
(Following Links): Changed "the loads of" to "loads of".
(Wgetrc Commands): Added descriptions of new follow_tags and ignore_tags
commands.
* html.c (idmatch): Implemented checking of my new --follow-tags and
--ignore-tags options.
* init.c (commands): Added comment reminding people adding new entries doing
allocation to add corresponding freeing in cleanup().
(commands): Added new followtags and ignoretags commands.
(cleanup): Free storage for new followtags and ignoretags.
* main.c: Use of "comma-separated list" was random -- normalized it. Did some
alphabetization. Added comments pointing out "Options without arguments" and
"Options accepting an argument" sections of long_options[]. Added new options
--follow-tags and -G / --ignore-tags. Added comment that Damir's --referer is
currently undocumented. Added comment that Heiko's --waitretry is partially
undocumented (mentioned in --help but not in wget.texi). Moved improperly
sorted 24, 129, and 'G' cases.
* options.h (struct options): Added new fields follow_tags and ignore_tags.
* wget.h: Added "#define EQ 0" so we can say "strcmp(a, b) == EQ".
is available via anonymous CVS and desirable features are being added, it's
quite possible for end-users to be getting their hands on development versions.
They may report bugs, so if we don't change the version number, we'll have to
continually followup the statement "I'm using version 1.5.3" with the question
"The FTP archive or the CVS source?" Better to just make this development
version have a unique number. Once we're ready to actually release the next
version, we can up the version from 1.5.3+dev to 1.5.4, or 1.6, or whatever it
turns out to be (depending on how much development gets done).
Also made minor updates (dates, email addresses) to wget.texi.
