This patch should avoid duplicated target names in the backend.
1. sync_loadtarget will return with PM_ERR_TRANS_DUP_TARGET when trying to
add a duplicated target
2. sysupgrade never pulls duplicated targets
3. resolvedeps won't pull duplicated targets anymore
A pulled list was introduced in sync_prepare to improve the
pmsyncpkg_t<->pmpkg_t list conversion by making it more direct.
Also replace sync1005 and sync1006 by the sync1008 pactest, which is
similar but more interesting (the provisions are dependencies instead of
explicit targets).
sync1005 didn't work as expected anyway. It was expecting that pacman
failed, and pacman indeed failed, but not for the good reason. It didn't
fail during the preparation step because of conflicting targets, but during
the commit step, because of a md5 error...
And sync1006 didn't pass and was not really worth fixing. We have already
enough failing pactests more important than these two.
sync1008 pass with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Its implementation was quite broken:
* add_loadtarget() might have silently filtered out some targets when
replacing an older version.
* This was used in sync.c to determine whether a target is implicit or not,
which is incorrect behavior. Before this patch we silently removed user
confirmed replacements; now we always warn on a replacement.
* remove001.py behavior was quite odd in adding same target 5 times to the
target list, we can change this behavior to be a failure.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Xav: changed remove001 pactest accordingly]
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
test_delta_md5sum and test_pkg_md5sum were simple wrappers to test_md5sum,
and only used once, so not very useful. I removed them.
Also, test_md5sum and alpm_pkg_checkmd5sum functions were a bit duplicated,
so I refactored them with a new _alpm_test_md5sum function in libalpm/util.c
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Remove what was a pretty weird abstraction in the libalpm backend. Instead
of parsing server URLs as we get them (of which we don't usually use more
than a handful anyway), wait until they are actually used, which allows us
to store them as a simple string list instead. This allows us to remove a
lot of code, and will greatly simplify the continuing refactoring of the
download code.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Add new stub functions that work by calling the existing (terrible) download
forreal function, which needs a serious overhaul. Hide the existing
functions and switch all former users to the new functions.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is the first in what will be a series of patches to clean up the
current download code in libalpm. Start by moving download code out of
server.c and into download.c.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
sync->newversion shouldn't be public at all, and internally we access it directly.
(Before pmsyncpkg_t clean-up the analogue of this field [type] was needed in replaces computation.)
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
This patch indroduces a new public alpm_sync_newversion, which scans for new
version of a package in sync repos.
Hopefully this will reduce code duplication in the future:
* check-for-pacman-new-version from front-end can be easier
* -Qu refactoring
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Fix for sync044.py and reason001.py.
Rename sync->data to sync->removes (alpm_list_t *)
Replace pmsynctype_t sync->type by pmpkgreason_t sync->newreason
The type field was set to UPGRADE or DEPEND or REPLACE.
Instead of using type = UPGRADE or DEPEND, we now rather use a
"pmpkgreason_t newreason" field directly (= explicit or depend) which allows
a better handling of the install reason.
And the REPLACE type is now deduced implicitly when the sync->removes list
is not empty.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* eliminate asymmetry (innerconflict vs. outerconflict)
* fix a memleak (in case of PM_ERR_MEMORY deps wasn't freed)
* fix wrong pmconflict_t duplication (*retconflict = *conflict)
Note: the new code introduces some code duplication which shall disappear by
fixing FS#7524.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Remove unnecessary synclist_free function, and use our standard way
(alpm_list_free_inner + alpm_list_free) instead.
This slightly reduces code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The original patch from Nagy tried to resolve target vs target conflicts,
and so broke the following pactests : sync040, sync041 and sync990
Nagy's proposal to solve this situation was to choose the interactive way,
ask the user how to deal with it: either remove pkg1 or remove pkg2 or stop
here. So he left this as a TODO.
But instead of trying to resolve these conflicts or asking the user, I
tried to find a more conservative way, looking at what the current pactests
expected:
If between the two conflicting packages, one provides the other, pacman
will keep that one and remove the other from the target list. That breaks
sync893 and sync897. But Dan agreed these two looked weird and should be
changed.
This commit should close FS#8897, FS#8899 and FS#9024.
Reference:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009745.htmlhttp://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010393.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This function has a limited purpose, but might be interesting to do a
sanity check from a frontend (eg testdb).
Also removed the private _alpm_checkconflicts function to avoid confusion.
This function was used only once in libalpm, in sync.c, and was just a
single line anyway. Having to do it manually makes it explicit that we are
looking for two kind of conflicts (targ vs targ and db vs targ).
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Packages put in the sync->data field were always duplicated with pkg_dup,
and then freed, This is not needed.
Killing this duplication of packages made the memory usage during base
reinstall go from 10.4 MB to 8.1 MB.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Two functions defined in alpm.h were not marked with SYMEXPORT, causing
linking errors if they were used.
In addition, remove the incorrect use of the 'alpm_' prefix from an internal
function and replace it with '_alpm_'.
Fixes FS#9155.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This also affects all structures with static strings, such as depmiss,
conflict, etc. This should help a lot with memory usage, and hopefully make
things a bit more "idiot proof".
Currently our pactest pass/fail rate is identical before and after this
patch. This is not to say it is a perfect patch- I have yet to pull valgrind
out. However, this should be quite safe to use in all situations from here
on out, and we can start plugging the memleaks.
Original-work-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This reverts commit e28973169d.
This code might fit better in the frontend than in the backend finally.
Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-November/010150.html
I also changed it for fixing FS#8763 :
if there is exactly one provider, pacman will pull it and print a warning.
if there are several providers, pacman will list them and fail. It's up to
the user to pick one. Add sync501 pactest to reflect that.
Originally noticed in FS#9024, but was fixed in previous changes anyway.
However, it doesn't hurt to still check it.
Also add a pactest from Chantry Xavier for the original problem to ensure
we can't reproduce it.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Ugh, it was a pain to figure out why the Total Removed Size was showing up
wrong in the output of removed packages, but this was why- we used a stupid
_alpm_pkg_new call instead of just duping the package. Fix this. In the long
run, we really need to figure out better ways to not duplicate all this
package information.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Fixes FS#7380: alpm crashes on passing NULL to alpm_trans_commit in
a sync operation. Adds check that data parameter is not NULL in
several functions.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <mcrae_allan@hotmail.com>
[Dan: fix whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This will allow someone to install a group but ignore individual
packages inside the group.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Update the GPL boilerplate to direct people to the GNU website for a copy of
the license, as well as bump all of Judd's copyrights to 2007.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
alpm_list_find and alpm_list_find_ptr will now return a void *, and
alpm_list_find_str will return a char *, instead of an int.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
During a pacman operation such as a group install, pacman can ask several
questions such as "local version is up to date. Upgrade anyway?". They are
usually all answered either by yes or by no:
* yes when you want to reinstall all the targets.
* no when you only want to install the missing ones (either because you are
installing a group, or because you are copying a pacman -S line from wiki or
whatever).
So instead of asking this question for each target, it is now now configured
with a flag. Yes will be the default -S behavior, No will be achieved with
the --needed flag.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* memleak found by Nagy in checkdeps
* an useless line found by Nagy in resolvedeps
* data wasn't set to the missing dependencies in sync_prepare
* use the MALLOC macro in resolvedeps
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
checkdeps and resolvedeps now take both a remove list and an install list as
arguments, allowing dependencies to be calculated correctly.
This broke the sync990 pactest, but this pactest used dependencies and
provides in an unusual way, so it has been changed.
Dan: the sync990 pactest was just plain wrong. It didn't satisfy the
dependencies correctly, so should never have succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: some variable renaming, clarification in commit message]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* The frontend calls alpm_trans_prepare(&data), and in case of errors,
receive the missing dependencies / conflicts / etc in the data pointer.
It apparently needs to free this structure totally with :
alpm_list_free_inner(data, free)
alpm_list_free(data)
So I added alpm_list_free_inner(data, free) in
pacman/{sync.c,remove.c,add,c}
* in _alpm_sync_prepare, the deps and asked lists were not freed in case
of errors (unresolvable conflicts).
Besides the code for handling this case was duplicated.
* in _alpm_remove_commit, free was used instead of alpm_list_free for
newfiles.
* newline fix in pacman/sync.c
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
An alpm_list_free call was missing.
Also make use of alpm_list_free_inner in both _alpm_sync_free and
_alpm_trans_free.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The alpm_get_upgrades was exactly the same as find_replacements +
_alpm_sync_sysupgrade, except that it automatically made the eventual
replacements, without asking the user : Replace %s with %s/%s? [Y/n]
The replace question, asked in find_replacements. can now be skipped by
using a NULL trans argument, so that we get the same behavior as with
alpm_get_upgrades.
So alpm_db_get_upgrades() can now be replaced by
alpm_sync_sysupgrade(db_local, syncdbs).
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This patch introduces versioned provisions in "provision 1.0-1" format.
_alpm_db_whatprovides was modified accordingly (added sync500.py),
alpm_depcmp was modified accordingly (add043.py passes now; added add044.py
and add045.py).
Notes:
alpm_db_search now uses the whole versioned %PROVIDES% string in its search.
debug logging was simplified in alpm_depcmp.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Xavier: fixed a few typos, duplicate const strings with strdup before
modifying them, put some debugging back in alpm_depcmp, minor code cleanups
(var/function renaming), added a note in PKGBUILD man page.]
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: made strcmp checks clearer, added a comment]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
pmdepmissing_t was used for two totally different things :
missing dependencies, and dependency conflicts.
So this patch simply adds a type for dep conflicts,
and convert the code to use it.
This fix the TODO in conflict.c :
/* TODO WTF is a 'depmissing' doing indicating a conflict? */
Additionally, the code in conflict.c now eliminates the duplicated conflicts.
If pkg1 conflicts with pkg2, and pkg2 conflicts with pkg1, only one of them will be stored.
However the conflict handling in sync_prepare (sync.c) is still very asymetrical, and very ugly too.
This should be improved in the future (there is already a pending patch from Nagy that cleans it a lot).
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
And check the IgnorePkg handling is done correctly in the other places.
For example, -Qu and -Su will automatically skip the ignored packages (-Su will print a warning),
but -S will install ignored packages anyway, because it was asked explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
This file only contained one private function : _alpm_db_whatprovides .
And the public alpm_db_whatprovides was in db.c , so I moved everything there.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: updated POTFILES.in as well]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Instead of using the often-busted REQUIREDBY entries in the pacman database,
compute them each time they are required. This should help many things:
1. Simplify the codebase
2. Prevent future database corruption
3. Ensure when we do use requiredby, it is always correct
4. Shrink the pmpkg_t memory overhead
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The old code thought that alpm_db_whatprovides returns with a list of strings (package names).
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Setting this option will change the download progress to show the amount
downloaded, download rate, ETA, and download percent of the entire
download list rather than per each individual file.
The progress bar is still based on the completion of the current file
regardless if the TotalDownload option is set.
This closes FS#7205.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This option acts as if IgnorePkg was set on each package in the group.
This closes FS#1592.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
%d was used, which worked for Linux and FreeBSD. Not so for Darwin. The
warning was probably spat out when compiling on x68_64 as well, but no
developers use this architecture as their primary one.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
