mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/curl
synced 2024-11-13 21:15:08 -05:00
4d2f800677
Closes #6172
308 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
308 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing to the curl project
|
|
|
|
This document is intended to offer guidelines on how to best contribute to the
|
|
curl project. This concerns new features as well as corrections to existing
|
|
flaws or bugs.
|
|
|
|
## Learning curl
|
|
|
|
### Join the Community
|
|
|
|
Skip over to [https://curl.se/mail/](https://curl.se/mail/) and join
|
|
the appropriate mailing list(s). Read up on details before you post
|
|
questions. Read this file before you start sending patches! We prefer
|
|
questions sent to and discussions being held on the mailing list(s), not sent
|
|
to individuals.
|
|
|
|
Before posting to one of the curl mailing lists, please read up on the
|
|
[mailing list etiquette](https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html).
|
|
|
|
We also hang out on IRC in #curl on irc.freenode.net
|
|
|
|
If you're at all interested in the code side of things, consider clicking
|
|
'watch' on the [curl repo on github](https://github.com/curl/curl) to be
|
|
notified of pull requests and new issues posted there.
|
|
|
|
### License and copyright
|
|
|
|
When contributing with code, you agree to put your changes and new code under
|
|
the same license curl and libcurl is already using unless stated and agreed
|
|
otherwise.
|
|
|
|
If you add a larger piece of code, you can opt to make that file or set of
|
|
files to use a different license as long as they don't enforce any changes to
|
|
the rest of the package and they make sense. Such "separate parts" can not be
|
|
GPL licensed (as we don't want copyleft to affect users of libcurl) but they
|
|
must use "GPL compatible" licenses (as we want to allow users to use libcurl
|
|
properly in GPL licensed environments).
|
|
|
|
When changing existing source code, you do not alter the copyright of the
|
|
original file(s). The copyright will still be owned by the original creator(s)
|
|
or those who have been assigned copyright by the original author(s).
|
|
|
|
By submitting a patch to the curl project, you are assumed to have the right
|
|
to the code and to be allowed by your employer or whatever to hand over that
|
|
patch/code to us. We will credit you for your changes as far as possible, to
|
|
give credit but also to keep a trace back to who made what changes. Please
|
|
always provide us with your full real name when contributing!
|
|
|
|
### What To Read
|
|
|
|
Source code, the man pages, the [INTERNALS
|
|
document](https://curl.se/dev/internals.html),
|
|
[TODO](https://curl.se/docs/todo.html),
|
|
[KNOWN_BUGS](https://curl.se/docs/knownbugs.html) and the [most recent
|
|
changes](https://curl.se/dev/sourceactivity.html) in git. Just lurking on
|
|
the [curl-library mailing
|
|
list](https://curl.se/mail/list.cgi?list=curl-library) will give you a
|
|
lot of insights on what's going on right now. Asking there is a good idea too.
|
|
|
|
## Write a good patch
|
|
|
|
### Follow code style
|
|
|
|
When writing C code, follow the
|
|
[CODE_STYLE](https://curl.se/dev/code-style.html) already established in
|
|
the project. Consistent style makes code easier to read and mistakes less
|
|
likely to happen. Run `make checksrc` before you submit anything, to make sure
|
|
you follow the basic style. That script doesn't verify everything, but if it
|
|
complains you know you have work to do.
|
|
|
|
### Non-clobbering All Over
|
|
|
|
When you write new functionality or fix bugs, it is important that you don't
|
|
fiddle all over the source files and functions. Remember that it is likely
|
|
that other people have done changes in the same source files as you have and
|
|
possibly even in the same functions. If you bring completely new
|
|
functionality, try writing it in a new source file. If you fix bugs, try to
|
|
fix one bug at a time and send them as separate patches.
|
|
|
|
### Write Separate Changes
|
|
|
|
It is annoying when you get a huge patch from someone that is said to fix 511
|
|
odd problems, but discussions and opinions don't agree with 510 of them - or
|
|
509 of them were already fixed in a different way. Then the person merging
|
|
this change needs to extract the single interesting patch from somewhere
|
|
within the huge pile of source, and that creates a lot of extra work.
|
|
|
|
Preferably, each fix that corrects a problem should be in its own patch/commit
|
|
with its own description/commit message stating exactly what they correct so
|
|
that all changes can be selectively applied by the maintainer or other
|
|
interested parties.
|
|
|
|
Also, separate changes enable bisecting much better for tracking problems
|
|
and regression in the future.
|
|
|
|
### Patch Against Recent Sources
|
|
|
|
Please try to get the latest available sources to make your patches against.
|
|
It makes the lives of the developers so much easier. The very best is if you
|
|
get the most up-to-date sources from the git repository, but the latest
|
|
release archive is quite OK as well!
|
|
|
|
### Documentation
|
|
|
|
Writing docs is dead boring and one of the big problems with many open source
|
|
projects. But someone's gotta do it! It makes things a lot easier if you
|
|
submit a small description of your fix or your new features with every
|
|
contribution so that it can be swiftly added to the package documentation.
|
|
|
|
The documentation is always made in man pages (nroff formatted) or plain
|
|
ASCII files. All HTML files on the website and in the release archives are
|
|
generated from the nroff/ASCII versions.
|
|
|
|
### Test Cases
|
|
|
|
Since the introduction of the test suite, we can quickly verify that the main
|
|
features are working as they're supposed to. To maintain this situation and
|
|
improve it, all new features and functions that are added need to be tested
|
|
in the test suite. Every feature that is added should get at least one valid
|
|
test case that verifies that it works as documented. If every submitter also
|
|
posts a few test cases, it won't end up as a heavy burden on a single person!
|
|
|
|
If you don't have test cases or perhaps you have done something that is very
|
|
hard to write tests for, do explain exactly how you have otherwise tested and
|
|
verified your changes.
|
|
|
|
## Sharing Your Changes
|
|
|
|
### How to get your changes into the main sources
|
|
|
|
Ideally you file a [pull request on
|
|
github](https://github.com/curl/curl/pulls), but you can also send your plain
|
|
patch to [the curl-library mailing
|
|
list](https://curl.se/mail/list.cgi?list=curl-library).
|
|
|
|
Either way, your change will be reviewed and discussed there and you will be
|
|
expected to correct flaws pointed out and update accordingly, or the change
|
|
risks stalling and eventually just getting deleted without action. As a
|
|
submitter of a change, you are the owner of that change until it has been merged.
|
|
|
|
Respond on the list or on github about the change and answer questions and/or
|
|
fix nits/flaws. This is very important. We will take lack of replies as a
|
|
sign that you're not very anxious to get your patch accepted and we tend to
|
|
simply drop such changes.
|
|
|
|
### About pull requests
|
|
|
|
With github it is easy to send a [pull
|
|
request](https://github.com/curl/curl/pulls) to the curl project to have
|
|
changes merged.
|
|
|
|
We strongly prefer pull requests to mailed patches, as it makes it a proper
|
|
git commit that is easy to merge and they are easy to track and not that easy
|
|
to loose in the flood of many emails, like they sometimes do on the mailing
|
|
lists.
|
|
|
|
Every pull request submitted will automatically be tested in several different
|
|
ways. Every pull request is verified for each of the following:
|
|
|
|
- ... it still builds, warning-free, on Linux and macOS, with both
|
|
clang and gcc
|
|
- ... it still builds fine on Windows with several MSVC versions
|
|
- ... it still builds with cmake on Linux, with gcc and clang
|
|
- ... it follows rudimentary code style rules
|
|
- ... the test suite still runs 100% fine
|
|
- ... the release tarball (the "dist") still works
|
|
- ... it builds fine in-tree as well as out-of-tree
|
|
- ... code coverage doesn't shrink drastically
|
|
|
|
If the pull-request fails one of these tests, it will show up as a red X and
|
|
you are expected to fix the problem. If you don't understand when the issue is
|
|
or have other problems to fix the complaint, just ask and other project
|
|
members will likely be able to help out.
|
|
|
|
Consider the following table while looking at pull request failures:
|
|
|
|
| CI platform as shown in PR | State | What to look at next |
|
|
| ----------------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------- |
|
|
| CI / codeql | stable | quality check results |
|
|
| CI / fuzzing | stable | fuzzing results |
|
|
| CI / macos ... | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| Code scanning results / CodeQL | stable | quality check results |
|
|
| FreeBSD FreeBSD: ... | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| LGTM analysis: Python | stable | new findings |
|
|
| LGTM analysis: C/C++ | stable | new findings |
|
|
| buildbot/curl_winssl_ ... | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| continuous-integration/appveyor/pr | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| curl.curl (linux ...) | stable | all errors and failures |
|
|
| curl.curl (windows ...) | flaky | repetitive errors/failures |
|
|
| deepcode-ci-bot | stable | new findings |
|
|
| musedev | stable | new findings |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the tests fail due to a dependency service temporarily being offline
|
|
or otherwise unavailable, eg. package downloads. In this case you can just
|
|
try to update your pull requests to rerun the tests later as described below.
|
|
|
|
You can update your pull requests by pushing new commits or force-pushing
|
|
changes to existing commits. Force-pushing an amended commit without any
|
|
actual content changed also allows you to retrigger the tests for that commit.
|
|
|
|
When you adjust your pull requests after review, consider squashing the
|
|
commits so that we can review the full updated version more easily.
|
|
|
|
### Making quality patches
|
|
|
|
Make the patch against as recent source versions as possible.
|
|
|
|
If you've followed the tips in this document and your patch still hasn't been
|
|
incorporated or responded to after some weeks, consider resubmitting it to the
|
|
list or better yet: change it to a pull request.
|
|
|
|
### Write good commit messages
|
|
|
|
A short guide to how to write commit messages in the curl project.
|
|
|
|
---- start ----
|
|
[area]: [short line describing the main effect]
|
|
-- empty line --
|
|
[full description, no wider than 72 columns that describe as much as
|
|
possible as to why this change is made, and possibly what things
|
|
it fixes and everything else that is related]
|
|
-- empty line --
|
|
[Closes/Fixes #1234 - if this closes or fixes a github issue]
|
|
[Bug: URL to source of the report or more related discussion]
|
|
[Reported-by: John Doe - credit the reporter]
|
|
[whatever-else-by: credit all helpers, finders, doers]
|
|
---- stop ----
|
|
|
|
The first line is a succinct description of the change:
|
|
|
|
- use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
|
|
- don't capitalize first letter
|
|
- no dot (.) at the end
|
|
|
|
The `[area]` in the first line can be `http2`, `cookies`, `openssl` or
|
|
similar. There's no fixed list to select from but using the same "area" as
|
|
other related changes could make sense.
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to use commit --author="" if you commit someone else's work, and
|
|
make sure that you have your own user and email setup correctly in git before
|
|
you commit
|
|
|
|
### Write Access to git Repository
|
|
|
|
If you are a very frequent contributor, you may be given push access to the
|
|
git repository and then you'll be able to push your changes straight into the
|
|
git repo instead of sending changes as pull requests or by mail as patches.
|
|
|
|
Just ask if this is what you'd want. You will be required to have posted
|
|
several high quality patches first, before you can be granted push access.
|
|
|
|
### How To Make a Patch with git
|
|
|
|
You need to first checkout the repository:
|
|
|
|
git clone https://github.com/curl/curl.git
|
|
|
|
You then proceed and edit all the files you like and you commit them to your
|
|
local repository:
|
|
|
|
git commit [file]
|
|
|
|
As usual, group your commits so that you commit all changes at once that
|
|
constitute a logical change.
|
|
|
|
Once you have done all your commits and you're happy with what you see, you
|
|
can make patches out of your changes that are suitable for mailing:
|
|
|
|
git format-patch remotes/origin/master
|
|
|
|
This creates files in your local directory named NNNN-[name].patch for each
|
|
commit.
|
|
|
|
Now send those patches off to the curl-library list. You can of course opt to
|
|
do that with the 'git send-email' command.
|
|
|
|
### How To Make a Patch without git
|
|
|
|
Keep a copy of the unmodified curl sources. Make your changes in a separate
|
|
source tree. When you think you have something that you want to offer the
|
|
curl community, use GNU diff to generate patches.
|
|
|
|
If you have modified a single file, try something like:
|
|
|
|
diff -u unmodified-file.c my-changed-one.c > my-fixes.diff
|
|
|
|
If you have modified several files, possibly in different directories, you
|
|
can use diff recursively:
|
|
|
|
diff -ur curl-original-dir curl-modified-sources-dir > my-fixes.diff
|
|
|
|
The GNU diff and GNU patch tools exist for virtually all platforms, including
|
|
all kinds of Unixes and Windows:
|
|
|
|
For unix-like operating systems:
|
|
|
|
- [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/patch/](https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/patch/)
|
|
- [https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/](https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/)
|
|
|
|
For Windows:
|
|
|
|
- [https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.io/packages/patch.htm](https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.io/packages/patch.htm)
|
|
- [https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.io/packages/diffutils.htm](https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.io/packages/diffutils.htm)
|
|
|
|
### Useful resources
|
|
* [Webinar on getting code into cURL](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmZ3W1d6LQI)
|