mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps
synced 2024-11-23 01:32:22 -05:00
315 lines
16 KiB
XML
315 lines
16 KiB
XML
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
|
|
<!DOCTYPE xep SYSTEM '../xep.dtd' [
|
|
<!ENTITY % ents SYSTEM '../xep.ent'>
|
|
<!ENTITY BASE64 "<span class='ref'><link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4648'>BASE64</link></span> <note>RFC 4648: The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data <<link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4648'>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4648</link>>.</note>" >
|
|
<!ENTITY DATETIME "<span class='ref'><link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339'>DATETIME</link></span> <note>RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet Timestamps <<link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339'>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339</link>>.</note>" >
|
|
<!ENTITY XMLDSIG "<span class='ref'><link url='http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/'>XMLDSIG</link></span> <note>XML Signature Syntax and Processing, W3C Recommendation, 10 June 2008 <<link url='http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/'>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/</link>>.</note>" >
|
|
<!ENTITY E2EEncrypt "<span class='ref'><link url='http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-3923bis'>E2EEncrypt</link></span> <note>End-to-End Object Encryption for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), Miller, M. and P. Saint-Andre, work in progress <<link url='http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-3923bis'>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-3923bis</link>>.</note>" >
|
|
<!ENTITY rfc3920bis "<span class='ref'><link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-saintandre-rfc3920bis'>rfc3920bis</link></span> <note>RFC 3920: Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core <<link url='http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-saintandre-rfc3920bis'>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-saintandre-rfc3920bis</link>>.</note>" >
|
|
%ents;
|
|
]>
|
|
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../xep.xsl'?>
|
|
<xep>
|
|
<header>
|
|
<title>Digital Signatures in XMPP</title>
|
|
<abstract>This document provides a technical specification for Digital Signatures in the
|
|
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP).</abstract> &LEGALNOTICE;
|
|
<number>XXXX</number>
|
|
<status>Proto</status>
|
|
<type>Technical Specification</type>
|
|
<sig>Standards</sig>
|
|
<approver>Council</approver>
|
|
<dependencies>
|
|
<spec>XMPP Core</spec>
|
|
<spec>XEP-0001</spec>
|
|
</dependencies>
|
|
<supersedes/>
|
|
<supersededby/>
|
|
<shortname>N/A</shortname> &kdz; <revision>
|
|
<version>0.0</version>
|
|
<date>2010-03-10</date>
|
|
<initials>kdz</initials>
|
|
<remark>
|
|
<p>Proto-XEP draft.</p>
|
|
</remark>
|
|
</revision>
|
|
</header>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="Introduction" anchor="intro">
|
|
<p>This document provides a technical specification for Digital Signatures in Extensible
|
|
Messaging and Presence Protocol (&xmpp;) based upon End-to-End Object Encryption
|
|
(&E2EEncrypt;) "work in progress".</p>
|
|
<p>The S/MIME approach defined in &rfc3923; has never been implemented in XMPP clients to the
|
|
best of our knowledge, but has some attractive features, especially the ability to
|
|
store-and-forward a signed message at a user's server if the user is not online when the
|
|
message is received (in the XMPP community this is called "offline storage" and the message is
|
|
referred to as an "offline message"). The authors surmise that RFC 3923 has not been
|
|
implemented mainly because it adds several new dependencies to XMPP clients, especially MIME
|
|
(along with the CPIM and MSGFMT media types). This document explores the possibility of an
|
|
approach that is similar to but simpler than RFC 3923.</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
<section1 topic="Signing XMPP Stanzas" anchor="stanza">
|
|
<p>The process that a sending agent follows for securing stanzas is very similar regardless of
|
|
the form of stanza (i.e., <iq/>, <message/>, or <presence/>).</p>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>Constructs a cleartext version of the stanza, S.</li>
|
|
<li>Notes the current UTC date and time N when this stanza is constructed, formatted as
|
|
described in Section 5.</li>
|
|
<li>Converts the stanza to a UTF-8, as defined by &rfc3629;, encoded string, optionally
|
|
removing line breaks and other insignificant whitespace between elements and attributes,
|
|
i.e., UTF8-encode(S) = S'. We call S' a "stanza-string" because for purposes of signing and
|
|
verification it is treated not as XML but as an opaque string (this avoids the need for
|
|
complex canonicalization of the XML input).</li>
|
|
<li>Constructs a plaintext envelope (E) <plain/> qualified by the "urn:xmpp:signed:0"
|
|
namespace as follows: <ul>
|
|
<li>The attribute 'timestamp' set to the UTC date and time value N</li>
|
|
<li>The XML character data set to the base64-encoded form of S' (where the encoding
|
|
adheres to the definition in Section 4 of &BASE64; and where the padding bits are set to
|
|
zero). This encoding is necessary to preserve a canonicalized form of S'.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Converts the envelope (E) to a UTF-8 encoded string, optionally removing line breaks and
|
|
other insignificant whitespace between elements and attributes, i.e., E' =
|
|
UTF8-encode(E).</li>
|
|
<li>Produce a signature of UTF8-encoded envelope (E') using the intended signature algorithm.
|
|
T = signature(E'). (This step is underspecified and will be expanded upon in later revision
|
|
of this document.)</li>
|
|
<li>Base64-encodes T to produce the signature data T'.</li>
|
|
<li>Constructs an <signed/> element qualified by the "urn:xmpp:signed:0" namespace as
|
|
follows: <ul>
|
|
<li>The child element <signature> (implicitly qualified by the "urn:xmpp:signed:0"
|
|
namespace) as follows: <ul>
|
|
<li>The attribute 'algorithm' set to a string identifying the signature algorithm
|
|
used.</li>
|
|
<li>The XML character data T'.</li>
|
|
</ul></li>
|
|
<li>The child element <data> (implicitly qualified by the "urn:xmpp:signed:0"
|
|
namespace) as follows: <ul>
|
|
<li>The XML character data E'.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Sends the <signed> element as the payload of a stanza that SHOULD match the stanza
|
|
from step 1 in kind (e.g., <message/>), type (e.g., "chat"), and addressing (e.g.
|
|
to="romeo@montague.net" from="juliet@capulet.net/balcony"). If the original stanza (S) has a
|
|
value for the "id" attribute, this stanza MUST NOT use the same value for its "id"
|
|
attribute.</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
<section2 topic="Example of Signing Messages" anchor="ex-message">
|
|
<p>The sender begins with the cleartext version of the <message/> stanza "S":</p>
|
|
<example><![CDATA[
|
|
<message xmlns='jabber:client'
|
|
from='juliet@capulet.net/balcony'
|
|
id='183ef129'
|
|
to='romeo@montague.net'
|
|
type='chat'>
|
|
<thread>8996aef0-061d-012d-347a-549a200771aa</thread>
|
|
<body>Wherefore art thou, Romeo?</body>
|
|
</message>
|
|
]]></example>
|
|
|
|
<p>The sender then performs the steps 1 through 4 from above to generate:</p>
|
|
<example><![CDATA[
|
|
<plain xmlns="urn:xmpp:signed:0"
|
|
timestamp="2010-06-29T02:15:21.012Z">
|
|
PG1lc3NhZ2UgeG1sbnM9ImphYmJlcjpjbGllbnQiIGZyb209Imp1bGlldEBjYXB
|
|
1bGV0Lm5ldC9iYWxjb255IiB0bz0icm9tZW9AbW9udGVndWUubmV0IiB0eXBlPS
|
|
JjaGF0Ij48dGhyZWFkPmM2MzczODI0LWEzMDctNDBkZC04ZmUwLWJhZDZlNzI5O
|
|
WFkMDwvdGhyZWFkPjxib2R5PldoZXJlZm9yZSBhcnQgdGhvdSwgUm9tZW8/PC9i
|
|
b2R5PjwvbWVzc2FnZT4=
|
|
</plain>
|
|
]]></example>
|
|
<p>And then performs steps 5 through 9 steps, causing the following to be sent:</p>
|
|
<example><![CDATA[
|
|
<message xmlns='jabber:client'
|
|
from='juliet@capulet.net/balcony'
|
|
id='6410ed123'
|
|
to='romeo@montague.net'
|
|
type='chat'>
|
|
<signed xmlns="urn:xmpp:signed:0">
|
|
<signature algorithm="RSA-SHA1">
|
|
DxbxIziY1C1Ytcxkj0IFLsfmDLMv96JMlMAQZ7jh49IbsOIPsxI2LyLmqhKH/994UXDJKQLHvLJz
|
|
gAmw8V2b+zmyZeItJzSmB+HHiLFVXkD2Dd4JfetsafsfIcB7uNWg0gAeiKrTHfFgiyEC/2WxwOj3
|
|
JUMRyQ9ykEPIzS0GZ/k=
|
|
</signature>
|
|
<data>
|
|
PHBsYWluIHhtbG5zPSJ1cm46eG1wcDpzaWduZWQ6MCIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIyMDEwLTA2LTI5VDAy
|
|
OjE1OjIxLjAxMloiPgogIFBHMWxjM05oWjJVZ2VHMXNibk05SW1waFltSmxjanBqYkdsbGJuUWlJ
|
|
R1p5YjIwOUltcDFiR2xsZEVCallYQgogIDFiR1YwTG01bGRDOWlZV3hqYjI1NUlpQjBiejBpY205
|
|
dFpXOUFiVzl1ZEdWbmRXVXVibVYwSWlCMGVYQmxQUwogIEpqYUdGMElqNDhkR2h5WldGa1BtTTJN
|
|
emN6T0RJMExXRXpNRGN0TkRCa1pDMDRabVV3TFdKaFpEWmxOekk1TwogIFdGa01Ed3ZkR2h5WldG
|
|
a1BqeGliMlI1UGxkb1pYSmxabTl5WlNCaGNuUWdkR2h2ZFN3Z1VtOXRaVzgvUEM5aQogIGIyUjVQ
|
|
and2YldWemMyRm5aVDQ9CjwvcGxhaW4+Cg==
|
|
</data>
|
|
</signed>
|
|
</message>
|
|
]]></example>
|
|
|
|
</section2>
|
|
<section2 topic="Example of Securing IQs" anchor="ex-iq">
|
|
<p>To be added....</p>
|
|
</section2>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
<section1 topic="Interaction with Stanza Semantics" anchor="interact">
|
|
<p>The following limitations and caveats apply:</p>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>Undirected <presence/> stanzas SHOULD NOT be signed.</li>
|
|
<li>Stanzas directed to multiplexing services (e.g. multi-user chat) SHOULD NOT be signed,
|
|
unless the sender has established the service supports the handling of signed stanzas.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
</section1>
|
|
<section1 topic="Handling of Inbound Stanzas" anchor="inbound">
|
|
<p>Several scenarios are possible when an entity receives an encrypted stanza:</p>
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Case #1:</dt>
|
|
<dd>The receiving application does not understand the protocol.</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Case #2:</dt>
|
|
<dd>The receiving application understands the protocol and is able to verify the
|
|
signature.</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Case #3:</dt>
|
|
<dd>The receiving application understands the protocol and is able to verify the signature,
|
|
but the timestamps fail the checks specified under Checking of Timestamps.</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Case #4:</dt>
|
|
<dd>The receiving application understands the protocol and is unable to verify the
|
|
signature.</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
<p>In Case #1, the receiving application MUST do one and only one of the following: (1) ignore
|
|
the <signed/> extension, (2) ignore the entire stanza, or (3), except where precluded by
|
|
the protocol (&rfc3920bis;), return a <service-unavailable/> error to the sender.</p>
|
|
<p>In Case #2, the receiving application MUST NOT return a stanza error to the sender, since
|
|
this is the success case.</p>
|
|
<p>In Case #3, the receiving application MAY, except where precluded by the protocol, return a
|
|
<not-acceptable/> error to the sender, optionally supplemented by an
|
|
application-specific error condition element of <bad-timestamp/> as shown below:</p>
|
|
<example><![CDATA[
|
|
<message from='romeo@example.net/orchard'
|
|
id='6410ed123'
|
|
to='juliet@capulet.net/balcony'
|
|
type='error'>
|
|
<signed xmlns='urn:xmpp:signed:0'>
|
|
XML-character-data-here
|
|
</signed>
|
|
<error type='modify'>
|
|
<not-acceptable xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/>
|
|
<bad-timestamp xmlns='urn:xmpp:signed:0'/>
|
|
</error>
|
|
</message>
|
|
]]></example>
|
|
<p>In Case #4, the receiving application SHOULD, except as precluded by the protocol, return a
|
|
<bad-request/> error to the sender, optionally supplemented by an application-specific
|
|
error condition element of <bad-signature/> as shown below:</p>
|
|
<example><![CDATA[
|
|
<message from='romeo@example.net/orchard'
|
|
id='6410ed123'
|
|
to='juliet@capulet.net/balcony'
|
|
type='error'>
|
|
<e2e xmlns='urn:xmpp:signed:0'>
|
|
XML-character-data-here
|
|
</e2e>
|
|
<error type='modify'>
|
|
<bad-request xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/>
|
|
<bad-signature xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:xmpp-signed:0'/>
|
|
</error>
|
|
</message>
|
|
]]></example>
|
|
<p>Additionally in Case #4, the receiving application SHOULD NOT present the stanza to the
|
|
intended recipient (human or application) and SHOULD provide some explicit alternate
|
|
processing of the stanza (which may be to display a message informing the recipient that it
|
|
has received a stanza that cannot be verified).</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="Inclusion and Checking of Timestamps" anchor="timestamps">
|
|
<p>Timestamps are included to help prevent replay attacks. All timestamps MUST conform to
|
|
&DATETIME; and be presented as UTC with no offset, always including the seconds and fractions
|
|
of a second to three digits (resulting in a datetime 24 characters in length). Absent a local
|
|
adjustment to the sending agent's perceived time or the underlying clock time, the sending
|
|
agent MUST ensure that the timestamps it sends to the receiver increase monotonically (if
|
|
necessary by incrementing the seconds fraction in the timestamp if the clock returns the same
|
|
time for multiple requests). The following rules apply to the receiving application:</p>
|
|
|
|
<ul style="symbols">
|
|
<li>It MUST verify that the timestamp received is within five minutes of the current time,
|
|
except as described below for offline messages.</li>
|
|
<li>If the foregoing check fails, the timestamp SHOULD be presented to the receiving entity
|
|
(human or application) marked with descriptive text indicating "old timestamp" or "future
|
|
timestamp" and the receiving entity MAY return a stanza error to the sender (except as
|
|
precluded in the protocol).</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<p>The foregoing timestamp checks assume that the recipient is online when the message is
|
|
received. However, if the recipient is offline then the server will probably store the message
|
|
for delivery when the recipient is next online (offline storage does not apply to <iq/>
|
|
or <presence/> stanzas, only <message/> stanzas). As described in &xep0160;, when
|
|
sending an offline message to the recipient, the server SHOULD include delayed delivery data
|
|
as specified in &xep0203; so that the recipient knows that this is an offline message and also
|
|
knows the original time of receipt at the server. In this case, the recipient SHOULD verify
|
|
that the timestamp received in the encrypted message is within five minutes of the time
|
|
stamped by the recipient's server in the <delay/> element.</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="Mandatory-to-Implement Cryptographic Algorithms" anchor="mti">
|
|
<p>All implementations MUST support the following algorithms. Implementations MAY support other
|
|
algorithms as well.</p>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>TBD (RSA/SHA1? RSASSA-RKCS1-v1_5? RSASSA-PSS?)</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="Certificates" anchor="certs">
|
|
<p>To participate in end-to-end signing using the methods defined in this document, a client
|
|
needs to possess an X.509 certificate. It is expected that many clients will generate their
|
|
own (self-signed) certificates rather than obtain a certificate issued by a certification
|
|
authority (CA). In any case the certificate MUST include an XMPP address that is represented
|
|
using the ASN.1 Object Identifier "id-on-xmppAddr" as specified in Section 5.1.1 of
|
|
RFC 3920bis.</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="Security Considerations" anchor="security">
|
|
<p>TBD.</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
|
|
<section1 topic="XMPP Registrar Considerations" anchor="reg">
|
|
<section2 topic="XML Namespace Name for Signed Data in XMPP" anchor="ns">
|
|
<p>A URN sub-namespace of signed content for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
|
|
(XMPP) is defined as follows.</p>
|
|
<dl>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>URI:</dt>
|
|
<dd>urn:xmpp:signed</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Specification:</dt>
|
|
<dd>ProtoXEP</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Description:</dt>
|
|
<dd>This is an XML namespace name of signed content for the Extensible Messaging and
|
|
Presence Protocol as defined by ProtoXEP.</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
<di>
|
|
<dt>Registrant Contact:</dt>
|
|
<dd>XSF</dd>
|
|
</di>
|
|
</dl>
|
|
</section2>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
<section1 topic="Acknowledgements" anchor="ack">
|
|
<p>This document borrows ideas and text from End-to-End Object Encryption "work in progress" by
|
|
Matthew Miller and Peter Saint-Andre.</p>
|
|
</section1>
|
|
</xep>
|