%ents; ]>
Jingle File Transfer This specification defines a Jingle application type for transferring files between two entities. The protocol provides a modular framework that enables the exchange of information about the file to be transferred as well as the negotiation of parameters such as the transport to be used. &LEGALNOTICE; 0234 Experimental Standards Track Standards XMPP Core XEP-0096 XEP-0166 NOT YET ASSIGNED &stpeter; 0.2 2008-03-20 psa

Added transport negotiation scenario.

 0.1 2008-03-05 psa

Initial published version.

 0.0.3 2008-02-29 psa

Corrected use of content-replace action; specified that the In-Band Bytestreams transport method is mandatory-to-implement but must have the lowest preference order.

 0.0.2 2008-02-28 psa Modified negotiation flow to use new content-replace action. 0.0.1 2008-01-29 psa First draft.

&xep0096; defines the current XMPP protocol extension for file transfer. However, that protocol has several drawbacks, most related to the &xep0095; protocol on which it depends:

  1. It does not enable a true, bidirectional negotiation; instead, the initiator sets the terms for the file transfer and the receiver either accepts the terms or cancels the negotiation.
  2. It is the only technology in the Jabber/XMPP protocol "stack" that uses XEP-095: Stream Initiation. More modern technologies such as voice and video session negotiation use &xep0166;, and it would be helpful if implementors could use the same code for all negotiation use cases.

To overcome these drawbacks, this specification defines a file transfer negotiation method that meets the following requirements:

This section provides a friendly introduction to Jingle file transfer.

First, the party that wishes to initiate the file transfer determines the receiver's capabilities (via &xep0030; or &xep0115;). In this example, we assume that the receiver supports the following service discovery features (note: these features may not reflect final namespace assignments):

The initiator then sends a Jingle session-initiation request to a potential receiver. The content-type of the request specifies two things:

  1. An application type of "urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer" &NSNOTE;. In particular, the <description/> element contains an <offer/> or <request/> element that in turn contains a <file/> element qualified by the existing 'http://jabber.org/protocol/si/profile/file-transfer' namespace from XEP-0096.
  2. An appropriate transport method. Because the existing transport methods used in XEP-0096 (i.e., &xep0065; and &xep0047;) are not yet defined as Jingle transport methods, this specification registers those definitions.

In this example, the initiation request specifies a file offer and a transport method of bytestreams (i.e., XEP-065).

This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.

]]>

The parties would then attempt to negotiate use of the SOCKS5 Bytestreams transport method, as described in XEP-0065.

More detailed scenarios follow.

Currently, XEP-0096 does not enable the parties to fall back to a second method (e.g., In-Band Bytestreams) if the first method tried (e.g., SOCKS5 Bytestreams) does not work. This problem is addressed by Jingle. Consider the following protocol flow.

This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.

]]>

The receiver would then sends a session-accept.

This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The initiator acknowledges the session-accept action.

]]>

Now the parties attempt to negotiate use of SOCKS5 Bytestreams as defined in XEP-0065.

However, let us imagine that the SOCKS5 Bytestreams negotiation fails. The initiator or responder can then suggest the use of In-Band Bytestreams by sending a content-replace action. Here we assume that the responder sends a content-replace action including a request for the file originally offered and a transport of IBB.

]]>

The initiator then acknowledges the content-replace action.

]]>

If the content definition is acceptable, the initiator then sends a content-accept action to the responder.

]]>

The responder then acknowledges the content-accept action.

]]>

The parties then attempt to use In-Band Bytestreams.

XEP-0096 enable the initiator to offer more than one transport and for the receiving party to choose its desired transport. This flow can be emulated in Jingle negotiation as follows.

This is a test. If this were a real file... This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The responder immediately acknowledges receipt of the session-initiate.

]]>

The receiver then sends a content-remove in order to choose the desired transport, which in this case is IBB.

This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The initiator acknowledges the content-remove action.

]]>

The receiver then sends a session-accept.

This is a test. If this were a real file... ]]>

The initiator acknowledges the session-accept action.

]]>

Now the initiator sends the file using In-Band Bytestreams as defined in XEP-0047.

All implementations MUST support the In-Band Bytestreams transport method.

An application MAY present transport methods in any order, except that the In-Band Bytestreams method MUST be the lowest preference.

Support for Jingle file transfer can be determined through discovery of the 'urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer' namespace &NSNOTE;, via either service discovery or entity capabilities. If the initiator knows that the receiver supports Jingle file transfer, it SHOULD attempt negotiation using XEP-0166 rather than XEP-0095.

In order to secure the data stream, implementations SHOULD use encryption methods appropriate to the transport method being used. For details, refer to the specifications for those transport methods.

No interaction with &IANA; is required as a result of this document.

Until this specification advances to a status of Draft, its associated namespaces shall be:

  • urn:xmpp:tmp:jingle:apps:file-transfer

Upon advancement of this specification, the ®ISTRAR; shall issue permanent namespaces in accordance with the process defined in Section 4 of &xep0053;.

The following namespaces are requested, and are thought to be unique per the XMPP Registrar's requirements:

  • urn:xmpp:jingle:apps:file-transfer

The XMPP Registrar shall include "file-transfer" in its registry of Jingle application formats. The registry submission is as follows:

file-transfer Jingle sessions for the transfer of a file reliable XEP-xxxx ]]>

The XMPP Registrar shall add to its registry of Jingle transport methods definitions for the reliable transport methods defined in XEP-0047 and XEP-0065. The registry submissions are as follows:

bytestreams A method for exchanging data over SOCKS5 Bytestreams. reliable XEP-0065 ibb A method for exchanging data over In-Band Bytestreams. reliable XEP-0047 ]]> ]]>