%ents; ]>
Privileged Entity This specification provides a way for XMPP entities to have a privileged access to some other entities data &LEGALNOTICE; 0356 Experimental Standards Track Standards Council XMPP Core NOT_YET_ASSIGNED Jérôme Poisson goffi@goffi.org goffi@jabber.fr 0.4 2022-04-01 jp
  • Add "iq" privilege (necessary to implement XEPs such as &xep0376;).
  • Roster pushes are now transmitted to privileged entity with "roster" permission of "get" or "both". This can be disabled.
  • Reformulate to specify than only initial stanza and "unavailable" &PRESENCE; stanzas are transmitted with "presence" pemission.
  • Namespace bump.
0.3 2017-09-11 XEP Editor (jwi) Defer due to lack of activity. 0.2 2015-03-23 jp

Several updates according to feedbacks + review:

  • added links to PEP and namespace delegation XEPs
  • removed MUST for default values in configuration
  • <forwarded/> element is now a child of a <privilege/> element
  • <perm/> "namespace" attribute has been renamed to "access"
  • "headline" type restriction for "message" privilege has been removed
  • "message" permission violation now result in a "forbidden" message error
  • for "presence" permission, only &PRESENCE; stanza with no type or with a "unavailable" type are sent to privileged entity
  • added specifitation for "presence" if a managed entity is unavailable and if a privileged entity is available after first &PRESENCE; stanzas have been received
  • added Business Rules section
  • Updated namespace to reflect incompatible changes
0.1 2015-01-27 XEP Editor (mam)

Initial published version approved by the XMPP Council.

0.0.4 2014-12-18 jp
  • Big simplification and restriction following council's veto and standard@ discussions
  • Configuration is now done only on server own configuration
  • No more client mode
  • Permissions are adverised using &MESSAGE;
  • The only &IQ; privilege still available is jabber:iq:roster
0.0.3 2014-11-13 jp
  • giving permission to manage this XEP namespace is forbidden
  • Added configuration section; with well-defined command node
  • better specification of persistent permissions
  • fixed erroneous example (server returns bookmarks)
  • added special permissions
  • better specification of &QUERY; element
0.0.2 2014-09-17 jp
  • changed for privileged entity
  • fixes after feedbacks on standard mailing list
  • completed missing required parts
0.0.1 2014-05-09 jp

First draft.

XMPP components are used for long through &xep0114;, but are quite limited: they have a restricted access to other entities data, similar to what a client can do. This is sufficient for components like gateways, but very limiting for more complex components like a PubSub service. The goal of this XEP is to allow a component or any entity to have a "privileged" status, and access some other entity data with the same privileges than the entity itself, that means manage an entity roster on its behalf, send &MESSAGE;, &IQ; or receive &PRESENCE; stanzas in the name of the server.

Privileged entities have numerous advantages, including:

Privileged entity has been created with the main goal to create an external, server agnostic, PEP service. It is restricted to only a couple of features, see Acknowledgements section for more details.

This XEP is complementary to &xep0355; (and works in a similar way), although they can be used together or separately. To build something like an external PEP service, it is necessary to use both XEPs.

A privileged entity must be able to do what a PEP service can do and to access roster, so it must be able to (according to configuration):

The privilege mechanism MUST be totally transparent for the managed entities.

Roster access is granted in the server configuration. Roster access can have 4 types:

  • none — the entity is not allowed to access managed entity roster at all. This is usually the default value.
  • get — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'get' for the namespace 'jabber:iq:roster'.
  • set — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'set' for namespace 'jabber:iq:roster'.
  • both — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'get' and 'set' for namespace 'jabber:iq:roster'.

Roster access MAY have an optional "push" argument which can be set to "true" or "false" and SHOULD default to "true" if roster permission access type is either "get" or "both", and to "false" otherwise.

If set to "true", the server will send roster pushes as explained below.. If set to "false", the server MUST NOT send roster pushes. The "false" value is mostly there to save resources if the managing entity knows that it doesn't need to be notified of roster updates. Roster pushes MUST NOT be sent if roster permission type is either "none" or "set".

Once a privileged entity is authenticated and stream is started, the server send it a &MESSAGE; stanza with a <privilege/> elements which MUST have the namespace 'urn:xmpp:privilege:2'.

This element contains <perm/> elements which MUST contain a 'access' attribute of the value "roster" and a 'type' attribute which must correspond to the type configured as specified in "Server Allows Roster Access" section.

The <perm> element MAY contain a 'push' attribute with a value of either "true" or "false" according to configuration. If the 'push' attribute is omitted, it defaults to "true" if "roster" permission is "get" or "both", otherwise it's set to "false". If 'push' is "true", roster pushes MUST be transmitted, if 'push' is "false" they MUST NOT be transmitted.

]]>

Here pubsub.capulet.lit is allowed to do get and set operations on all entities managed by capulet.lit

Doing a get or set operation on the roster of a managed entity is done in the usual way (as described in &rfc6121; section 2), except that the 'to' attribute is set to the attribute of the managed entity. The server MUST check that the privileged entity has right to get or set the roster of managed entity, and MUST return a &forbidden; error if it is not the case:

]]>

The server then answers normally, as it would have done to the managed entity:

]]>

If "push" attribute is unset or set to "true" and roster permission type is either "get" or "both", the server MUST send roster pushes when there is a newly created, updated or deleted roster item for roster of any managed entity. A roster push is built as explained in &xmppim; with a 'from' attribute explicitely set to the bare jid of the managed entity.

]]>

In some cases, it can be desirable to send notifications (e.g. PEP service), so the privileged entity must be able to send &MESSAGE; stanzas. This is allowed in server configuration in the same way as for roster permission. The permission type can have the following values:

  • none — the entity is not allowed to send &MESSAGE; stanza in the name of the server. This is usually the default value.
  • outgoing — the entity is allowed to send &MESSAGE; stanzas in the name of the server, according to following restrictions.

A privileged entity can then send message on the behalf either of the server or of a bare JID of an entity managed by the server (i.e. a bare jid with the same domain as the server), using &xep0297;. The <forwarded/> element MUST be a child of a <privilege/> element with a namespace of 'urn:xmpp:privilege:2', with the following restriction:

  1. forwarded &MESSAGE; 'from' attribute MUST be a bare JID from the server, no resource is allowed

If this rule is violated, the server MUST return a &MESSAGE; error with condition <forbidden/>, as in &rfc6120; section 8.3.3.4.

Server advertises "message" permission in the same way as for "roster" permission, except that 'access' attribute has the value of "message", and the 'type' attribute as a value of 'outgoing':

]]>

Now that pubsub.capulet.lit is allowed, it can send messages using <forwarded/> elements.

Gerald Finzi 255 Music for "Love's Labors Lost" (Suite for small orchestra) Introduction (Allegro vigoroso) 1 ]]>

The server sees that forwarded message 'from' attribute (juliet@capulet.lit) is a bare JID of the server, and that outgoing message permission was granted; it can now send the notification:

Gerald Finzi 255 Music for "Love's Labors Lost" (Suite for small orchestra) Introduction (Allegro vigoroso) 1 ]]>

It may be necessary for a component to send &IQ; stanzas on behalf of a server user. This is, for instance, the case for a pubsub component willing to implement &xep0376;.

To do this, an "iq" permission must be granted in server configuration.

To grant an "iq" permission, authorised namespaces must be specified and associated to a value indicating the type of &IQ; request which are allowed. The value is similar to the roster access type, there are 4 values possible:

  • none — the entity is not allowed to send &IQ; stanzas for this namespace.
  • get — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'get' for this namespace.
  • set — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'set' for this namespace.
  • both — the entity is allowed to send &IQ; stanzas of type 'get' and 'set' for this namespace.

Server adversites "iq" permission by using a <perm> element with an 'access' attribute of the value "iq" and wihout 'type' attribute. This element MAY contain any number of <namespace> elements with a 'ns' attribute of the value of the granted namespace, and a 'type' attribute with one of the value indicated in previous section

]]>

Here pubsub.capulet.lit is allowed to send &IQ; stanza of type set with the namespace 'http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub' on behalf of any entity managed by capulet.lit

Sending an &IQ; stanza on behalf of a user is done by following those steps:

  • generate the &IQ; stanza which much be sent on behalf of the user, we call it "encapsulated &IQ; stanza". The 'type' attribute and the namespace of the payload element must match the "iq" permission granted by the server. This &IQ; stanza MUST have a namespace of "jabber:client"
  • the encapsulated &IQ; stanza MUST either have no 'from' attribute, or a 'from' attribute set to the bare jid of the entity on behalf of who the privileged entity is doing the request
  • encapsulate the &IQ; request in a <privileged_iq> element with a namespace of 'urn:xmpp:privilege:2'
  • use the <privileged_iq> element as payload of a top-level &IQ; request adressed to the bare JID of the managed entity
  • use the same type for top-level &IQ; request as for the encapsulated &IQ; request

The server MUST refuse the request with a &forbidden; error if any of the following condition happens:

  • the 'to' attribute of the top-level &IQ; stanza is not a bare JID of a managed entity
  • the requesting entity has not the permission granted for the namespace used in payload of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza
  • the requesting entity has not the permission granted for the type of &IQ; request used in the encapsulated &IQ; stanza for the namespace used in its payload
  • the namespace of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza is not "jabber:client"
  • the 'from' attribute of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza exists and is set to a JID which doesn't match the 'to' attribute of the top-level &IQ; stanza.
  • the 'type' attribute of the top-level &IQ; stanza does not match the 'type' attribute of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza

Once the server gets the &IQ; response, it sends it back to privileged entity using a &xep0297; <forward> element encapsulated in a <privilege> element with a namespace of 'urn:xmpp'.

In following example, the pubsub component pubsub.capulet.lit handles &xep0376;. After getting a pubsub subscribe request, from Juliet to subscribe to Romeo's blog, it forward it to Romeo's server:

]]>

When receiving this stanza, the server does a couple of things:

  • It checks that top-level &IQ; stanza is addressed to the bare JID of a managed entity: it's the case for juliet@capulet.lit.
  • It decapsulate the encapsulated &IQ; stanza, check that it's namespace is 'jabber:client' and that its 'type' attribute has the same value as the top-level &IQ; stanza. It's "set" in both case, so it's good.
  • It gets the payload of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza, and checks that pubsub.capulet.lit is authorised to send priviled &IQ; for its namespace with the given &IQ; type. Here the payload has a namespace of 'http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub' and the &IQ; a type of "set", this combination is authorised for pubsub.capulet.lit, it's good.
  • It checks that the encapsulated &IQ; stanza either has no 'from' attribute or has a 'from' attribute mathing the bare JID set in 'to' attribute of the top-level &IQ; stanza. Here no 'from' attribute is set, it's good.
  • It sets the 'from' attribute of the encapsulated &IQ; stanza to same value as the 'to' attribute of the top-level &IQ; stanza (i.e. the bare JID of the managed entity).
  • Once everything is checked, it can then send the encapsulated &IQ; as if it were sent by Juliet herself (the only difference is that the 'from' attribute has no resource while it would have the resource of Juliet's client if she was sending it herself).
]]>

The server will then get the response with a type of either "result" or "error" as specified in &xmppcore;. It sends it back to pubsub.capulet.lit using a &xep0297; <forward> element:

]]>

pubsub.capulet.lit has now subscribed to Romeo's blog on behalf of Juliet.

It can be often desirable for a privileged entity to have presence information of the managed entities (e.g. to know when to send them notificiations). As privileges must be transparent for the managed entity, this presence has to be sent by the server without modifying managed entity roster.

This is allowed in server configuration in the same way as for roster and message permissions. The "presence" type can have the following values:

  • none — the entity is not allowed to access &PRESENCE; informations at all. This is usually the default value.
  • managed_entity — the entity is allowed to receive managed entity presence (see below).
  • roster — the entity is allowed to receive presence informations of managed entity contacts, see Roster Presence section.

If the privilege is granted, the server MUST use a directed presence from the full jid of the managed entity, to the privileged entity, as specified in &rfc6121; section 4.6, on the behalf of managed entity each time its presence information change.

Only initial &PRESENCE; stanzas and &PRESENCE; stanzas with a 'type' attribute with the value "unavailable" are transmitted to the privileged entity, the server MUST NOT transmit any other &PRESENCE; stanza.

Server advertises "presence" permission in the same way as for "roster" or "message" permissions, except that 'access' attribute has the value of "presence", and the 'type' attribute has a value of "managed_entity"

Once the "presence" permission is granted, the server send presence informations:

chat Staying on the balcony ]]> chat Staying on the balcony ]]>

In addition to "managed entity presence", a privileged entity may need to know when a contact in managed entity roster is online (for example, it's necessary for a PEP service because of the presence default access model).

As for other permissions, the access is granted in server's configuration, but there is an additional restriction: the privileged entity MUST have read permission on roster namespace (i.e. 'type' attribute in allowed <perm> of access roster MUST have a value of either get or both).

If the privilege is granted, the server MUST send to the privileged entity every presence information with no 'type' attribute or with a 'type' with a value of 'unavailable' that the privileged entity is receiving or would receive if it were available. It do it in the same way as for managing entity by using directed &PRESENCE; from the full jid of the entity from which presence information has changed, to the privileged entity. If the managed entity is unavailable but the privileged entity is available, the server MUST send &PRESENCE; stanza to the later anyway.

Having "roster" type for "presence" permission imply that you have also implicitly "managed_entity" type.

The server MUST reject the permission if the privileged entity doesn't have read permission on roster namespace.

Note: this permission should be given carefully, as it gives access to presence of potentially a lot of entities to the privileged entity (see security considerations).

Server advertises roster "presence" permission in the same way as for other permissions, except that the 'access' attribute has the value of "presence", and the 'type' attribute has a value of "roster"

]]>

Note the presence of roster permission request.

]]> ]]>
  1. For "presence" access, if a privileged entity is connected after first &PRESENCE; stanzas have been received, the server MUST send it all the &PRESENCE; stanzas with no 'type' attribute it would have had if it was connected first (in other words: all the presences informations for connected entities it has access to).
  2. For "presence" access, if a privileged entity is supposed to received several time the same &PRESENCE; stanza, the server SHOULD send it only once. For example: if pubsub.capulet.lit has a "presence" access with a "roster" type for capulet.lit, and juliet@capulet.lit and nurse@capulet.it both have romeo@montague.lit in their roster. When romeo is available, pubsub.capulet.lit shoud have its &PRESENCE; stanza only once (instead of 2 times).
  1. Privileged entitiy has access to sensitive data, and can act as the server itself, permissions should be granted carefuly, only if you absolutely trust the entity.
  2. Roster presence is particulary sensitive, because presence informations of whole rosters are shared.
  3. IQ permission namespaces and types must be granted carefuly, as they allow component to act on behalf of any user of the server.
  4. Generaly, the server MUST NOT allow the privileged entity to do anything that the managed entity could not do.

This document requires no interaction with &IANA;.

The ®ISTRAR; includes 'urn:xmpp:privilege:2' in its registry of protocol namespaces (see &NAMESPACES;).

  • urn:xmpp:privilege:2
&NSVER;
]]>

Thanks to Sergey Dobrov, Dave Cridland, Steven Lloyd Watkin, Lance Stout, Johannes Hund, Kurt Zeilenga and Kevin Smith for their feedbacks. Thanks to Adrien Cossa for his typos/style corrections.

Privileged entity was initialy written to be a generic identity based access control (IBAC) which allows an entity to access sensitive data. After a discussion on standard mailing list, it has been decided to restrict the current XEP to immediate needs to build an external PEP service, and to implement separately an Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) which is more modern, generic and flexible. This XEP is still interesting for being easy to implement and doing the job.