moparisthebest/xeps
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps synced 2024-11-28 12:12:22 -05:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

0.3

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: file:///home/ksmith/gitmigration/svn/xmpp/trunk@927 4b5297f7-1745-476d-ba37-a9c6900126ab
This commit is contained in:
Peter Saint-Andre 2007-06-11 19:34:07 +00:00
parent 24827c9e48
commit a001ca064e
2 changed files with 31 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
xep-0211.xml
View File

@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
<supersededby/> <supersededby/>
<shortname>N/A</shortname> <shortname>N/A</shortname>
&stpeter; &stpeter;
<revision>
<version>0.3</version>
<date>2007-06-11</date>
<initials>psa</initials>
<remark><p>Changed XMPP Core and XMPP IM references to bis drafts; added implementation notes.</p></remark>
</revision>
<revision> <revision>
<version>0.2</version> <version>0.2</version>
<date>2007-05-11</date> <date>2007-05-11</date>
@ -55,12 +61,12 @@
<th>Requirement Level</th> <th>Requirement Level</th>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&rfc3920;</strong></td> <td><strong>&rfc3920bis;</strong></td>
<td>REQUIRED</td> <td>REQUIRED *</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&rfc3921;</strong></td> <td><strong>&rfc3921bis;</strong></td>
<td>REQUIRED</td> <td>REQUIRED *</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&xep0030;</strong></td> <td><strong>&xep0030;</strong></td>
@ -79,7 +85,10 @@
<td>RECOMMENDED</td> <td>RECOMMENDED</td>
</tr> </tr>
</table> </table>
<p>Note: Some of these protocols have their own dependencies. In addition, the XMPP RFCs are currently being revised to incorporate errata and feedback based on implementation experience; therefore implementors are advised to refer to &rfc3920bis; and &rfc3921bis; for the most up to date specifications and references.</p> <p>* Note: &xmppcore; and &xmppim; are currently being revised to incorporate errata and feedback based on implementation experience; because it is expected that the revision process will be complete well before this compliance level takes effect, developers are advised to implement the specifications as defined in draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis and draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis rather than RFC 3920 and RFC 3921.</p>
</section1>
<section1 topic='Implementation Notes' anchor='impl'>
<p>Some of the protocol specifications referenced herein have their own dependencies; developers must refer to the relevant specifications for further information.</p>
</section1> </section1>
<section1 topic='Security Considerations' anchor='security'> <section1 topic='Security Considerations' anchor='security'>
<p>This document introduces no additional security considerations above and beyond those defined in the documents on which it depends.</p> <p>This document introduces no additional security considerations above and beyond those defined in the documents on which it depends.</p>

30
xep-0212.xml
View File

@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
<spec>XEP-0030</spec> <spec>XEP-0030</spec>
<spec>XEP-0078</spec> <spec>XEP-0078</spec>
<spec>XEP-0086</spec> <spec>XEP-0086</spec>
<spec>XEP-0106</spec>
<spec>XEP-0115</spec> <spec>XEP-0115</spec>
<spec>XEP-0138</spec> <spec>XEP-0138</spec>
</dependencies> </dependencies>
@ -27,6 +26,12 @@
<supersededby/> <supersededby/>
<shortname>N/A</shortname> <shortname>N/A</shortname>
&stpeter; &stpeter;
<revision>
<version>0.3</version>
<date>2007-06-11</date>
<initials>psa</initials>
<remark><p>Removed JID Escaping (XEP-0106) as recommended since it applies to native clients but not native servers; changed XMPP Core and XMPP IM references to bis drafts added implementation notes.</p></remark>
</revision>
<revision> <revision>
<version>0.2</version> <version>0.2</version>
<date>2007-05-11</date> <date>2007-05-11</date>
@ -57,12 +62,12 @@
<th>Requirement Level</th> <th>Requirement Level</th>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&rfc3920;</strong></td> <td><strong>&rfc3920bis;</strong></td>
<td>REQUIRED</td> <td>REQUIRED *</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&rfc3921;</strong></td> <td><strong>&rfc3921bis;</strong></td>
<td>REQUIRED</td> <td>REQUIRED *</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&xep0030;</strong></td> <td><strong>&xep0030;</strong></td>
@ -70,23 +75,22 @@
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&xep0078;</strong></td> <td><strong>&xep0078;</strong></td>
<td>RECOMMENDED*</td> <td>RECOMMENDED **</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&xep0086;</strong></td> <td><strong>&xep0086;</strong></td>
<td>RECOMMENDED*</td> <td>RECOMMENDED **</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>&xep0106;</strong></td>
<td>RECOMMENDED</td>
</tr> </tr>
<tr> <tr>
<td><strong>&xep0138;</strong></td> <td><strong>&xep0138;</strong></td>
<td>RECOMMENDED</td> <td>RECOMMENDED</td>
</tr> </tr>
</table> </table>
<p>Some of these protocols have their own dependencies. In addition, the XMPP RFCs are currently being revised to incorporate errata and feedback based on implementation experience; therefore implementors are advised to refer to &rfc3920bis; and &rfc3921bis; for the most up to date specifications and references.</p> <p>* Note: &xmppcore; and &xmppim; are currently being revised to incorporate errata and feedback based on implementation experience; because it is expected that the revision process will be complete well before this compliance level takes effect, developers are advised to implement the specifications as defined in draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis and draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis rather than RFC 3920 and RFC 3921.</p>
<p>* Note: Support for XEP-0078 and XEP-0086 is recommended for backward compatibility only. It is likely that compliance definitions for future years will remove these recommendations.</p> <p>** Note: Support for XEP-0078 and XEP-0086 is recommended for backward compatibility only. It is likely that compliance definitions for future years will remove these recommendations.</p>
</section1>
<section1 topic='Implementation Notes' anchor='impl'>
<p>Some of the protocol specifications referenced herein have their own dependencies; developers must refer to the relevant specifications for further information.</p>
</section1> </section1>
<section1 topic='Security Considerations' anchor='security'> <section1 topic='Security Considerations' anchor='security'>
<p>This document introduces no additional security considerations above and beyond those defined in the documents on which it depends.</p> <p>This document introduces no additional security considerations above and beyond those defined in the documents on which it depends.</p>