Remove question on where to standardize MIX Proxy

This commit is contained in:
Steve Kille 2016-11-02 10:26:02 +00:00 committed by Sam Whited
parent b25e9f775e
commit 8f8c2ad8b3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -200,7 +200,7 @@
<p>
The behaviour of a MIX Proxy and the protocol between MIX Proxy and MIX Client is not currently defined in this specification. It will be defined in one of three places.
It may be desirable in some situations to provide different service to different clients. For example, a mobile client may participate in a smaller set of MIX channels than a desktop client. This needs support from the server to which the client connects, so that MIX client and the connected server can negotiate which channels to send. This is not supported by the core MIX specification, but it is anticipated that this will be supported by another specification.
It may be desirable in some situations to provide different service to different clients. For example, a mobile client may participate in a smaller set of MIX channels than a desktop client. This needs support from the server to which the client connects, so that MIX client and the connected server can negotiate which channels to send. This is not supported by the core MIX specification, but it is anticipated that this will be specified in one of the following ways:
</p>
<ol>
@ -211,7 +211,6 @@
<li>As a new section in a future version of the MIX Specification.</li>
</ol>
<p>QUESTION: Input is sought on the best place to standardize MIX Proxy.</p>
</section2>
<section2 topic="User Presence in MIX" anchor="concepts-presence">
<p>