moparisthebest/xeps
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps synced 2024-11-21 08:45:04 -05:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'feature/xep-0068'

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jonas Schäfer 2020-05-26 17:24:51 +02:00
commit 7a15466651
1 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
xep-0068.xml
View File

@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
<registry/>
&hildjj;
&stpeter;
<revision>
<version>1.3.0</version>
<date>2020-05-05</date>
<initials>fs</initials>
<remark>Clarify field type handling of the FORM_TYPE field on submission forms.</remark>
</revision>
<revision>
<version>1.2</version>
<date>2012-05-28</date>
@ -115,7 +121,7 @@
<section1 topic='Use Cases' anchor='usecases'>
<section2 topic='Unspecified Form' anchor='usecases-unspecified'>
<p>These are forms that do not have a hidden field of name FORM_TYPE.
<p>These are forms with type=&quot;form&quot; or type=&quot;result&quot; that do not have a hidden field of name FORM_TYPE or forms with type=&quot;submit&quot; that do not have any field of name FORM_TYPE.
Existing processing rules still apply.</p>
<example caption='Message with no FORM_TYPE'><![CDATA[
<message
@ -171,7 +177,7 @@
</section2>
<section2 topic='Incorrectly Specified FORM_TYPE' anchor='usecases-incorrect'>
<p>If the FORM_TYPE field is not hidden, it MUST be ignored as a context indicator.</p>
<p>If the FORM_TYPE field is not hidden in a form with type=&quot;form&quot; or type=&quot;result&quot;, it MUST be ignored as a context indicator.</p>
<example caption='Message with bad FORM_TYPE'><![CDATA[
<message to="juliet@capulet.com" from="romeo@montague.net/garden">
@ -192,7 +198,7 @@
]]></example>
</section2>
<section2 topic='IQ Example' anchor='usecases-IQ'>
<p>The following example shows a user's interaction with a Multi-User Chat room in order to register with the room.</p>
<p>The following example shows a user's interaction with a Multi-User Chat room in order to register with the room. Note that as per &xep0004; the form field "type" attribute may be omitted in data forms of type "submit".</p>
<example caption='User Requests Registration Requirements'><![CDATA[
<iq
from='hag66@shakespeare.lit/pda'
@ -294,7 +300,7 @@
</section1>
<section1 topic='Implementation Notes' anchor='impl'>
<p>If the FORM_TYPE field is not type=&quot;hidden&quot;, it does not have the special meaning defined herein.</p>
<p>If the FORM_TYPE field is not type=&quot;hidden&quot; in a data form with type &quot;form&quot; or type &quot;result&quot;, it does not have the special meaning defined herein. Data forms with the type "submit" are free to omit any explicit field type declaration (as per &xep0004; § 3.2), as the type is implied by the corresponding "form"-type data form. As consequence, implementations MUST treat a FORM_TYPE field without an explicit type attribute, in data forms of type "submit", as the FORM_TYPE field with the special meaning defined herein.</p>
<p>If the form is used in an IQ, the namespace of the &lt;query/&gt; element SHOULD match the base namespace of the FORM_TYPE. (One possible way of solving this problem would have been to reuse the &lt;query/&gt; tag from the IQ form of jabber:x:data within messages, but that would have meant that existing clients would not have been able to participate in these exchanges.)</p>
</section1>