mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps
synced 2024-12-22 07:38:52 -05:00
Extend the readme with new tooling and workflow
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e29a9fe45
commit
7899f874f3
286
README.md
286
README.md
@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ container. To build the template `make docker`, to run it `make testdocker`
|
||||
stopdocker`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Gardening
|
||||
---------
|
||||
Gardening (Issue triaging by non-editors)
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
For new PRs, anyone with permission may perform gardening tasks.
|
||||
The [Go wiki] sumarizes "gardening" as:
|
||||
@ -106,6 +106,205 @@ For all PRs, start by ensuring that the IP release has been signed and that CI
|
||||
has run and no issues were detected before merging.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Triaging a PR
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
If the PR is not touching a XEP, this guide does not apply. If the PR touches
|
||||
multiple XEPs, go through the steps for each XEP and exit at the first which
|
||||
applies.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is the PR a ProtoXEP?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Does the PR touch existing XEPs? Close as [invalid] and ask the Opener
|
||||
to split the two things.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Add the [ProtoXEP] and [Ready to Merge] labels.
|
||||
3. Stop.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Are the changes *for all XEPs* purely editorial?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add the [Editorial Change] and [Ready to Merge] labels.
|
||||
2. Stop.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Is the XEP **not** in Experimental state?
|
||||
|
||||
(Changes to Non—Experimental XEPs need approval by the approving body as
|
||||
defined in the XEP file itself.)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add the [Needs Council]/[Needs Board] label.
|
||||
2. Put the PR in the [Council Tracking] project.
|
||||
3. (Optionally, continue here with submitting the PR to Council via Trello
|
||||
and move it right to the "On the agenda" column.)
|
||||
4. Stop.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Is the XEP in Experimental state and the PR opener is not an author of the
|
||||
XEP?
|
||||
|
||||
1. If the issue has not been discussed on the standards list *or* if
|
||||
the authors have not been involved in the discussion:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Make sure the standards@ discussion (if it exists) is linked in the
|
||||
PR.
|
||||
2. Add the [Needs Author] label.
|
||||
3. Put the PR in the [Author Tracking] project in the
|
||||
"Not explicitly pinged" bin.
|
||||
4. Stop.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Mark the PR as [Ready to Merge].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Council Tracking
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
The [Council Tracking] project is used to track a PR through the Council
|
||||
approval process. The following columns are used:
|
||||
|
||||
* On agenda: The PR has been added to the council trello and is awaiting
|
||||
handling by Council.
|
||||
* Voting in progress: The PR has been discussed by council, but not everyone
|
||||
has voted yet. Aside from exceptional circumstances, a PR can only reside
|
||||
for at most two weeks in this column.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that council voting is veto-based and if someone did not vote, consent
|
||||
is assumed. So a PR is rejected *iff* at least one person from council
|
||||
explicitly voted against it.
|
||||
* Done: The PR went through voting, but has not been merged yet. The
|
||||
[Needs Council] label must be removed and the [Ready to merge] label should
|
||||
be added. The PR can be removed from [Council Tracking] now.
|
||||
|
||||
If a card awaits triaging, add it to the [Council Trello] in the first column
|
||||
*under* the "Find Minutes taker". Put the PR in the "On agenda" column (in the
|
||||
[Council Tracking], not the [Council Trello]).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Author Tracking
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
This is less formal and more a tool for the editors to keep track of at which
|
||||
stage of escalation we are when getting in contact with the Authors. The
|
||||
columns should be self-explaining.
|
||||
|
||||
Use your gut feeling on how long you wait for an authors reaction, but giving
|
||||
them at least a week on each stage seems reasonable.
|
||||
|
||||
When an author replies and a discussion starts, move the PR to "Discussion in
|
||||
progress" and remember to check back once in a while if the discussion
|
||||
resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Discussions
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
Technical discussions SHOULD NOT happen in the xeps repository. If you see a
|
||||
discussion evolve into technical (as opposed to editorial) matters, do the
|
||||
following (I haven’t tried that myself yet, so feel especially free to improve
|
||||
the process):
|
||||
|
||||
1. Lock the conversation.
|
||||
2. Copy the technical discussion parts into an email to standards@. My
|
||||
preferred format for this would be something along the lines of:
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: XEP-1234: [insert PR subject here, or something more appropriate]
|
||||
|
||||
There was some discussion on the xeps repository an XEP-1234, which got
|
||||
technical. I moved this discussion to standards@ so that the whole
|
||||
community is aware of the issue and can participate.
|
||||
|
||||
@user1 wrote:
|
||||
> quote user1 here ...
|
||||
|
||||
@user2 wrote:
|
||||
> quote user2 here ...
|
||||
|
||||
Remove clearly editorial discussion and mark the removal with ``[…]``.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Add the [Needs List Discussion] label to the PR and link the standards@
|
||||
thread you just created. Remove other labels (such as [Needs Author]).
|
||||
|
||||
4. Monitor the thread; when the discussion is resolved, the PR opener will
|
||||
usually prepare an update. Unlock the conversation to allow editorial
|
||||
discussion to continue, if needed. Remove the [Needs List Discussion] label
|
||||
and re-triage the PR as described above.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** The locking is mostly used here as a tool to avoid a race
|
||||
condition, not to exclude people from participating. (It would be
|
||||
unfortunate if you had to add more comments to your already-sent email.)
|
||||
Feel free to unlock at some point during the list discussion when you’re
|
||||
sure that all participants have taken note of the move.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
General notes on making changes
|
||||
-------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This section has some hints on the python scripts which help you doing the
|
||||
more tedious tasks of sending emails and properly archiving XEPs.
|
||||
|
||||
*Before* you start working on merging a Pull Request:
|
||||
|
||||
* Ideally, you have the [xep-attic] repository cloned next to the xeps
|
||||
repository.
|
||||
|
||||
* Before starting to prepare a merge and push, ensure that you have the XEP
|
||||
metadata up-to-date locally:
|
||||
|
||||
$ make build/xeplist.xml
|
||||
|
||||
* Make a copy of the metadata:
|
||||
|
||||
$ cp build/xeplist.xml tools/old-xeplist.xml
|
||||
|
||||
(avoid putting random XML files in the xeps root directory, the build
|
||||
tooling might mistake them as XEPs; so we put it somewhere else.)
|
||||
|
||||
*While* you’re working on a Pull Request:
|
||||
|
||||
* Use the lokal docker build to ensure that everything is syntactically
|
||||
correct. The process is described above in "Using Docker".
|
||||
|
||||
When you have *merged* the Pull Request and the change went through to the
|
||||
webserver (see also the [Docker Build] to track the build progress):
|
||||
|
||||
* Send out the emails. First ensure that the new metadata is up-to-date:
|
||||
|
||||
$ make build/xeplist.xml
|
||||
|
||||
Check that the emails which will be send are correct (the ``--dry-run``
|
||||
switch prevents the tool from actually sending emails):
|
||||
|
||||
$ ./tools/send-updates.py --dry-run tools/old-xeplist.xml build/xeplist.xml standards@xmpp.org
|
||||
|
||||
(See also the ``--help`` output for more information.)
|
||||
|
||||
Once you’ve verified that the correct emails will be sent, actually send
|
||||
them using (note the missing ``--dry-run`` flag):
|
||||
|
||||
$ ./tools/send-updates.py tools/old-xeplist.xml build/xeplist.xml standards@xmpp.org
|
||||
|
||||
A few tips:
|
||||
|
||||
1. You can also test-send them to your own address by replacing
|
||||
``standards@xmpp.org`` with your own address.
|
||||
2. To avoid having to enter your email account details every time, use a
|
||||
configuration file. Invoke the tool with ``--help`` for more
|
||||
information and ask [jonasw]/[@horazont] if things are still unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
If the tool misbehaves, pester [jonasw]/[@horazont] about it.
|
||||
|
||||
* Don’t forget to archive the new versions of the XEPs. If you have the
|
||||
[xep-attic] cloned next to the xeps repository, you can simply run:
|
||||
|
||||
$ ./tools/archive.py tools/old-xeplist.xml build/xeplist.xml
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, you will have to explicitly give the path to the attic:
|
||||
|
||||
$ ./tools/archive.py --attic /path/to/xep-attic/content/ tools/old-xeplist.xml build/xeplist.xml
|
||||
|
||||
(note that the path must point to the ``content`` subdirectory of the
|
||||
[xep-attic].)
|
||||
|
||||
Don’t forget to commit & push the changes to [xep-attic].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
New ProtoXEPs
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -115,28 +314,27 @@ New ProtoXEPs
|
||||
this or ask the author to fix it).
|
||||
- You may want to build the protoxep locally and ensure the HTML and PDF look
|
||||
okay.
|
||||
- Merge the PR as described in "Merging a PR". Once the email has been sent,
|
||||
continue here.
|
||||
- Create a card for the protoxep on the [Council Trello] under "Proposed
|
||||
Agendums".
|
||||
- Attach the PR to the card, and comment on the PR with a link to the card,
|
||||
thanking the author for their submission and letting them know that their XEP
|
||||
will be voted on within the next two weeks.
|
||||
- Merge the PR and add a link to the generated protoxep (does this happen
|
||||
automatically yet?) to the card so that council can read it.
|
||||
- Wait for the XEP to appear on xmpp.org and then log into the webserver, change
|
||||
directories to `/home/xsf/xmpp-hg/extensions`, perform an `hg pull && hg
|
||||
update` (yes, that's right) and run `inxep.py name approvingbody` (eg.
|
||||
`./inxep.py pars council`).
|
||||
Agendums" and add the PR to the [Council Tracking].
|
||||
- Attach the PR to the card and link the generated HTML.
|
||||
- Comment on the PR with a link to the card, thanking the author for their
|
||||
submission and letting them know that their XEP will be voted on within the
|
||||
next two weeks.
|
||||
- If the council forgets and doesn't vote on the protoxep, pester them until
|
||||
they do.
|
||||
- If the council rejects the XEP, you're done (leave the XEP in the inbox and
|
||||
inform the author of the councils decision).
|
||||
Otherwise, see "Promoting a ProtoXEP".
|
||||
inform the author of the councils decision). Otherwise, see
|
||||
"Promoting a ProtoXEP".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Promoting a ProtoXEP
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
- Once the council approves a ProtoXEP, move it out of the inbox and into the
|
||||
- It is easiest to start a new branch, in case you screw something up on the
|
||||
way.
|
||||
- Once the council approves a ProtoXEP, *copy* it out of the inbox and into the
|
||||
root, assigning it the next available number in the XEP series.
|
||||
- Modify the `<number/>` element in the XML file to match.
|
||||
- Set the version to `0.1` and the initials to `XEP Editor: xyz` (replacing
|
||||
@ -144,10 +342,9 @@ Promoting a ProtoXEP
|
||||
- Remove the `<interim/>` element from the XML file if it is included.
|
||||
- Set the status to `Experimental`.
|
||||
- Add a reference to the XEP in `xep.ent`.
|
||||
- Archive the first version of the XEP (TODO: this process is currently
|
||||
changing; add a description when the dust has settled).
|
||||
- Wait for the XEP to be published then log into the webserver and run
|
||||
`announce.py` (TODO: Add an example here).
|
||||
- Make a commit.
|
||||
- Treat your branch as you would treat a [Ready to Merge] PR in "Merging a PR".
|
||||
(you don’t need to create another branch though.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Promoting XEPs
|
||||
@ -165,13 +362,64 @@ You can also refer to `xep-template.xml` for a recommended list of sections and
|
||||
whether or not they are required.
|
||||
For a helpful graph of how XEP promotion works, see [XEP-0001].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Merging a PR
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Before Merging a PR, read the "General notes on making changes" section.
|
||||
|
||||
When you get to the point that the PR is [Ready to Merge], do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create a new branch off master called ``feature/xep-1234`` (if the PR
|
||||
touches multiple XEPs, I call it ``feature/xep-0678,xep-0789``).
|
||||
|
||||
2. Merge all [Ready to Merge] PRs which affect the XEP(s) into that branch.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Resolve conflicts.
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the PRs introduced multiple revision blocks, squash it down to a single
|
||||
revision block. Set "XEP Editor (initials)" as author of the revision block
|
||||
and add the initials of the original PR authors to the changelog entries.
|
||||
(If that doesn’t make sense to you, you’ll find plenty examples in the
|
||||
XEPs.)
|
||||
|
||||
5. Ensure that everything builds by performing a full docker build (see above).
|
||||
|
||||
(Once the docker build reaches the point where the XEPs are built, you can
|
||||
switch branches and work on another PR.)
|
||||
|
||||
6. If the build passes, check that the generated files look sane by running the
|
||||
docker container.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Merge the PR into master. If you are working on independent changes to
|
||||
multiple XEPs, you can merge them all in one go.
|
||||
|
||||
8. If you merged multiple things into master, re-do the docker build check.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Push.
|
||||
|
||||
10. Go back to "General notes on making changes".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[XEP-0001]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html
|
||||
[XEP-0053]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0053.html
|
||||
[Editor Trello]: https://trello.com/b/gwcOFnCr
|
||||
[Council Trello]: https://trello.com/b/ww7zWMlI
|
||||
[Needs Council]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Needs%20Council
|
||||
[Needs Board]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Needs%20Board
|
||||
[ProtoXEP]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/ProtoXEP
|
||||
[Go wiki]: https://golang.org/wiki/Gardening
|
||||
[`is:open is:pr no:assignee`]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Apr%20no%3Aassignee%20
|
||||
[Needs Author]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Needs%20Author
|
||||
[Ready to Merge]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Ready%20to%20Merge
|
||||
[Council Tracking]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/projects/1
|
||||
[Author Tracking]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/projects/2
|
||||
[Needs List Discussion]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Needs%20List%20Discussion
|
||||
[Editorial Change]: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Editorial%20Change
|
||||
[xep-attic]: https://github.com/xsf/xep-attic
|
||||
[Docker Build]: https://hub.docker.com/r/xmppxsf/xeps/builds/
|
||||
[@horazont]: https://github.com/horazont/
|
||||
[jonasw]: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/User:Jwi
|
||||
|
||||
[modeline]: # ( vim: set fenc=utf-8 ff=unix spell spl=en textwidth=80: )
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user