mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/xeps
synced 2024-12-22 07:38:52 -05:00
0.8
This commit is contained in:
parent
6caad9581c
commit
48342fbe22
33
xep-0260.xml
33
xep-0260.xml
@ -33,6 +33,12 @@
|
||||
<email>klaus.hartke@googlemail.com</email>
|
||||
<jid>nx@jabber.org</jid>
|
||||
</author>
|
||||
<revision>
|
||||
<version>0.8</version>
|
||||
<date>2011-09-08</date>
|
||||
<initials>psa</initials>
|
||||
<remark><p>More clearly described how to activate the bytestream.</p></remark>
|
||||
</revision>
|
||||
<revision>
|
||||
<version>0.7</version>
|
||||
<date>2011-08-31</date>
|
||||
@ -169,6 +175,12 @@ Initiator Responder
|
||||
port='5087'
|
||||
priority='8258636'
|
||||
type='direct'/>
|
||||
<candidate cid='xmdh4b7i'
|
||||
host='123.456.7.8'
|
||||
jid='streamer.shakespeare.lit'
|
||||
port='7625'
|
||||
priority='8258636'
|
||||
type='proxy'/>
|
||||
</transport>
|
||||
</content>
|
||||
</jingle>
|
||||
@ -325,7 +337,26 @@ priority = (2^16)*(type preference) + (local preference)
|
||||
<li>If both parties send a candidate-used notification but the candidates have a different priority, then the candidate with the higher priority shall be considered the nominated candidate.</li>
|
||||
<li>If both parties send a candidate-used notification with candidates having the same priority, then the candidate chosen by the initiator shall be considered the nominated candidate (this is consistent with the rules in <cite>XEP-0166</cite>).</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
<p>The parties shall use the nominated candidate for the data transfer. If the nominated candidate is of the proxy type, then the peer has no way to know when it can send data. Therefore the party that offered the nominated candidate MUST send an activated notification to the peer once it has activated the bytestream (as described in <cite>XEP-0065</cite>); it does so by sending a transport-info message containing an <activated/> element as follows.</p>
|
||||
<p>The parties shall use the nominated candidate for the data transfer. However, if the nominated candidate is of the "proxy" type, then the peer has no way to know when it can send data. Therefore the party that offered the nominated candidate MUST do two things...</p>
|
||||
<p>First, it activates the bytestream, as described in <cite>XEP-0065</cite>:</p>
|
||||
<example caption="Responder activates the bytestream at proxy"><![CDATA[
|
||||
<iq from='juliet@capulet.lit/balcony'
|
||||
id='vy1fa63k'
|
||||
to='streamer.shakespeare.lit'
|
||||
type='set'>
|
||||
<query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/bytestreams'
|
||||
sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'>
|
||||
<activate>romeo@montague.lit/orchard</activate>
|
||||
</query>
|
||||
</iq>
|
||||
]]></example>
|
||||
<example caption="Proxy informs responder of activation"><![CDATA[
|
||||
<iq from='streamer.shakespeare.lit'
|
||||
id='vy1fa63k'
|
||||
to='juliet@capulet.lit/balcony'
|
||||
type='result'/>
|
||||
]]></example>
|
||||
<p>Second, it sends an activated notification to the peer; it does so by sending a transport-info message containing an <activated/> element:</p>
|
||||
<example caption="Responder informs initiator that bytestream has been activated"><![CDATA[
|
||||
<iq from='juliet@capulet.lit/balcony'
|
||||
id='bv73bs91'
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user