106 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dan	d9dd14a995	[svn] * AUTHORS: Added -E to thst list of my stuff. ... * TODO: We need to check the HTTP spec w.r.t. simplification of absolute URLs. * MAILING-LIST: I didn't realize <wget@sunsite.auc.dk> allowed posting by non-subscribers. <bug-wget@gnu.org> soon to be an alias for it. * NEWS: Always forget to update this file when making user-vis. changes.	2000-10-20 15:29:42 -07:00
dan	86ac3fdcbd	[svn] * MACHINES: Previously said to send updates to "me" (Hrvoje) -- now says to ... email the mailing list or bug-wget@gnu.org. * MAILING-LIST: Added mention of bug-wget@gnu.org. * NEWS: Added --waitretry and --page-requisites.	2000-08-30 14:07:40 -07:00
dan	1c083869b0	[svn] Previously forgot to add a note about new --follow-tags and -G / --ignore-tags.	2000-04-04 19:02:08 -07:00
dan	4331c39c9a	[svn] Implemented the item I formerly had in the TODO: When -K and -N are used ... together, we compare local file X.orig (if extant) against server file X. Previously -k and -N were worthless in combination because the local converted files always differed from the server versions.	2000-03-01 22:33:48 -08:00
dan	e0a58713f7	[svn] Upped version number from 1.5.3. to 1.5.3+dev. Because the development source ... is available via anonymous CVS and desirable features are being added, it's quite possible for end-users to be getting their hands on development versions. They may report bugs, so if we don't change the version number, we'll have to continually followup the statement "I'm using version 1.5.3" with the question "The FTP archive or the CVS source?" Better to just make this development version have a unique number. Once we're ready to actually release the next version, we can up the version from 1.5.3+dev to 1.5.4, or 1.6, or whatever it turns out to be (depending on how much development gets done). Also made minor updates (dates, email addresses) to wget.texi.	2000-02-29 16:50:52 -08:00
kwget	31d6616c48	[svn] Initial revision	1999-12-01 23:42:23 -08:00