2001-03-01 20:46:23 -05:00
|
|
|
Please note that Wget has more than one ChangeLog file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./ChangeLog: documents changes to files in the top-level directory
|
|
|
|
and to files in subdirectories like po/ that don't have
|
|
|
|
their own ChangeLogs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doc/ChangeLog: documents only changes to files in the doc directory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
src/ChangeLog: documents only changes to files in the src directory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When checking to see if a patch you sent in has been applied, please
|
|
|
|
look in the appropriate ChangeLog(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, you'll notice the ChangeLog-branches directories.
|
|
|
|
|
2001-01-06 04:26:02 -05:00
|
|
|
In late 2000, time constraints delayed the release of Wget 1.6. While
|
|
|
|
it was awaiting release, people had new features and other changes they
|
|
|
|
wanted added to the CVS archive, but these were deemed not safe to
|
|
|
|
introduce just before a release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The solution was to split the stable 1.6 off onto its own branch, while
|
|
|
|
free-wheeling development continued on the main branch (whose version
|
|
|
|
was changed from 1.5.3+dev to 1.7-dev).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately it's difficult to portray this branched development in the
|
|
|
|
flat ChangeLog file. Either you include 1.6-branch changes in the
|
|
|
|
1.7-branch ChangeLog, in which case it becomes impossible to tell what
|
|
|
|
release version a given change first went into Wget, just judging by
|
|
|
|
date and position in the ChangeLog, or you omit all 1.6-branch changes
|
|
|
|
from the 1.7-branch ChangeLog, in which case all evidence of the
|
|
|
|
existence of 1.6 (and further information about that branch) disappears
|
|
|
|
from future versions of Wget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The solution that was decided upon was to make a subdirectory called
|
|
|
|
ChangeLog-branches adjacent to each ChangeLog file. Inside is the
|
|
|
|
corresponding ChangeLog from the most recent release on the stable
|
|
|
|
branch (e.g. 1.6_branch.ChangeLog). This way, no information is lost
|
|
|
|
and there's no misleading information in the ChangeLog.
|