Bugzilla 47048 - Fixed evaluation of defined names with the 'complex' flag set
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@775376 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Josh Micich
parent
7b8b6d7d2c
commit
eaa9c19074
@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Don't forget to update status.xml too! -->
|
||||
<release version="3.5-beta6" date="2009-??-??">
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">47048 - Fixed evaluation of defined names with the 'complex' flag set</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">46953 - More tweaks to PageSettingsBlock parsing logic in Sheet constructor</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">47089 - Fixed XSSFWorkbook.createSheet to properly increment sheetId</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">46568 - Fixed XSLFPowerPointExtractor to properly process line breaks</action>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
|
||||
<!-- Don't forget to update changes.xml too! -->
|
||||
<changes>
|
||||
<release version="3.5-beta6" date="2009-??-??">
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">47048 - Fixed evaluation of defined names with the 'complex' flag set</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">46953 - More tweaks to PageSettingsBlock parsing logic in Sheet constructor</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">47089 - Fixed XSSFWorkbook.createSheet to properly increment sheetId</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">46568 - Fixed XSLFPowerPointExtractor to properly process line breaks</action>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ public final class NameRecord extends StandardRecord {
|
||||
public static final int OPT_COMPLEX = 0x0010;
|
||||
public static final int OPT_BUILTIN = 0x0020;
|
||||
public static final int OPT_BINDATA = 0x1000;
|
||||
public static final boolean isFormula(int optValue) {
|
||||
return (optValue & 0x0F) == 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private short field_1_option_flag;
|
||||
@ -239,7 +242,7 @@ public final class NameRecord extends StandardRecord {
|
||||
* @return <code>true</code> if name has a formula (named range or defined value)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean hasFormula() {
|
||||
return field_1_option_flag == 0 && field_13_name_definition.getEncodedTokenSize() > 0;
|
||||
return Option.isFormula(field_1_option_flag) && field_13_name_definition.getEncodedTokenSize() > 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
@ -21,9 +21,41 @@ import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
|
||||
import junit.framework.TestCase;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.HSSFTestDataSamples;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.NameRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.constant.ErrorConstant;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AbstractFunctionPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.*;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AddPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.Area3DPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AreaI;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AreaPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AreaPtgBase;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.ArrayPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.AttrPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.BoolPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.ConcatPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.DividePtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.EqualPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.ErrPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.FuncPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.FuncVarPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.IntPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.MemAreaPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.MemFuncPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.MissingArgPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.MultiplyPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.NamePtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.NumberPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.PercentPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.PowerPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.Ptg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.RangePtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.Ref3DPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.RefPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.StringPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.SubtractPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.UnaryMinusPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.UnaryPlusPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.UnionPtg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.FormulaExtractor;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFCell;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFErrorConstants;
|
||||
@ -32,6 +64,7 @@ import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFName;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFSheet;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFWorkbook;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.TestHSSFName;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.formula.FormulaParser;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.formula.FormulaParserTestHelper;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.BaseTestBugzillaIssues;
|
||||
@ -450,7 +483,7 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void testPrecedenceAndAssociativity() {
|
||||
|
||||
Class[] expClss;
|
||||
Class<?>[] expClss;
|
||||
|
||||
// TRUE=TRUE=2=2 evaluates to FALSE
|
||||
expClss = new Class[] { BoolPtg.class, BoolPtg.class, EqualPtg.class,
|
||||
@ -484,12 +517,12 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
confirmTokenClasses("2^200%", expClss);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* package */ static Ptg[] confirmTokenClasses(String formula, Class[] expectedClasses) {
|
||||
/* package */ static Ptg[] confirmTokenClasses(String formula, Class<?>[] expectedClasses) {
|
||||
Ptg[] ptgs = parseFormula(formula);
|
||||
confirmTokenClasses(ptgs, expectedClasses);
|
||||
return ptgs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
private static void confirmTokenClasses(Ptg[] ptgs, Class[] expectedClasses) {
|
||||
private static void confirmTokenClasses(Ptg[] ptgs, Class<?>[] expectedClasses) {
|
||||
assertEquals(expectedClasses.length, ptgs.length);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < expectedClasses.length; i++) {
|
||||
if(expectedClasses[i] != ptgs[i].getClass()) {
|
||||
@ -504,7 +537,7 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
confirmTokenClasses("2^5", new Class[] { IntPtg.class, IntPtg.class, PowerPtg.class, });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static Ptg parseSingleToken(String formula, Class ptgClass) {
|
||||
private static Ptg parseSingleToken(String formula, Class<? extends Ptg> ptgClass) {
|
||||
Ptg[] ptgs = parseFormula(formula);
|
||||
assertEquals(1, ptgs.length);
|
||||
Ptg result = ptgs[0];
|
||||
@ -533,7 +566,7 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
|
||||
public void testMissingArgs() {
|
||||
|
||||
Class[] expClss;
|
||||
Class<?>[] expClss;
|
||||
|
||||
expClss = new Class[] {
|
||||
RefPtg.class,
|
||||
@ -930,7 +963,7 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
wb.createSheet("Sheet1");
|
||||
Ptg[] ptgs = FormulaParser.parse(formula, HSSFEvaluationWorkbook.create(wb));
|
||||
|
||||
Class[] expectedClasses = {
|
||||
Class<?>[] expectedClasses = {
|
||||
// TODO - AttrPtg.class, // Excel prepends this
|
||||
MemFuncPtg.class,
|
||||
Area3DPtg.class,
|
||||
@ -958,7 +991,7 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
throw new AssertionFailedError("Identified bug 46643");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Class [] expectedClasses = {
|
||||
Class<?> [] expectedClasses = {
|
||||
MemFuncPtg.class,
|
||||
Ref3DPtg.class,
|
||||
Ref3DPtg.class,
|
||||
@ -1165,4 +1198,35 @@ public final class TestFormulaParser extends TestCase {
|
||||
FormulaParserTestHelper.confirmParseException(e, expectedMessage);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* In bug 47078, POI had trouble evaluating a defined name flagged as 'complex'.
|
||||
* POI should also be able to parse such defined names.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void testParseComplexName() {
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock up a spreadsheet to match the critical details of the sample
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = new HSSFWorkbook();
|
||||
wb.createSheet("Sheet1");
|
||||
HSSFName definedName = wb.createName();
|
||||
definedName.setNameName("foo");
|
||||
definedName.setRefersToFormula("Sheet1!B2");
|
||||
|
||||
// Set the complex flag - POI doesn't usually manipulate this flag
|
||||
NameRecord nameRec = TestHSSFName.getNameRecord(definedName);
|
||||
nameRec.setOptionFlag((short)0x10); // 0x10 -> complex
|
||||
|
||||
Ptg[] result;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
result = HSSFFormulaParser.parse("1+foo", wb);
|
||||
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
|
||||
FormulaParserTestHelper.confirmParseException(e);
|
||||
if (e.getMessage().equals("Specified name 'foo' is not a range as expected.")) {
|
||||
throw new AssertionFailedError("Identified bug 47078c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw e;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertNotNull("Ptg array should not be null", result);
|
||||
confirmTokenClasses(result, new Class[] { IntPtg.class, NamePtg.class, AddPtg.class,});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
|
||||
import junit.framework.TestCase;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.HSSFTestDataSamples;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.NameRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Cell;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.CellValue;
|
||||
/**
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -121,4 +123,48 @@ public final class TestHSSFFormulaEvaluator extends TestCase {
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertEquals(3.5, cellB1.getNumericCellValue(), 0.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* When evaluating defined names, POI has to decide whether it is capable. Currently
|
||||
* (May2009) POI only supports simple cell and area refs.<br/>
|
||||
* The sample spreadsheet (bugzilla attachment 23508) had a name flagged as 'complex'
|
||||
* which contained a simple area ref. It is not clear what the 'complex' flag is used
|
||||
* for but POI should look elsewhere to decide whether it can evaluate the name.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void testDefinedNameWithComplexFlag_bug47048() {
|
||||
// Mock up a spreadsheet to match the critical details of the sample
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = new HSSFWorkbook();
|
||||
HSSFSheet sheet = wb.createSheet("Input");
|
||||
HSSFName definedName = wb.createName();
|
||||
definedName.setNameName("Is_Multicar_Vehicle");
|
||||
definedName.setRefersToFormula("Input!$B$17:$G$17");
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up some data and the formula
|
||||
HSSFRow row17 = sheet.createRow(16);
|
||||
row17.createCell(0).setCellValue(25.0);
|
||||
row17.createCell(1).setCellValue(1.33);
|
||||
row17.createCell(2).setCellValue(4.0);
|
||||
|
||||
HSSFRow row = sheet.createRow(0);
|
||||
HSSFCell cellA1 = row.createCell(0);
|
||||
cellA1.setCellFormula("SUM(Is_Multicar_Vehicle)");
|
||||
|
||||
// Set the complex flag - POI doesn't usually manipulate this flag
|
||||
NameRecord nameRec = TestHSSFName.getNameRecord(definedName);
|
||||
nameRec.setOptionFlag((short)0x10); // 0x10 -> complex
|
||||
|
||||
HSSFFormulaEvaluator hsf = new HSSFFormulaEvaluator(wb);
|
||||
CellValue value;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
value = hsf.evaluate(cellA1);
|
||||
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
|
||||
if (e.getMessage().equals("Don't now how to evalate name 'Is_Multicar_Vehicle'")) {
|
||||
throw new AssertionFailedError("Identified bug 47048a");
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw e;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC, value.getCellType());
|
||||
assertEquals(5.33, value.getNumberValue(), 0.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -17,28 +17,19 @@
|
||||
|
||||
package org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.Date;
|
||||
import java.util.GregorianCalendar;
|
||||
import java.io.File;
|
||||
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
|
||||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
|
||||
|
||||
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.HSSFITestDataProvider;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.HSSFTestDataSamples;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.model.Sheet;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.model.HSSFFormulaParser;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.DBCellRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.FormulaRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.Record;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.StringRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.NameRecord;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.Ptg;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.ErrorConstants;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.BaseTestCell;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.formula.FormulaType;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.BaseTestNamedRange;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.util.AreaReference;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.util.CellReference;
|
||||
import org.apache.poi.ss.formula.FormulaType;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Tests various functionality having to do with {@link org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Name}.
|
||||
@ -50,6 +41,30 @@ import org.apache.poi.ss.formula.FormulaType;
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public final class TestHSSFName extends BaseTestNamedRange {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* For manipulating the internals of {@link HSSFName} during testing.<br/>
|
||||
* Some tests need a {@link NameRecord} with unusual state, not normally producible by POI.
|
||||
* This method achieves the aims at low cost without augmenting the POI usermodel api.
|
||||
* @return a reference to the wrapped {@link NameRecord}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static NameRecord getNameRecord(HSSFName definedName) {
|
||||
|
||||
Field f;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
f = HSSFName.class.getDeclaredField("_definedNameRec");
|
||||
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
f.setAccessible(true);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return (NameRecord) f.get(definedName);
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
protected HSSFITestDataProvider getTestDataProvider(){
|
||||
return HSSFITestDataProvider.getInstance();
|
||||
@ -112,7 +127,6 @@ public final class TestHSSFName extends BaseTestNamedRange {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Test of TestCase method, of class test.RangeTest. */
|
||||
public void testNamedRange() {
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = getTestDataProvider().openSampleWorkbook("Simple.xls");
|
||||
|
||||
@ -150,7 +164,7 @@ public final class TestHSSFName extends BaseTestNamedRange {
|
||||
public void testNamedRead() {
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = getTestDataProvider().openSampleWorkbook("namedinput.xls");
|
||||
|
||||
//Get index of the namedrange with the name = "NamedRangeName" , which was defined in input.xls as A1:D10
|
||||
//Get index of the named range with the name = "NamedRangeName" , which was defined in input.xls as A1:D10
|
||||
int NamedRangeIndex = wb.getNameIndex("NamedRangeName");
|
||||
|
||||
//Getting NAmed Range
|
||||
@ -201,7 +215,7 @@ public final class TestHSSFName extends BaseTestNamedRange {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
public void testDeletedReference() throws Exception {
|
||||
public void testDeletedReference() {
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = HSSFTestDataSamples.openSampleWorkbook("24207.xls");
|
||||
assertEquals(2, wb.getNumberOfNames());
|
||||
|
||||
@ -224,9 +238,9 @@ public final class TestHSSFName extends BaseTestNamedRange {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* When setting A1 type of referencese HSSFName.setRefersToFormula
|
||||
* When setting A1 type of references with HSSFName.setRefersToFormula
|
||||
* must set the type of operands to Ptg.CLASS_REF,
|
||||
* otherwise created named don't appear in the dropdown to the left opf formula bar in Excel
|
||||
* otherwise created named don't appear in the drop-down to the left of formula bar in Excel
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void testTypeOfRootPtg(){
|
||||
HSSFWorkbook wb = new HSSFWorkbook();
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user