From dd9b43dc9c3e4913730b2745d5fb5b7007343d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Glen Stampoultzis <glens@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:08:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Oops.  Missed something.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/poi/trunk@352296 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
 src/documentation/xdocs/hssf/how-to.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/documentation/xdocs/hssf/how-to.xml b/src/documentation/xdocs/hssf/how-to.xml
index 01d59232d..d642f6152 100644
--- a/src/documentation/xdocs/hssf/how-to.xml
+++ b/src/documentation/xdocs/hssf/how-to.xml
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ down problems.
 <p>So Why use commons logging rather than log4j? Well the following discussion from
 the jakarta-general mailing list sums it up pretty well.  (Thanks Morgan)
 </p>
-<p>Here's the problem, as I see it.
+<p><em>Here's the problem, as I see it.</em>
 </p>
 <p><em>Suppose Commons component A decides to adopt Log4J, Commons component B
 decides to adopt LogKit, and Commons component C adopts JDK1.4 logging.