Fix bug #61007
use CellFormat for all format strings containing multiple parts (";" delimited) and update unit test to expect the same values as Excel. Also added tests for the failing formats. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1791949 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4d08d5ce8
commit
d1b92fe2d8
@ -312,14 +312,13 @@ public class DataFormatter implements Observer {
|
||||
|
||||
String formatStr = formatStrIn;
|
||||
|
||||
// Excel supports 3+ part conditional data formats, eg positive/negative/zero,
|
||||
// Excel supports 2+ part conditional data formats, eg positive/negative/zero,
|
||||
// or (>1000),(>0),(0),(negative). As Java doesn't handle these kinds
|
||||
// of different formats for different ranges, just +ve/-ve, we need to
|
||||
// handle these ourselves in a special way.
|
||||
// For now, if we detect 3+ parts, we call out to CellFormat to handle it
|
||||
// For now, if we detect 2+ parts, we call out to CellFormat to handle it
|
||||
// TODO Going forward, we should really merge the logic between the two classes
|
||||
if (formatStr.contains(";") &&
|
||||
formatStr.indexOf(';') != formatStr.lastIndexOf(';')) {
|
||||
if (formatStr.contains(";") ) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Ask CellFormat to get a formatter for it
|
||||
CellFormat cfmt = CellFormat.getInstance(formatStr);
|
||||
|
@ -198,6 +198,15 @@ public class TestDataFormatter {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testConditionalRanges() {
|
||||
DataFormatter dfUS = new DataFormatter(Locale.US);
|
||||
|
||||
String format = "[>=10]#,##0;[<10]0.0";
|
||||
assertEquals("Wrong format for " + format, "17,876", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(17876.000, -1, format));
|
||||
assertEquals("Wrong format for " + format, "9.7", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(9.71, -1, format));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test how we handle negative and zeros.
|
||||
@ -309,7 +318,8 @@ public class TestDataFormatter {
|
||||
//assertEquals("123", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(-123.321, -1, "0 ?/?;0"));
|
||||
|
||||
//Bug54868 patch has a hit on the first string before the ";"
|
||||
assertEquals("-123 1/3", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(-123.321, -1, "0 ?/?;0"));
|
||||
assertEquals("123", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(-123.321, -1, "0 ?/?;0"));
|
||||
assertEquals("123 1/3", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(123.321, -1, "0 ?/?;0"));
|
||||
|
||||
//Bug53150 formatting a whole number with fractions should just give the number
|
||||
assertEquals("1", dfUS.formatRawCellContents(1.0, -1, "# #/#"));
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user