Fix bug #45087 - Correctly detect date formats like [Black]YYYY as being date based
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@660889 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
81f384dabf
commit
50d81039da
@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Don't forget to update status.xml too! -->
|
||||
<release version="3.1-final" date="2008-06-??">
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">45087 - Correctly detect date formats like [Black]YYYY as being date based</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">45060 - Improved token class transformation during formula parsing</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">44840 - Improved handling of HSSFObjectData, especially for entries with data held not in POIFS</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">45043 - Support for getting excel cell comments when extracting text</action>
|
||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
|
||||
<!-- Don't forget to update changes.xml too! -->
|
||||
<changes>
|
||||
<release version="3.1-final" date="2008-06-??">
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="fix">45087 - Correctly detect date formats like [Black]YYYY as being date based</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">45060 - Improved token class transformation during formula parsing</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">44840 - Improved handling of HSSFObjectData, especially for entries with data held not in POIFS</action>
|
||||
<action dev="POI-DEVELOPERS" type="add">45043 - Support for getting excel cell comments when extracting text</action>
|
||||
|
@ -220,9 +220,13 @@ public class HSSFDateUtil
|
||||
// switching stuff, which we can ignore
|
||||
fs = fs.replaceAll(";@", "");
|
||||
|
||||
// If it starts with [$-...], then it is a date, but
|
||||
// If it starts with [$-...], then could be a date, but
|
||||
// who knows what that starting bit is all about
|
||||
fs = fs.replaceAll("\\[\\$\\-.*?\\]", "");
|
||||
fs = fs.replaceAll("^\\[\\$\\-.*?\\]", "");
|
||||
|
||||
// If it starts with something like [Black] or [Yellow],
|
||||
// then it could be a date
|
||||
fs = fs.replaceAll("^\\[[a-zA-Z]+\\]", "");
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, check it's only made up, in any case, of:
|
||||
// y m d h s - / , . :
|
||||
|
@ -257,9 +257,15 @@ public class TestHSSFDateUtil extends TestCase {
|
||||
// (who knows what they mean though...)
|
||||
"[$-F800]dddd\\,\\ mmm\\ dd\\,\\ yyyy",
|
||||
"[$-F900]ddd/mm/yyy",
|
||||
// These ones specify colours, who knew that was allowed?
|
||||
"[BLACK]dddd/mm/yy",
|
||||
"[yeLLow]yyyy-mm-dd"
|
||||
};
|
||||
for(int i=0; i<formats.length; i++) {
|
||||
assertTrue( HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i]) );
|
||||
assertTrue(
|
||||
formats[i] + " is a date format",
|
||||
HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i])
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Then time based ones too
|
||||
@ -270,7 +276,10 @@ public class TestHSSFDateUtil extends TestCase {
|
||||
"mm/dd HH:MM PM", "mm/dd HH:MM pm"
|
||||
};
|
||||
for(int i=0; i<formats.length; i++) {
|
||||
assertTrue( HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i]) );
|
||||
assertTrue(
|
||||
formats[i] + " is a datetime format",
|
||||
HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i])
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Then invalid ones
|
||||
@ -278,10 +287,14 @@ public class TestHSSFDateUtil extends TestCase {
|
||||
"yyyy*mm*dd",
|
||||
"0.0", "0.000",
|
||||
"0%", "0.0%",
|
||||
"[]Foo", "[BLACK]0.00%",
|
||||
"", null
|
||||
};
|
||||
for(int i=0; i<formats.length; i++) {
|
||||
assertFalse( HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i]) );
|
||||
assertFalse(
|
||||
formats[i] + " is not a date or datetime format",
|
||||
HSSFDateUtil.isADateFormat(formatId, formats[i])
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// And these are ones we probably shouldn't allow,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user