PGP keyservers are pieces of sh** when it comes to searching for
subkeys, and only allow it if you submit an 8-character fingerprint
rather than the recommended and less chance of collision 16-character
fingerprint.
Add a second remote lookup for the 8-character version of a key ID if we
don't find anything the first time we look up the key. This fixes
FS#27612 and the deficiency has been sent upstream to the GnuPG users
mailing list as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The absolutely terrible part about this is the failure on GPGME's part
to distinguish between "key not found" and "keyserver timeout". Instead,
it returns the same silly GPG_ERR_EOF in both cases (why isn't
GPG_ERR_TIMEOUT being used?), leaving us helpless to tell them apart.
Spit out a generic enough error message that covers both cases;
unfortunately we can't provide much guidance to the user because we
aren't sure what actually happened.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In the default configuration, we can enter the signing code but still
have nothing to do with GPGME- for example, if database signatures are
optional but none are present. Delay initialization of GPGME until we
know there is a signature file present or we were passed base64-encoded
data.
This also makes debugging with valgrind a lot easier as you don't have
to deal with all the GPGME error noise because their code leaks like a
sieve.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
I'm really good at breaking this on a regular basis. If only we had some
sort of automated testing for this...
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
A few parameters were outdated or wrongly named, and a few things were
explicitly linked that Doxygen wasn't able to resolve.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This adds calls to gpgme_op_import_result() which we were not looking at
before to ensure the key was actually imported. Additionally, we do some
preemptive checks to ensure the keyring is even writable if we are going
to prompt the user to add things to it.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This also fixes a segfault found by dave when key_search is
unsuccessful; the key_search return code documentation has also been
updated to reflect reality.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Because we aren't using gpgv and a dedicated keyring that is known to be
all safe, we should honor this flag being set on a given key in the
keyring to know to not honor it. This prevents a key from being
reimported that a user does not want to be used- instead of deleting,
one should mark it as disabled.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Add two new static methods, key_search() and key_import(), to our
growing list of signing code.
If we come across a key we do not have, attempt to look it up remotely
and ask the user if they wish to import said key. If they do, flag the
validation process as a potential 'retry', meaning it might succeed the
next time it is ran.
These depend on you having a 'keyserver hkp://foo.example.com' line in
your gpg.conf file in your gnupg home directory to function.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
If siglist->results wasn't a NULL pointer, we would try to free it
anyway, even if siglist->count was zero. Only attempt to free this
pointer if we had results and the pointer is valid.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In reality, there is no retrying that happens as of now because we don't
have any import or changing of the keyring going on, but the code is set
up so we can drop this in our new _alpm_process_siglist() function. Wire
up the basics to the sync database validation code, so we see something
like the following:
$ pacman -Ss unknowntrust
error: core: signature from "Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: core: signature from "Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>" is unknown trust
error: database 'core' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))
$ pacman -Ss missingsig
error: core: missing required signature
error: core: missing required signature
error: database 'core' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))
Yes, there is some double output, but this should be fixable in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Neither deltas nor filename attributes are ever present in the local
database, so we can remove all of the indirection for accessing these
attributes.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
I was trying to take a shortcut and not introduce a wrapper struct for
the signature results, so packed it all into alpm_sigresult_t in the
first iteration. However, this is painful when one wants to add new
fields or only return information regarding a single signature.
Refactor the type into a few components which are exposed to the end
user, and will allow a lot more future flexibility. This also exposes
more information regarding the key to the frontend than was previously
available.
The "private" void *data pointer is used by the library to store the
actual key object returned by gpgme; it is typed this way so the
frontend has no expectations of what is there, and so we don't have any
hard gpgme requirement in our public API.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This one wasn't all that necessary as we only used it in one place in
the function, which can be checked easily enough at the call site.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This function is used regardless of whether gpgme support is enabled, so
make sure it is always accessible.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The precedence goes as follows: signature > sha256sum > md5sum
Add some logic and helper methods to check what we have available when
loading a package, and then only check what is necessary to verify the
package. This should speed up sync database verifies as we no longer
will be doing both a checksum and a signature validation.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We may end up allocating 1 or 2 extra bytes this way, but it is worth it
to simplify the method and not have to call base64_decode() a second
time. Use the hueristic that base64 encoding produces 3 bytes of decoded
data for every 4 bytes of encoded data.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This ensures we are actually making correct use of the information gpgme
is returning to us. Marginal being allowed was obvious before, but
Unknown should deal with trust level, and not the presence or lack
thereof of a public key to validate the signature with.
Return status and validity information in two separate values so check
methods and the frontend can use them independently. For now, we treat
expired keys as valid, while expired signatures are invalid.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
If we can't read the keyring, gpgme will output confusing debug
information and fail to verify the signature, so we should log some
debug information.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Show output in -Qip for each package signature, which includes the UID
string from the key ("Joe User <joe@example.com>") and the validity of
said key. Example output:
Signatures : Valid signature from "Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>"
Unknown signature from "<Key Unknown>"
Invalid signature from "Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>"
Also add a backend alpm_sigresult_cleanup() function since memory
allocation took place on this object, and we need some way of freeing
it.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The error code is in fact a bitmask value of an error code and an error
source, so use the proper function to get only the relevant bits. For
the no error case, this shouldn't ever matter, but it bit me when I was
trying to compare the error code to other values and wondered why it
wasn't working, so set a good example.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This gives us more granularity than the former Never/Optional/Always
trifecta. The frontend still uses these values temporarily but that will
be changed in a future patch.
* Use 'siglevel' consistenly in method names, 'level' as variable name
* The level becomes an enum bitmask value for flexibility
* Signature check methods now return a array of status codes rather than
a simple integer success/failure value. This allows callers to
determine whether things such as an unknown signature are valid.
* Specific signature error codes mostly disappear in favor of the above
returned status code; pm_errno is now set only to PKG_INVALID_SIG or
DB_INVALID_SIG as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Change the check into a loop over all signatures present and returned by
GPGME. Also modify the return values and checks slightly now that I know
a little bit more about what type of values are returned.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is more in line with reality and what we have our makepkg, etc.
options named anyway.
Original-patch-by: Kerrick Staley <mail@kerrickstaley.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Don't name static methods with a gpgme_ prefix to avoid confusion with
methods provided by the library. These are static and local to our
file so just give them sane non-prefixed names.
* Rework sigsum_test_bit() to not require assignment.
* Don't balk if there is more than one signature available (for now,
only check the first).
* Fix error codes in publicly visible methods to return -1, not 0, if pkg
or db are not provided.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We didn't do due diligence before and ensure prior pm_errno values
weren't influencing what happened in further ALPM calls. I observed one
case of early setup code setting pm_errno to PM_ERR_WRONG_ARGS and that
flag persisting the entire time we were calling library code.
Add a new CHECK_HANDLE() macro that does two things: 1) ensures the
handle variable passed to it is non-NULL and 2) clears any existing
pm_errno flag set on the handle. This macro can replace many places we
used the ASSERT(handle != NULL, ...) pattern before.
Several other other places only need a simple 'set to zero' of the
pm_errno field.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is the last user of our global handle object. Once again the diff
is large but the functional changes are not.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This requires a lot of line changes, but not many functional changes as
more often than not our handle variable is already available in some
fashion.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The usefulness of this is rather limited due to it not being compiled
into production builds. When you do choose to see the output, it is
often overwhelming and not helpful. The best bet is to use a debugger
and/or well-placed fprintf() statements.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Dan McGee