With libarchive 2.2.3 (previously 1.3.1), archive_read_extract now returns ARCHIVE_WARN
when a package is extracted as user, because for example, UID=0 or SUID bit can't be set.
This patch makes pacman not treating these warnings as errors anymore,
but simply ignoring them.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
I previously introduced some patches to make just about every path in
pacman/libalpm configurable; doing this with the lockfile seemed a bit too
far and we really should just place the lockfile where it belongs- with the
DB that needs locking.
More details in this thread:
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-June/008499.html
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The scriptlet calling had some unneeded complexity for the time being
which we aren't using here. Let's get rid of it until we find a good way
to implement it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
When looking for old packages to create a delta from used bsdtar to read the
packages .PKGINFO to check it's name and arch instead of depending on the
filename of th package.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net>
First reported here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=261861
Newly created files were done with the standard umask, so those that are
extracted seperately and copied to a .pacnew extension will have the wrong
permissions. This should hopefully fix this.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The alpm_splitdep function formerly overwrote the input string, causing
a few issues. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
For future possibilities, don't extract any files that start with '.'.
This will allow us to add features such as the ChangeLog viewing without
having to wait to include these files in packages, because older versions
of pacman will be forward compatable with 'hidden' files at the root level
of the package.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This was a bad way to fix a problem upstream. Doing this resulted in
symlink permissions being applied to files installed on the system, leaving
some binaries with 77 permission, etc.
This reverts commit 4e6b7c1cde.
Refactor the goto cleanup; statements out of add.c and remove.c, and move
what the cleanup: label did into a function.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The last typo fix for conflicts wasn't complete,
it only fixed one occurence of the conflicts variable, instead of the two :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-May/008222.html
This caused all conflicts statement to be ignored, so all databases
will need to be rebuilt with a fixed repo-add.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Re-add some checks for a valid target list. In addition, move variable
declarations to the most local scope possible, which should help in finding
errors that were previously uncaught.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Move a lot of the operations that pacman query performs into their own
functions for ease of following the flow and for possible later merges with
their sync counterparts. We need to think less in terms of operations and
more in term of overall concepts.
Also (re)introduced checks for the target list on a -Q operation, ensuring
that we only call certain query operations when it is sane to do so.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This function is an absolute disaster, so we'll take it one step at a time
here. This was a quick once-over of the whole thing, trying to straighten
out some of the spaghetti code and fix some mistakes that others found.
We are now down to two failing pactests again: sync300 and upgrade051.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
As described in the bug report, installing taglib-rcc (sync900 pactest)
works fine. But installing taglib back (sync901 pactest) doesn't.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Same as remove040, with cascaded remove instead of simple remove.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This should hopefully allow multiple cache dirs to be specified in
pacman.conf and/or on the command line, and allow pacman to test
each one for the package file. The first one found to be writeable is
used as the download cache.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
