Add -v, mention delta support (other than -d), and split
repo-add-specific options out from those common to repo-add and
repo-remove.
Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler <ataraxia937@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In order to be fully secure, we can't only sign packages. We also need
to sign our repository metadata to prevent database falsification,
dependency injection, etc. Add an '-s/--sign' option that allows this
functionality, and will generate a .sig file side-by-side with the
package database.
While at it, fix the issue where a signature file would never be found
because of 'cd' madness (this needs fixing in another commit).
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Now the comment was showing up in the generated manpage and HTML
documentation. Just kill it as asciidoc keeps screwing us over.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
They are pretty noisy scripts in their normal course of operations, so allow
all messages to be squashed except for warning and error messages with this
new flag.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The force option should only be specified in the PKGBUILD with
options=(force). This information should be handled like any other meta
info, and there is no need to have a special repo-add option for it.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: fix up a few more references in contrib/ scripts, etc]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Between AsciiDoc 8.2.2 and 8.2.3, the following change was made to the stock
Asciidoc configuration:
@@ -149,7 +153,10 @@
# Inline macros.
# Backslash prefix required for escape processing.
# (?s) re flag for line spanning.
-(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>\w(\w|-)*?):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])=
+
+# Explicit so they can be nested.
+(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>(http|https|ftp|file|mailto|callto|image|link)):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])=
+
# Anchor: [[[id]]]. Bibliographic anchor.
(?su)[\\]?\[\[\[(?P<attrlist>[\w][\w-]*?)\]\]\]=anchor3
# Anchor: [[id,xreflabel]]
This default regex now matches explicit values, and unfortunately in this
case manlink was being matched by just 'link', causing the wrong inline
macro template to be applied. By renaming the macro, we can avoid being
matched by the wrong regex.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We still need some work here- we should have a repo-remove manpage link
to this one, and we should not have to struggle with asciidoc formatting
to get it to work like any other multiple-command manpage works.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
