Forcing vim users to view files with a tabstop of 2 seems really
unnecessary when noet is set. I find it much easier to read code with
ts=4 and I dislike having to override the modeline by hand.
Command run:
find . -type f -exec sed -i '/vim.* noet/s# ts=2 sw=2##' {} +
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Function pointer gets uselessly compared for NULL in
every iteration. Move the condition to do it just once.
Signed-off-by: slavomir vlcek <svlc@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Add 2012 to the copyright range for all libalpm and pacman source files.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Very rarely a segfault would occur when removing a number of packages
due to a corrupted list for the local database (FS#27805, FS#28195).
This was caused by the alpm_list_msort function not correctly dealing
with the two new head node's prev values.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This reduces the number of functions we call by log(n) in this function,
and the inlined version is trivial and barely increases the size of the
function.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This one is pretty darn useless. Just derefence the ->data attribute
since the type is public anyway and save yourself the function call.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
In every case we were calling calloc, the struct we allocated (or the
memory to be used) is fully specified later in the method.
For alpm_list_t allocations, we always set all of data, next, and prev.
For list copying and transforming to an array, we always copy the entire
data element, so no need to zero it first.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
A few parameters were outdated or wrongly named, and a few things were
explicitly linked that Doxygen wasn't able to resolve.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Improved alpm_list_mmerge() performance by removing an extra
pass to obtain the tail node.
This was actually suggested by a TODO comment.
Signed-off-by: Diogo Sousa <diogogsousa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This accomplishes quite a few things with one rather invasive change.
1. Iteration is much more performant, due to a reduction in pointer
chasing and linear item access.
2. Data structures are smaller- we no longer have the overhead of the
linked list as the file struts are now laid out consecutively in
memory.
3. Memory allocation has been massively reworked. Before, we would
allocate three different pieces of memory per file item- the list
struct, the file struct, and the copied filename. What this resulted
in was massive fragmentation of memory when loading filelists since
the memory allocator had to leave holes all over the place. The new
situation here now removes the need for any list item allocation;
allocates the file structs in contiguous memory (and reallocs as
necessary), leaving only the strings as individually allocated. Tests
using valgrind (massif) show some pretty significant memory
reductions on the worst case `pacman -Ql > /dev/null` (366387 files
on my machine):
Before:
Peak heap: 54,416,024 B
Useful heap: 36,840,692 B
Extra heap: 17,575,332 B
After:
Peak heap: 38,004,352 B
Useful heap: 28,101,347 B
Extra heap: 9,903,005 B
Several small helper methods have been introduced, including a list to
array conversion helper as well as a filelist merge sort that works
directly on arrays.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We can readily detect the first node in a list by checking if
node->prev->next is NULL. So there is no need to pass the head
of the list to this function and its prototype now looks like
all the other item accessors.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The only thing this accessor did was remove the const qualifier
given our entire list implementation requires passing around the
head anyway.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This does touch a lot of things, and hopefully doesn't break things on
other platforms, but allows us to also clean up a bunch of crud that no
longer needs to be there.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is the standard, and we have had a few of these introduced lately
that should not be here.
Done with:
find -name '*.c' | xargs sed -i -e 's#if (#if(#g'
find -name '*.c' | xargs sed -i -e 's#while (#while(#g'
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This was discussed and more or less agreed upon on the mailing list. A
huge checkin, but if we just do it and let people adjust the pain will
end soon enough. Rebasing should be relatively straighforward for anyone
that sees conflicts; just be sure you use the new return style if
possible.
The following semantic patch was used to do the change, along with some
hand-massaging in order to preserve parenthesis where appropriate:
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows, although some
hand-massaging was done in order to keep parenthesis where appropriate:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression a;
@@
- return(a);
+ return a;
// </smpl>
A macros_file was also provided with the following content:
Additional steps taken, mainly for ASSERT() macros:
$ sed -i -e 's#return(NULL)#return NULL#' lib/libalpm/*.c
$ sed -i -e 's#return(-1)#return -1#' lib/libalpm/*.c
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This takes in the list and a list item, and does the pointer dance necessary
to remove it from the list regardless of whether it is first, last, or
somewhere in the middle. It is useful for callers that already know what
item needs to be removed and have a pointer to it rather than doing a search
by data that the plain alpm_list_remove() does.
Refactor alpm_list_remove() to use this function as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
There is a lot of swtiching between size_t and int for alpm_list sizes
in the codebase. Start converting these to all be size_t by adjusting
the return type of alpm_list_count and fixing all additional warnings
given by -Wconversion that are generated by this change.
Dan: a few more small changes to ensure things compile, adjusting some
printf format string characters to accommodate the larger size on x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is more efficient than alpm_list_diff since it assumes the two lists
are sorted. And also we get the two sides of the diff.
Even sorting should more efficient than the current list_diff. Sorting the
two lists should be O(n*log(n)+m*log(m)) while the current list_diff is
O(n*m). So I also reimplemented list_diff using list_diff_sorted.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
A NULL list element triggered an infinite loop. Not cool :)
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
So if you want to remove NULL needle from a list, alpm_list_remove will
return with "not found".
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* remove obsolete and unused *_cmp helper functions like deppkg_cmp and
_alpm_grp_cmp
* new alpm_list_remove_str function, used 6 times in handle.c
* remove _alpm_prov_cmp / _alpm_db_whatprovides and replace them by
a more general alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers with a cleaner implementation.
before: alpm_db_whatprovides(db, targ)
after: alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers(alpm_db_getpkgcache(db), targ)
* remove satisfycmp and replace alpm_list_find + satisfycmp usage by
_alpm_find_dep_satisfiers.
before : alpm_list_find(_alpm_db_get_pkgcache(db), dep, satisfycmp)
after : _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers(_alpm_db_get_pkgcache(db), dep)
* remove _alpm_pkgname_pkg_cmp, which was used with alpm_list_remove, and
use _alpm_pkg_find + alpm_list_remove with _alpm_pkg_cmp instead.
This commit actually get rids of all complicated and asymmetric _cmp
functions. I first thought these functions were worth it, be caused it
allowed us to reuse list_find and list_remove. But this was at the detriment
of the clarity and also the ease of use of these functions, dangerous
because of their asymmetricity.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Remove some #include statements that are not strictly necessary
* Remove node_new function that is really just a one-liner
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Introduces 'list == NULL' convention for empty list. That means
alpm_list_new isn't needed anymore, so kill it
* Small straightforward fixes in alpm_list.c
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Update the GPL boilerplate to direct people to the GNU website for a copy of
the license, as well as bump all of Judd's copyrights to 2007.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
alpm_list_find and alpm_list_find_ptr will now return a void *, and
alpm_list_find_str will return a char *, instead of an int.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The old alpm_list_find was renamed to alpm_list_find_ptr, and a new
alpm_list_find was introduced, which uses the fn comparison-function
parameter in its decision.
Now both alpm_list_find_ptr (a new ptrcmp helper function was also
added) and alpm_list_find_str are just an alpm_list_find call.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: made ptrcmp a static function]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
So I spent a good 4 hours tracking a bug down tonight due to
alpm_list_copy_data not actually doing what I expected to do. We can't find
the size of an object we don't know the type of, so rewrite it so we pass
in the size explicitly. This was making _alpm_pkg_dup fail and causing all
sorts of other issues.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
It's time to define that alpm_list_add(list, foo) adds 'foo' to the end of
'list' and returns with 'list', because:
1. list is a list, not a set.
2. sortbydeps _needs_ an alpm_list_add definition to work properly.
As a first step, I used this definition in recursedeps.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Dan: punctuation cleanup in commit message and code comments, added comment
to alpm_list_add]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Commit 2ee90ddae2 did a special check to see
if we were removing the head node, but not the tail node. Add a special case
for the tail node to ensure all relevant pointers get updated.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
List head nodes contain null 'prev' pointer, which we can (ab)use to maintain a
back reference to the tail pointer of the list.
While list additions are not _significantly_ improved, they are still sped up.
Original
$ time pacman -Qo /usr/bin/wtpt
/usr/bin/wtpt is owned by lcms 1.17-2
real 0m3.623s
user 0m1.883s
sys 0m1.473s
New
$ time pacman -Qo /usr/bin/wtpt
/usr/bin/wtpt is owned by lcms 1.17-2
real 0m2.006s
user 0m0.263s
sys 0m1.627s
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
Package dup needs to copy all members. Nathan had his implementation, but
I generalized it to this new alpm_list function (and will use it in the
next commit).
CC: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
