Both currently marked as failing.
* sync303.py encapsulates the broken behavior reported in FS#27214.
* sync304.py shows how packages depending on a specific version of a
package in SyncFirst can cause breakage of the dependency resolver.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is work originally provided by Sascha Kruse on FS#20360 with only
minor adjustments to the implementation. It's been expanded to cover:
NoUpgrade, NoExtract, IgnorePkg, IgnoreGroup.
Adds tests ignore008, sync139, sync502, and sync503.
Also satisfies FS#18988.
Original-work-by: Sascha Kruse <knopwob@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
There aretwo seperate issues in the same block of file conflict
checking code here:
1) If realpath errored, such as when a symlink was broken, we would call
'continue' rather than simply exit this particular method of
resolution. This was likely just a copy-paste mistake as the previous
resolving steps all use loops where continue makes sense. Refactor
the check so we only proceed if realpath is successful, and continue
with the rest of the checks either way.
2) The real problem this code was trying to solve was canonicalizing
path component (e.g., directory) symlinks. The final component, if
not a directory, should not be handled at all in this loop. Add a
!S_ISLNK() condition to the loop so we only call this for real files.
There are few other small cleanups to the debug messages that I made
while debugging this problem- we don't need to keep printing the file
name, and ensure every block that sets resolved_conflict to true prints
a debug message so we know how it was resolved.
This fixes the expected failures from symlink010.py and symlink011.py,
while still ensuring the fix for fileconflict007.py works.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
These should all prevent installation, and yet two of the three tests
currently fail. Not good.
The best way to see what is going on here is to diff the three new tests
side by side- there is only a small difference between the three tests,
and that is in the destination of the symlink in question that should
never be overwritten.
symlink010.py: myprogsuffix -> myprog
symlink011.py: myprogsuffix -> broken
symlink012.py: myprogsuffix -> otherprog
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is not something that should be used on a frequent basis, and
giving it a short option encourages use without making the drawbacks
obvious. For the 1% of situations that require it, the 5 extra
keystrokes are a fair price to pay.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Make the output into a single block and add separators at the end
so that they do not merge into each other.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Since c51b9ca, ldconfig.stub is required by pactest so we need to
include it as part of the dist tarball.
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This removes the last usages of this rule that aren't explicitly looking
at real output from pacman. Notably, these tests depended on one
particular debug logger not ever being changed, which is too fragile,
not to mention doesn't work at all with --nolog.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This will work fine on x86_64 (or any platform that has a 64 bit long),
but currently fails on i686. This test also stresses the recent changes
to accommodate package size values greater than a 32 bit UINT_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This actually does something in a scriptlet we can check with our normal
set of rules, rather than relying on pacman debug output.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We had this interesting set of facts conundrum, according to vercmp
return values:
2.0a < 2.0
2.0 < 2.0.a
2.0a == 2.0.a
This introduces a code change that ensures '2.0a < 2.0.a' as would be
expected by the first two comparisons. Unfortunately this stays us a bit
further from upstream RPM code, but those are the breaks (in RPM, the
versions involving 'a' do in fact compare the same, but they are both
greater than the bare '2.0').
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
When we switched to using alpm_depcmp() in resolving replacments, we had
some interesting behavior with regard to providers and packages not
found in repositories. Teach the replacement resolving code to not look
at provisions at all to be slightly more sane.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
These are equivalent. Use the autoconf macro for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We can't just check for LIBS as curl won't be listed. Instead, look at
the length of the LIBCURL var from the Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is done extremely crudely and is not very efficient, but it does
push us down the path of being closer to right, as one additional test
now passes.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
It turns out we have a few problems here which are best tackled
independently. The first is simply parsing replacements as dep strings;
the second will be dealing with replaces when the original package name
still exists in the repository.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We were doing some really silly stuff before and abusing the os.walk()
call, having to walk the entire local database for every single PKG
rule. We really only need top level directories, and we can cache any
generated package since calls to db_read() are well-defined and only
happen in one place.
This speeds up the running of tests that may want to add 100 PKG_VERSION
rules at once, where before we had to limit how many we used in order to
not put a serious cramp in the speed of the test suite run.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Note that this is meant to exercise pacsort more than the underlying
version comparsion; that is better left to the standalone vercmptest.sh
test script.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Add code to conf.c that parses the new SigLevel directive. An
overwhelming number of options are presented, but most users will still
be fine with the Never/Optional/Required trio. More advanced users can
combine these or any of the other options on a 'SigLevel = ' line, which
is parsed in a left-to-right fashion and flags turned on and off
accordingly. For example, all three of these will net the same config:
SigLevel = Required PackageOptional
SigLevel = Optional DatabaseRequired
SigLevel = DatabaseRequired PackageOptional
Additionally, database-specific lines assume you wish to start with any
global default that has been set. For example, if any of the above lines
were in the [options] section, something such as:
SigLevel = PackageRequired PackageAllowMarginal
Would continue to enforce required database signatures.
Inspiration-by: Kerrick Staley <mail@kerrickstaley.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
We don't write with extra or unknown whitespace, so there is little
reason for us to trim it when reading either. This also fixes the
hopefully never encountered "paths that start or end with spaces" issue,
for which two pactests have been added. The tests also contain other
evil characters that we have encountered before and handle just fine,
but it doesn't hurt to ensure we don't break such support in the future.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is more in line with standard Python practice, and makes keyboard
interrupts behave a lot more sanely. It also prevents the useless
spawning of a shell as well as simplifies the command building and
working directory stuff.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This addresses FS#25141. We shouldn't remove every empty directory we
come across during the removal process unless it is truly not known to
any other package. This will prevent removal of essential directories
such as '/var/lock/'.
This is accomplished by first checking the empty/non-empty status of a
directory, which was previously done implicitly by calling rmdir() and
ignoring errors. We do this to avoid the next (new) check in most cases,
which is to look at all local packages to see if the to-be-removed
directory is present in another packages' filelist. If we do not find it
anywhere, then we remove it, else we keep the file around.
The pactest has been updated to test more cases, as well as finding a
flaw in the original expected to fail case- we need separate DIR and
FILE based EXIST rules.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
The bulk of this commit is adding new tests to ensure the new behavior
works without disrupting old behavior. This is a relatively sane maneuver
when a package adds a conf file (e.g. '/etc/mercurial/hgrc') that was
not previously in the package, but it is placed in the backup array. In
essence, we can treat the existing file as having always been a part of
the package and do our normal compare/install as pacnew logic checks.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is similar to what was just done for the sync databases. Move a few
pieces around so we never need to actually write out the filesystem to
create a package, and simply stream the tarfile out from the data we've
collected.
Once again, a few newline addition hacks and other things have to be
left in place in order not to break everything; this time however most
of the assumptions are in pactest and not libalpm.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This addresses FS#24904. In a normal upgrade case, this replacement
seems to work just fine. However, when doing a sync "replace" type
upgrade, we weren't properly handling this edge case due to path
comparison not ignoring trailing slashes. Fix this by pruning any
trailing slashes past a certain point of file conflict resolution where
we no longer need them, which allows us to safely detect cases such as
now tested in the new pactest.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Start by converting all of our flags to a 'status' bitmask (pkgcache
status, grpcache status). Add a new 'valid' flag as well. This will let
us keep track if the database itself has been marked valid in whatever
fashion.
For local databases at the moment we ensure there are no depends files;
for sync databases we ensure the PGP signature is valid if
required/requested. The loading of the pkgcache is prohibited if the
database is invalid.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
This is the ideal place to do it as all clients should be checking the
return value and ensuring there are no errors. This is similar to
pkg_load().
We also add an additional step of validation after we download a new
database; a subsequent '-y' operation can potentially invalidate the
original check at registration time.
Note that this implementation is still a bit naive; if a signature is
invalid it is currently impossible to refresh and re-download the file
without manually deleting it first. Similarly, if one downloads a
database and the check fails, the database object is still there and can
be used. These shortcomings will be addressed in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Sync database are no longer exploded on the filesystem. Rework the logic
used to generate our test databases so we can create them completely in
memory without having to write the individual files to disk at all. The
local database is unaffected.
Note that several shortcomings in libalpm parsing were discovered by
this change, which have since been temporarily patched around in this
test suite:
* archive_fgets() did not properly handle a file that ended in a
non-newline, and would silently drop the data in this line.
* sync database with only the file entries and not the directories would
fail to parse properly, and even cause segfaults in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
test/pacman/README mentioned the -A flag, which no longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Kerrick Staley <mail@kerrickstaley.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
