Merge branch 'development' of github.com:open-keychain/open-keychain into development

This commit is contained in:
Dominik Schürmann 2015-03-15 19:35:12 +01:00
commit d824ec3bc9
2 changed files with 21 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -536,6 +536,12 @@ public class PgpKeyOperationTest {
expiry, modified.getPublicKey(keyId).getUnsafeExpiryTimeForTesting().getTime() / 1000);
Assert.assertEquals("modified key must have same flags as before",
ring.getPublicKey(keyId).getKeyUsage(), modified.getPublicKey(keyId).getKeyUsage());
Date date = modified.canonicalize(new OperationLog(), 0).getPublicKey().getExpiryTime();
Assert.assertNotNull("modified key must have an expiry date", date);
Assert.assertEquals("modified key must have expected expiry date",
expiry, date.getTime() / 1000);
}
{

View File

@ -126,27 +126,28 @@ public class CanonicalizedPublicKey extends UncachedPublicKey {
// the getValidSeconds method is unreliable for master keys. we need to iterate all
// user ids, then use the most recent certification from a non-revoked user id
if (isMasterKey()) {
Date latestCreation = null;
seconds = 0;
long masterKeyId = getKeyId();
Date latestCreation = null;
for (byte[] rawUserId : getUnorderedRawUserIds()) {
Iterator<WrappedSignature> sigs = getSignaturesForRawId(rawUserId);
// there is always a certification, so this call is safe
while (sigs.hasNext()) {
WrappedSignature sig = sigs.next();
// we know a user id has at most two sigs: one certification, one revocation.
// if the sig is a revocation, or there is another sig (which is a revocation),
// the data in this uid is not relevant
if (sig.isRevocation() || sigs.hasNext()) {
if (sig.getKeyId() != masterKeyId) {
continue;
}
if (sig.isRevocation()) {
continue;
}
// this is our revocation, UNLESS there is a newer certificate!
if (latestCreation == null || latestCreation.before(sig.getCreationTime())) {
latestCreation = sig.getCreationTime();
seconds = sig.getKeyExpirySeconds();
}
}
}
} else {
seconds = mPublicKey.getValidSeconds();