mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/minetest
synced 2024-11-05 08:55:01 -05:00
PcgRandom: Fix/improve documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
dfbdb5bcd7
commit
8ed467d438
@ -2865,7 +2865,9 @@ It can be created via `PcgRandom(seed)` or `PcgRandom(seed, sequence)`.
|
||||
* `next()`: return next integer random number [`-2147483648`...`2147483647`]
|
||||
* `next(min, max)`: return next integer random number [`min`...`max`]
|
||||
* `rand_normal_dist(min, max, num_trials=6)`: return normally distributed random number [`min`...`max`]
|
||||
* This is only a rough approximation of a normal distribution with mean=(max-min)/2 and variance=1
|
||||
* This is only a rough approximation of a normal distribution with:
|
||||
* mean = (max - min) / 2, and
|
||||
* variance = (((max - min + 1) ^ 2) - 1) / (12 * num_trials)
|
||||
* Increasing num_trials improves accuracy of the approximation
|
||||
|
||||
### `SecureRandom`
|
||||
|
@ -93,22 +93,31 @@ u32 PcgRandom::range(u32 bound)
|
||||
// If the bound is 0, we cover the whole RNG's range
|
||||
if (bound == 0)
|
||||
return next();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
If the bound is not a multiple of the RNG's range, it may cause bias,
|
||||
e.g. a RNG has a range from 0 to 3 and we take want a number 0 to 2.
|
||||
Using rand() % 3, the number 0 would be twice as likely to appear.
|
||||
With a very large RNG range, the effect becomes less prevalent but
|
||||
still present. This can be solved by modifying the range of the RNG
|
||||
to become a multiple of bound by dropping values above the a threshold.
|
||||
In our example, threshold == 4 - 3 = 1 % 3 == 1, so reject 0, thus
|
||||
making the range 3 with no bias.
|
||||
|
||||
This loop looks dangerous, but will always terminate due to the
|
||||
RNG's property of uniformity.
|
||||
/*
|
||||
This is an optimization of the expression:
|
||||
0x100000000ull % bound
|
||||
since 64-bit modulo operations typically much slower than 32.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
u32 threshold = -bound % bound;
|
||||
u32 r;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
If the bound is not a multiple of the RNG's range, it may cause bias,
|
||||
e.g. a RNG has a range from 0 to 3 and we take want a number 0 to 2.
|
||||
Using rand() % 3, the number 0 would be twice as likely to appear.
|
||||
With a very large RNG range, the effect becomes less prevalent but
|
||||
still present.
|
||||
|
||||
This can be solved by modifying the range of the RNG to become a
|
||||
multiple of bound by dropping values above the a threshold.
|
||||
|
||||
In our example, threshold == 4 % 3 == 1, so reject values < 1
|
||||
(that is, 0), thus making the range == 3 with no bias.
|
||||
|
||||
This loop may look dangerous, but will always terminate due to the
|
||||
RNG's property of uniformity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while ((r = next()) < threshold)
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user