Instead, have K9.onCreate initialize the location of the key
store file (similar to what is done with
BinaryTempFileBody.setTempDirectory).
Also, LocalKeyStore.getInstance has been changed so that it
no longer needs to be synchronized.
The classes are just as much related to com.fsck.k9.mail.transport
as com.fsck.k9.mail.store, so having them in
com.fsck.k9.mail.store doesn't seem appropriate.
Move LocalKeyStore to com.fsck.k9.security
Move TrustManagerFactory and TrustedSocketFactory to com.fsck.k9.net.ssl
Also, implement the ability to configure an alternate key store
file location. This permits the running of unit tests without
clobbering the live key store file.
Also, add a test to confirm that the key store file is being written
out and reread correctly.
Proper host name validation was not being performed for certificates
kept in the local keystore. If an attacker could convince a user to
accept and store an attacker's certificate, then that certificate
could be used for MITM attacks, giving the attacker access to all
connections to all servers in all accounts in K-9.
This commit changes how the certificates are stored. Previously, an
entire certificate chain was stored for a server (and any of those
certificates in the chain were available for validating signatures on
certificates received when connecting). Now just the single
certificate for the server is stored.
This commit changes how locally stored certificates are retrieved.
They can only be retrieved using the host:port that the user
configured for the server.
This also fixes issue 1326. Users can now use different certificates
for different servers on the same host (listening to different ports).
The above changes mean that users might have to re-accept certificates
that they had previously accepted and are still using (but only if the
certificate's Subject doesn't match the host that they are connecting
to).
This commit modifies AccountSetupBasics so that it now calls
AccountSetupCheckSettings twice -- once for checking the incoming
settings and once for the outgoing settings. Otherwise, an exception
could occur while checking incoming settings, the user could say
continue (or the user could accept a certificate key), and the
outgoing settings would not be checked. This also helps with
determining if a certificate exception was for the incoming or
outgoing server, which is needed if the user decides to add the
certificate to the keystore.
If you attempted to use SSL to connect to a server that speaks
STARTTLS, you should get an SSL protocol error. Instead, you
were likely to get an "Unrecognized Certificate" error that shows
you an unrelated certificate chain and asks you to accept it or
reject it. Neither action would work because the actual problem
had nothing to do with certificates. The unrelated certificate
chain that popped up had been statically stored when validating
a prior connection to a different server.
With this patch, certificate chains are no longer stored statically
when validating server connections.
Issue 5886 is an example of a user experiencing this problem.
The commit that introduced those notifications also introduced a rather
... interesting design pattern: The CertificateValidationException
notified the user of its pure existance - it's no longer a 'message'
only, but defines policy. As this is more than unusual, replace this
pattern by the MessagingController treating
CertificateValidationException specially when accessing remote folders.
Also make clear which account failed when constructing the notification.
With this fix, a CertPathValidatorException or CertificateException will
create a "Certificate error: Check your server settings" notification
in the status bar. When the user clicks on the notification, they are
taken to the appropriate server settings screen where they can review their
settings and can accept a different server certificate.
- Created "controller" and "mail.filter" package
- Moved a lot of classes to new/other packages
- Removed unused classes: NoSuchProviderException, MessageDateComparator
Fixes Issue 1577
Issue 1551:
Some IMAP servers send untagged EXPUNGEs to IDLEing
clients without ever haven't sent an untagged FETCH. The untagged
EXPUNGEs are harder to deal with because they don't have a UID. So,
if the user has elected to have the IDLE connection start with a poll,
we can maintain a map of message sequence numbers to UIDs that we can
use to figure out which message to delete. To mitigate the risk of
the map falling out of date, we do a UID SEARCH UID before removing
the local copy of the message, just to make sure the message is really
gone from the server. If we detect an error, do another poll to
resync the map.
Issue 1577:
Restore the removal of notifications for an account when the account's
unread message count goes to 0.
Fixes Issue 1278
Fixes Issue 119
Fixes Issue 1077
Fixes Issue 1238
Worked performed by danapple0 and cketti in
https://k9mail.googlecode.com/svn/k9mail/branches/issue1116
Add support for most batch ops (except move and copy) in search
results. Add support for batch move and copy on real folders.
Increase efficiency of bulk IMAP moves and copies by doing as multiple
UID operations.
Eliminated serialization of Account objects.
Provide up-references in useful places to make all future code cleaner
and more efficient.
Fixed a bunch of draft handling
Merged from issue1116 branch, except for Account.java, which was
copied wholesale. Account.java was manually merged in issue1116
branch at r1489
svn merge -r 1459:1489 https://k9mail.googlecode.com/svn/k9mail/branches/issue1116 .
cp ../issue1116/src/com/fsck/k9/Account.java src/com/fsck/k9/Account.java
Joe Steele