1
0
mirror of https://github.com/moparisthebest/k-9 synced 2024-11-27 11:42:16 -05:00

Stop service(s) if not in use - Fixes Issue 2777

This commit is contained in:
Christian Knecht 2011-09-04 16:00:02 -04:00 committed by Jesse Vincent
parent 1b7481f854
commit 7cd6334c64
4 changed files with 191 additions and 82 deletions

View File

@ -17,14 +17,66 @@ import com.fsck.k9.controller.MessagingController;
import com.fsck.k9.helper.power.TracingPowerManager;
import com.fsck.k9.helper.power.TracingPowerManager.TracingWakeLock;
/**
* Note: All documentation in this file market <CK:RE> is documentation written by Christian Knecht by reverse engineering.
* This documentation is without warranty and may not be accurate nor reflect the author's original intent.
*
* <CK:RE>
* CoreService is the base class for all K9 Services.
*
* An Android service is a way to model a part of an application that needs to accomplish certain tasks without the
* UI part of the application being necessarily active (of course an application could also be a pure service, without
* any UI; this is not the case of K9). By declaring a service and starting it, the OS knows that the application has
* work to do and should avoid killing the process.
*
* A service's main purpose is to do some task (usually in the background) which requires one of more threads. The
* thread that starts the service is the same as the UI thread of the process. It should thus not be used to run
* the tasks.
*
* CoreService is providing the execution plumbing for background tasks including the required thread and task queuing
* for all K9 services to use.
*
* A service is supposed to run only as long as it has some work to do whether that work is active processing or some
* just some monitoring, like listening on a network port for incoming connections or listing on an open network
* connection for incoming data (push mechanism).
*
* To make sure the service is running only when required, is must be shutdown after tasks are done. As the
* execution of tasks is abstracted away in this class, it also proper shutdown handling if approriate. If
* the Service requires this is should call enableAutoShutdown(true) in it's onCreate() method.
*
* While a service is running it's tasks, it is usually not a good idea to let the device go to sleep more.
* WakeLocks are used to avoid this. CoreService provides a central registry (singleton) that can be used
* application-wide to store WakeLocks.
*
* In short, CoreService provides the following features to K9 Services:
* - task execution and queuing
* - Service life cycle management (insures the service is stopped when not needed anymore); disabled by default
* - WakeLock registry and management
*
* </CK:RE>
*/
public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
public static String WAKE_LOCK_ID = "com.fsck.k9.service.CoreService.wakeLockId";
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, TracingWakeLock> wakeLocks = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, TracingWakeLock>();
private static AtomicInteger wakeLockSeq = new AtomicInteger(0);
private ExecutorService threadPool = null;
public static String WAKE_LOCK_ID = "com.fsck.k9.service.CoreService.wakeLockId"; // CK:Intent attribute ID
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, TracingWakeLock> wakeLocks = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, TracingWakeLock>(); // CK:WakeLocks registry
private static AtomicInteger wakeLockSeq = new AtomicInteger(0); // CK:WakeLock registry
private ExecutorService threadPool = null; // CK:Threadpool with a single thread; used to execute and queue background actions inside the service
private final String className = getClass().getName();
private volatile boolean mShutdown = false;
private volatile boolean mShutdown = false; // CK:A:Seems to be used only when the service is "officially" shutdown to make sure that an exception raise because of the shutdown gets ignored.
/**
* CK:BF:2777
* Controls the auto-shutdown mechanism of the service. The default service life-cycle model is that the service should run
* only as long as a task is running. If a service should behave differently, disable auto-shutdown.
*/
private boolean mAutoShutdown = true;
/**
* CK:BF:2777
* This variable is part of the auto-shutdown feature and determines whether the service has to be shutdown at the
* end of the onStart() method or not.
*/
protected boolean mImmediateShutdown = true; //
@Override
public void onCreate() {
@ -35,32 +87,70 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
}
protected static void addWakeLockId(Intent i, Integer wakeLockId) {
/**
* CK:DocAdded,Refactored without change of logic
* Adds an existing WakeLock identified by it's WakeLock-ID to the specified Intent.
* @param i
* @param wakeLockId
*/
protected static void addWakeLockId(Context context, Intent i, Integer wakeLockId, boolean createIfNotExists) {
if (wakeLockId != null) {
i.putExtra(BootReceiver.WAKE_LOCK_ID, wakeLockId);
return;
}
if (createIfNotExists)
addWakeLock(context,i);
}
/**
* CK:DocAdded
* Adds a new WakeLock to the intent.
* This will add the WakeLock to the central WakeLock registry managed by this class.
* @param context Required to be able to create a new wake-lock.
* @param i Intent to which to add the WakeLock (CK:Q:still unclear why we need to link Intents and WakeLocks)
*/
protected static void addWakeLock(Context context, Intent i) {
TracingPowerManager pm = TracingPowerManager.getPowerManager(context);
TracingWakeLock wakeLock = pm.newWakeLock(PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, "CoreService addWakeLock");
wakeLock.setReferenceCounted(false);
wakeLock.acquire(K9.MAIL_SERVICE_WAKE_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
Integer tmpWakeLockId = wakeLockSeq.getAndIncrement();
wakeLocks.put(tmpWakeLockId, wakeLock);
TracingWakeLock wakeLock = acquireWakeLock(context,"CoreService addWakeLock",K9.MAIL_SERVICE_WAKE_LOCK_TIMEOUT); // CK:Q: What this timeout? 30secs seems a bizarre choice. It it's a safeguard it should be longer, if it's to cover the real time required by some operation, it seems too short (though I say this before knowing really what the service is supposed to do)
Integer tmpWakeLockId = registerWakeLock(wakeLock);
i.putExtra(WAKE_LOCK_ID, tmpWakeLockId);
}
/**
* CK:Added as result of refactoring; logic is unchanged
* Register WakeLock and returns its registry-entry-ID
* @param wakeLock
* @return
* AUTHOR chrisk
*/
protected static Integer registerWakeLock(TracingWakeLock wakeLock) {
Integer tmpWakeLockId = wakeLockSeq.getAndIncrement();
wakeLocks.put(tmpWakeLockId, wakeLock);
return tmpWakeLockId;
}
/**
* CK:Added as result of refactoring; logic is unchanged
* Acquires a WakeLock in a K9 standard way
* @param context
* @return
* AUTHOR chrisk
*/
protected static TracingWakeLock acquireWakeLock(Context context, String tag, long timeout) {
TracingPowerManager pm = TracingPowerManager.getPowerManager(context);
TracingWakeLock wakeLock = pm.newWakeLock(PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, tag);
wakeLock.setReferenceCounted(false);
wakeLock.acquire(timeout);
return wakeLock;
}
@Override
public void onStart(Intent intent, int startId) {
TracingPowerManager pm = TracingPowerManager.getPowerManager(this);
TracingWakeLock wakeLock = pm.newWakeLock(PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, "CoreService onStart");
wakeLock.setReferenceCounted(false);
wakeLock.acquire(K9.MAIL_SERVICE_WAKE_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
// CK:DocAdded:deprecated method but still used for backwards compatibility with Android version <2.0
// CK:DocAdded: Manage wake-locks, especially, release any wake-locks held so far and define a new "local" wake lock.
// Also, because we create a new wakelock, we re-initialize the wakelock timeout and give
// the service-start code a protection of up to MAIL_SERVICE_WAKE_LOCK_TIMEOUT (currently 30s).
TracingWakeLock wakeLock = acquireWakeLock(this,"CoreService onStart",K9.MAIL_SERVICE_WAKE_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "CoreService: " + className + ".onStart(" + intent + ", " + startId);
@ -81,20 +171,30 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
}
}
// CK:DocAdded: Run the actual start-code of the service
mImmediateShutdown = true;
try {
super.onStart(intent, startId);
startService(intent, startId);
} finally {
wakeLock.release();
try{wakeLock.release();} catch (Exception e) {/* ignore */}
try{if (mAutoShutdown && mImmediateShutdown && startId != -1) stopSelf(startId);} catch (Exception e) {/* ignore */}
}
}
public void execute(Context context, final Runnable runner, int wakeLockTime, final Integer startId) {
/**
*
* @param context
* @param runner
* @param wakeLockTime
* @param startId
* @return CK:BF:2777: returns whether service-shutdown will actually happen after the task has been executed (or has already been done).
*/
public boolean execute(Context context, final Runnable runner, int wakeLockTime, final Integer startId) {
TracingPowerManager pm = TracingPowerManager.getPowerManager(context);
final TracingWakeLock wakeLock = pm.newWakeLock(PowerManager.PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK, "CoreService execute");
wakeLock.setReferenceCounted(false);
wakeLock.acquire(wakeLockTime);
boolean serviceShutdownScheduled = false; // CK:BF:2777
final TracingWakeLock wakeLock = acquireWakeLock(context,"CoreService execute",wakeLockTime);
final boolean autoShutdown = mAutoShutdown;
Runnable myRunner = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
@ -107,11 +207,14 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
MessagingController.getInstance(getApplication()).systemStatusChanged();
}
} finally {
try { // CK:BF:2777:Making absolutely sure the service stopping command will be executed
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.d(K9.LOG_TAG, "CoreService (" + className + ") completed Runnable " + runner.hashCode() + " with startId " + startId);
wakeLock.release();
if (startId != null) {
stopSelf(startId);
} finally {
if (autoShutdown && startId != null) {
stopSelf(startId); // CK:BF:2777<-- this is what is meant with "serviceShutdownScheduled"; execution of this line assures proper shutdown of the service once finished
}
}
}
}
@ -121,12 +224,14 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
Log.e(K9.LOG_TAG, "CoreService.execute (" + className + ") called with no threadPool available; running Runnable " + runner.hashCode() + " in calling thread", new Throwable());
synchronized (this) {
myRunner.run();
serviceShutdownScheduled = startId != null; // CK:BF:2777; In this case it's not actually scheduled, it's already done, but that should never happen anyway
}
} else {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.d(K9.LOG_TAG, "CoreService (" + className + ") queueing Runnable " + runner.hashCode() + " with startId " + startId);
try {
threadPool.execute(myRunner);
serviceShutdownScheduled = startId != null; // CK:BF:2777
} catch (RejectedExecutionException e) {
if (!mShutdown) {
throw e;
@ -134,12 +239,23 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "CoreService: " + className + " is shutting down, ignoring rejected execution exception: " + e.getMessage());
}
}
mImmediateShutdown = !serviceShutdownScheduled; // CK:BF:2777
return serviceShutdownScheduled; // CK:BF:2777
}
/**
* CK:Added
* To implement by sub-class instead of overriding onStart.
* This allows CoreService to do start and end operations around the sub-class's start code.
* Especially, CoreService will protect the start-code with a wake-lock to guarantee the service to have the required resources to do it's work.
* CK:Q: Is this really useful (the wakelock part)? The real work is happening in the worker-thread anyway. Maybe it is because this makes sure that whatever needs to be started by the service, it can be without being interrupted by the phone going to sleep.
* @param intent
* @param startId
*/
public abstract void startService(Intent intent, int startId);
@Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent arg0) {
public IBinder onBind(@SuppressWarnings("unused") Intent intent) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
@ -158,4 +274,22 @@ public abstract class CoreService extends Service {
super.onDestroy();
// MessagingController.getInstance(getApplication()).removeListener(mListener);
}
/**
* CK:BF:2777
* @return True if auto-shutdown is enabled
*/
protected boolean isAutoShutdown() {
return mAutoShutdown;
}
/**
* CK:BF:2777
* Enable of disable auto-shutdown (enabled by default).
* See {@#mAutoShutdown} for more information.
* @param autoShutdown
*/
protected void setAutoShutdown(boolean autoShutdown) {
mAutoShutdown = autoShutdown;
}
}

View File

@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ import com.fsck.k9.helper.AutoSyncHelper;
import com.fsck.k9.mail.Pusher;
/**
* Bug-fix 2777:
* MailService was not properly shutting down when not needed anymore.
* Flawed shutdown logic has been removed and consolidated into CoreService
* as the auto-shutdown feature.
*/
public class MailService extends CoreService {
private static final String ACTION_CHECK_MAIL = "com.fsck.k9.intent.action.MAIL_SERVICE_WAKEUP";
@ -42,10 +46,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, MailService.class);
i.setAction(MailService.ACTION_RESET);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
if (wakeLockId == null) {
addWakeLock(context, i);
}
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, true);
context.startService(i);
}
@ -53,10 +54,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, MailService.class);
i.setAction(MailService.ACTION_RESTART_PUSHERS);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
if (wakeLockId == null) {
addWakeLock(context, i);
}
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, true);
context.startService(i);
}
@ -64,10 +62,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, MailService.class);
i.setAction(MailService.ACTION_RESCHEDULE_POLL);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
if (wakeLockId == null) {
addWakeLock(context, i);
}
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, true);
context.startService(i);
}
@ -75,7 +70,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, MailService.class);
i.setAction(MailService.ACTION_CANCEL);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, false); // CK:Q: why should we not create a wake lock if one is not already existing like for example in actionReschedulePoll?
context.startService(i);
}
@ -83,7 +78,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, MailService.class);
i.setAction(MailService.CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, false); // CK:Q: why should we not create a wake lock if one is not already existing like for example in actionReschedulePoll?
context.startService(i);
}
@ -96,7 +91,6 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
@Override
public void startService(Intent intent, int startId) {
Integer startIdObj = startId;
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
boolean oldIsSyncDisabled = isSyncDisabled();
@ -147,45 +141,33 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
if (ACTION_CHECK_MAIL.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "***** MailService *****: checking mail");
if (hasConnectivity && doBackground) {
PollService.startService(this);
}
reschedulePoll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startIdObj, false);
startIdObj = null;
reschedulePoll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId, false); // CK:BF:2777
} else if (ACTION_CANCEL.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.v(K9.LOG_TAG, "***** MailService *****: cancel");
cancel();
} else if (ACTION_RESET.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.v(K9.LOG_TAG, "***** MailService *****: reschedule");
rescheduleAll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startIdObj);
startIdObj = null;
rescheduleAll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId); // CK:BF:2777
} else if (ACTION_RESTART_PUSHERS.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.v(K9.LOG_TAG, "***** MailService *****: restarting pushers");
reschedulePushers(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startIdObj);
startIdObj = null;
reschedulePushers(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId); // CK:BF:2777
} else if (ACTION_RESCHEDULE_POLL.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.v(K9.LOG_TAG, "***** MailService *****: rescheduling poll");
reschedulePoll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startIdObj, true);
startIdObj = null;
reschedulePoll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId, true); // CK:BF:2777
} else if (ACTION_REFRESH_PUSHERS.equals(intent.getAction())) {
if (hasConnectivity && doBackground) {
refreshPushers(null);
schedulePushers(startIdObj);
startIdObj = null;
schedulePushers(startId); // CK:BF:2777
}
} else if (CONNECTIVITY_CHANGE.equals(intent.getAction())) {
rescheduleAll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startIdObj);
startIdObj = null;
rescheduleAll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId); // CK:BF:2777
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "Got connectivity action with hasConnectivity = " + hasConnectivity + ", doBackground = " + doBackground);
} else if (CANCEL_CONNECTIVITY_NOTICE.equals(intent.getAction())) {
@ -194,9 +176,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
MessagingController.getInstance(getApplication()).systemStatusChanged();
}
} finally {
if (startIdObj != null) {
stopSelf(startId);
}
/* nothing to do */
}
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "MailService.onStart took " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) + "ms");
@ -204,8 +184,7 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
private void rescheduleAll(final boolean hasConnectivity, final boolean doBackground, final Integer startId) {
reschedulePoll(hasConnectivity, doBackground, null, true);
reschedulePushers(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId);
reschedulePushers(hasConnectivity, doBackground, startId); // CK:BF:2777
}
@ -228,7 +207,6 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
private final static String LAST_CHECK_END = "MailService.lastCheckEnd";
public static void saveLastCheckEnd(Context context) {
long lastCheckEnd = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "Saving lastCheckEnd = " + new Date(lastCheckEnd));
@ -320,7 +298,6 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
private void reschedulePushers(final boolean hasConnectivity, final boolean doBackground, final Integer startId) {
execute(getApplication(), new Runnable() {
public void run() {
if (K9.DEBUG)
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "Rescheduling pushers");
stopPushers(null);
@ -330,7 +307,6 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
} else {
if (K9.DEBUG) {
Log.i(K9.LOG_TAG, "Not scheduling pushers: connectivity? " + hasConnectivity + " -- doBackground? " + doBackground);
}
}
@ -433,13 +409,11 @@ public class MailService extends CoreService {
@Override
public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) {
public IBinder onBind(@SuppressWarnings("unused") Intent intent) {
return null;
}
public static long getNextPollTime() {
return nextCheck;
}
}

View File

@ -27,10 +27,7 @@ public class RemoteControlService extends CoreService {
// Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClass(context, RemoteControlService.class);
i.setAction(RemoteControlService.SET_ACTION);
addWakeLockId(i, wakeLockId);
if (wakeLockId == null) {
addWakeLock(context, i);
}
addWakeLockId(context, i, wakeLockId, true);
context.startService(i);
}

View File

@ -114,12 +114,16 @@ public class SleepService extends CoreService {
@Override
public void startService(Intent intent, int startId) {
try {
if (intent.getAction().startsWith(ALARM_FIRED)) {
Integer id = intent.getIntExtra(LATCH_ID, -1);
endSleep(id);
}
}
finally {
stopSelf(startId);
}
}
private static class SleepDatum {
CountDownLatch latch;