mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/curl
synced 2024-11-10 11:35:07 -05:00
f636c12255
correct this problem within the nearest period
84 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
84 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
These are problems known to exist at the time of this release. Feel free to
|
|
join in and help us correct one or more of these! Also be sure to check the
|
|
changelog of the current development status, as one or more of these problems
|
|
may have been fixed since this was written!
|
|
|
|
* Running 'make test' on Mac OS X gives 4 errors. This seems to be related
|
|
to some kind of libtool problem:
|
|
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0029.html and
|
|
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0033.html
|
|
|
|
* libcurl does not deal nicely with files larger than 2GB
|
|
|
|
* GOPHER transfers seem broken
|
|
|
|
* If a HTTP server responds to a HEAD request and includes a body (thus
|
|
violating the RFC2616), curl won't wait to read the response but just stop
|
|
reading and return back. If a second request (let's assume a GET) is then
|
|
immediately made to the same server again, the connection will be re-used
|
|
fine of course, and the second request will be sent off but when the
|
|
response is to get read, the previous response-body is what curl will read
|
|
and havoc is what happens.
|
|
More details on this is found in this libcurl mailing list thread:
|
|
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-08/0000.html
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Q: My program blows up when I run lots of curl_easy_perform() calls on a
|
|
single thread
|
|
Q: My program dies when a single thread re-enters the win32 select() call
|
|
via curl_easy_perform()
|
|
Q: --- add your own flavour here ---
|
|
|
|
Single Threaded Re-Entracy
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
There is a glitch / trick to using cURL on Win32 related to re-entrancy.
|
|
This experience was gained on verion 7.9.4 using Windows NT SP3 in a banking
|
|
environment (just in case you wanted to know).
|
|
|
|
If you have already called curl_easy_perform(), and *somehow* you cause your
|
|
single thread of execution to make another call to curl_easy_perform() - the
|
|
windows socket() call used to create a new socket for the second connection
|
|
can return with 10044 / 10043 error codes.
|
|
|
|
The WSA errors we experienced are:
|
|
WSAEPROTONOSUPPORT
|
|
(10043)
|
|
Protocol not supported.
|
|
The requested protocol has not been configured into the system, or no
|
|
implementation for it exists. For example, a socket call requests a
|
|
SOCK_DGRAM socket, but specifies a stream protocol.
|
|
|
|
WSAESOCKTNOSUPPORT
|
|
(10044)
|
|
Socket type not supported.
|
|
The support for the specified socket type does not exist in this address
|
|
family. For example, the optional type SOCK_RAW might be selected in a
|
|
socket call, and the implementation does not support SOCK_RAW sockets at
|
|
all.
|
|
|
|
We have experienced this by creating a timer that ticks every 20ms, and on
|
|
the tick making a curl_easy_perform() call. The call usually completed in
|
|
about 300ms. And we expected (before this test) that the timer would NOT be
|
|
fired during a call to curl_easy_perform(), howvever, while the first
|
|
curl_easy_perform() is running a tick *is* fired by the windows API somehow,
|
|
and we then call curl_easy_perform() again - thus single threaded
|
|
re-entrancy is achieved.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
* We made sure that a new CURL structure was being used for each
|
|
curl_easy_perform() request, and that the curl_global_init() had been called
|
|
beforehand.
|
|
* I'm happy to answer any questions about this problem to try to track it
|
|
down.
|
|
* Once the socket() call started failing, there is no hope - it never works
|
|
again.
|
|
* Slowing the timer down to give each request enough time to complete solves
|
|
this problem completely.
|
|
|
|
If anyone has the source code to the WinNT implementation of socket() and
|
|
can figure out WHY this can occur, more tracing can be performed.
|
|
|
|
John Clayton <John.Clayton at barclayscapital.com>
|