Reported by the new script 'scripts/copyright.pl'. The script has a
regex whitelist for the files that don't need copyright headers.
Removed three (mostly usesless) README files from docs/
Closes#5141
The regexp looking for assignments within conditions was too greedy
and matched a too long string in the case of multiple conditionals
on the same line. This is basically only a problem in single line
macros, and the code which exemplified this was essentially:
do { if((x) != NULL) { x = NULL; } } while(0)
..where the final parenthesis of while(0) matched the regexp, and
the legal assignment in the block triggered the warning. Fix by
making the regexp less greedy by matching for the tell-tale signs
of the if statement ending.
Also remove the one occurrence where the warning was disabled due
to a construction like the above, where the warning didn't apply
when fixed.
Closes#4647
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Consider a modified file to be committed this year.
- Make the travis CHECKSRC also do COPYRIGHTYEAR scan in examples and
includes
- Ignore 0 parents when getting latest commit date of file.
since in the CI we're dealing with a truncated repo of last 50 commits,
the file's most recent commit may not be available. when this happens
git log and rev-list show the initial commit (ie first commit not to be
truncated) but that's incorrect so ignore it.
Ref: https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/4547
Closes https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/4549
Co-authored-by: Jay Satiro
Forgetting to bump the year in the copyright clause when hacking has
been quite common among curl developers, but a traditional checksrc
check isn't a good fit as it would penalize anyone hacking on January
1st (among other things). This adds a more selective COPYRIGHTYEAR
check which intends to only cover the currently hacked on changeset.
The check for updated copyright year is currently not enforced on all
files but only on files edited and/or committed locally. This is due to
the amount of files which aren't updated with their correct copyright
year at the time of their respective commit.
To further avoid running this expensive check for every developer, it
adds a new local override mode for checksrc where a .checksrc file can
be used to turn on extended warnings locally.
Closes#3303
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
If a !checksrc! disable command specified to ignore zero errors, it was
still added to the ignore block even though nothing was ignored. While
there were no blocks ignored that shouldn't be ignored, the processing
ended with with a warning:
<filename>:<line>:<col>: warning: Unused ignore: LONGLINE (UNUSEDIGNORE)
/* !checksrc! disable LONGLINE 0 */
^
Fix by instead treating a zero ignore as a a badcommand and throw a
warning for that one.
Closes#3096
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Enable strict and warnings mode for checksrc to ensure we aren't missing
anything due to bugs in the checking code. This uncovered a few things
which are all fixed in this commit:
* several variables were used uninitialized
* several variables were not defined in the correct scope
* the whitelist filehandle was read even if the file didn't exist
* the enable_warn() call when a disable counter had expired was passing
incorrect variables, but since the checkwarn() call is unlikely to hit
(the counter is only decremented to zero on actual ignores) it didn't
manifest a problem.
Closes#3090
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Raad <Marcel.Raad@teamviewer.com>
This extends the INDENTATION case to also handle 'else' statements
and require proper indentation on the following line. Also fixes the
offending cases found in the codebase.
Closes#2532
... but output non-stripped version of the line, even if that then can
make the script identify the wrong position in the line at
times. Showing the line stripped (ie without comments) is just too
surprising.
Follow-up to e8423f9ce1 with discussionis in
https://github.com/bagder/curl/pull/258
This check scans for fopen() with a mode string without 'b' present, as
it may indicate that an FOPEN_* define should rather be used.
The list of unsafe functions currently consists of sprintf, vsprintf,
strcat, strncat and gets.
Subsequently, some existing code needed updating to avoid warnings on
this.
