With many easy handles using the same connection for multiplexing, it is
important we store and keep the transfer-oriented stuff in the
SessionHandle so that callbacks and callback data work fine even when
many easy handles share the same physical connection.
.. also make __func__ replacement in multi.
Prior to this change debug builds would fail to build if the compiler
was building pre-c99 and didn't support __func__.
to allow code to act differently on the situation.
Also added some more info message for the connection re-use function to
make it clearer when connections are not re-used.
All the existing Curl_bundle* functions were only ever used from within
the conncache.c file, so I moved them over and made them static (and
removed the Curl_ prefix).
This avoids unnecessary dynamic allocs and as this also removed the last
users of *hash_alloc() and *hash_destroy(), those two functions are now
removed.
If the handle removed from the multi handle happens to be the one
"owning" the pipeline other transfers will be waiting indefinitely. Now
we move such handles back to connect to have them race (again) for
getting the connection and thus avoid hanging.
Bug: http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1465
Reported-by: Jiri Dvorak
... even if they don't have an associated connection anymore. It could
leave the waiting transfers pending with no active one on the
connection.
Bug: http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1465
Reported-by: Jiri Dvorak
Since we just started make use of free(NULL) in order to simplify code,
this change takes it a step further and:
- converts lots of Curl_safefree() calls to good old free()
- makes Curl_safefree() not check the pointer before free()
The (new) rule of thumb is: if you really want a function call that
frees a pointer and then assigns it to NULL, then use Curl_safefree().
But we will prefer just using free() from now on.
The function "free" is documented in the way that no action shall occur for
a passed null pointer. It is therefore not needed that a function caller
repeats a corresponding check.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18775608/free-a-null-pointer-anyway-or-check-first
This issue was fixed by using the software Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc24.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
The code used some happy eyeballs logic even _after_ CONNECT has been
sent to a proxy, while the happy eyeball phase is already (should be)
over by then.
This is solved by splitting the multi state into two separate states
introducing the new SENDPROTOCONNECT state.
Bug: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2015-01/0170.html
Reported-by: Peter Laser
Since 1342a96ecf, a timeout detected in the multi state machine didn't
necesarily clear everything up, like formpost data.
Bug: https://github.com/bagder/curl/issues/147
Reported-by: Michel Promonet
Patched-by: Michel Promonet
When the connection code decides to close a socket it informs the multi
system via the Curl_multi_closed function. The multi system may, in
turn, invoke the CURLMOPT_SOCKETFUNCTION function with
CURL_POLL_REMOVE. This happens after the socket has already been
closed. Reorder the code so that CURL_POLL_REMOVE is called before the
socket is closed.
Debug output 'typo' fix.
Don't print an extra "0x" in
* Pipe broke: handle 0x0x2546d88, url = /
Add debug output.
Print the number of connections in the connection cache when
adding one, and not only when one is removed.
Fix typos in comments.
... for the local variable name in functions holding the return
code. Using the same name universally makes code easier to read and
follow.
Also, unify code for checking for CURLcode errors with:
if(result) or if(!result)
instead of
if(result == CURLE_OK), if(CURLE_OK == result) or if(result != CURLE_OK)
Coverify CID 1157776. Removed a superfluous if() that always evaluated
true (and an else clause that never ran), and then re-indented the
function accordingly.
As the current element in the list is free()d by Curl_llist_remove(),
when the associated connection is pending, reworked the loop to avoid
accessing the next element through e->next afterward.
... as the struct is free()d in the end anyway. It was first pointed out
to me that one of the ->msglist assignments were supposed to have been
->pending but was a copy and paste mistake when I realized none of the
clearing of pointers had to be there.
