warning C4701: potentially uninitialized local variable 'size' used
Technically this can't happen, as the usage of 'size' is protected by
'if(parsed)' and 'parsed' is only set after 'size' has been parsed.
Anyway, lets keep the compiler happy.
Since gcc 5, the processor output can get split up on multiple lines
that made the configure script fail to figure out values from
definitions. The fix is to use cpp -P, and this fix now first checks if
cpp -P is necessary and then if cpp -P works before it uses that to
extract defined values.
Fixes#719
formdata.c:390: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
Introduced in commit ca5f9341ef this happens because a char*, which is
32-bits wide in 32-bit land, is being cast to a curl_off_t which is
64-bits wide where 64-bit integers are supported by the compiler.
This doesn't happen in 64-bit land as a pointer is the same size as a
curl_off_t.
This fix doesn't address the fact that a 64-bit value cannot be used
for CURLFORM_CONTENTLEN when set in a form array and compiled on a
32-bit platforms, it does at least suppress the compilation warning.
... to allow users to see which specfic wildcard that matched when such
is used.
Also minor logic cleanup to simplify the code, and I removed all tabs
from verbose strings.
Simplify the code by using a single entry that looks for a socket in the
socket hash. As indicated in #712, the code looked for CURL_SOCKET_BAD
at some point and that is ineffective/wrong and this makes it easier to
avoid that.
... as it implies we need to check for that on all the other variable
references as well (as Coverity otherwise warns us for missing NULL
checks), and we're alredy making sure that the pointer is never NULL.
RFC 6265 section 4.1.1 spells out that the first name/value pair in the
header is the actual cookie name and content, while the following are
the parameters.
libcurl previously had a more liberal approach which causes significant
problems when introducing new cookie parameters, like the suggested new
cookie priority draft.
The previous logic read all n/v pairs from left-to-right and the first
name used that wassn't a known parameter name would be used as the
cookie name, thus accepting "Set-Cookie: Max-Age=2; person=daniel" to be
a cookie named 'person' while an RFC 6265 compliant parser should
consider that to be a cookie named 'Max-Age' with an (unknown) parameter
'person'.
Fixes#709
