mirror of
https://github.com/moparisthebest/curl
synced 2024-12-21 23:58:49 -05:00
softened my opinions, added API benefit - Thanks to Eric Cooper
This commit is contained in:
parent
0177ed6f03
commit
e0785ade35
@ -87,11 +87,7 @@ The Better License, Original BSD or LGPL?
|
||||
|
||||
It isn't obvious or without debate to any objective interested party that
|
||||
either of these licenses are the "better" or even the "preferred" one in a
|
||||
generic situation. In the Debian camp they frawn upon OpenSSL's BSD license,
|
||||
but that seems to merely stem from the general FSF friendliness and GPL
|
||||
bigotry than based on a sane and proper analysis (assuming such a one is even
|
||||
possible within an area as filled with religion and personal preferences such
|
||||
as this). This is however not a subject suitable for this document.
|
||||
generic situation.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, I think we should accept the fact that the SSL/TLS libraries and
|
||||
their different licenses will fit different applications and their authors
|
||||
@ -157,6 +153,9 @@ Fixing the Only Problem
|
||||
|
||||
This concept works equally well both for shared and static libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
A positive side effect of this approach could be a more generic "de facto"
|
||||
standard API for SSL/TLS libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
When Will This Happen
|
||||
|
||||
Note again that this is not a problem in curl, it doesn't solve any actual
|
||||
@ -181,3 +180,7 @@ Footnotes
|
||||
[6] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html end of section 3
|
||||
[7] = http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/lgpl.html
|
||||
[8] = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL_exception
|
||||
|
||||
Feedback/Updates provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Eric Cooper
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user