From f1a223473d660b7234236e6af7d2582c2fdd6717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wizzup? <Wizzup?@3f818213-9676-44b0-a9b4-5e4c4e03d09d>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:14:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] DTM shell with some comments.

git-svn-id: http://www.villavu.com/repositories/merlijn/mufasa@75 3f818213-9676-44b0-a9b4-5e4c4e03d09d
---
 Units/MMLCore/client.pas |  6 ++++-
 Units/MMLCore/dtm.pas    | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Units/MMLCore/dtm.pas

diff --git a/Units/MMLCore/client.pas b/Units/MMLCore/client.pas
index 84bb6e4..51813ae 100644
--- a/Units/MMLCore/client.pas
+++ b/Units/MMLCore/client.pas
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ unit Client;
 interface
 
 uses
-  Classes, SysUtils, MufasaTypes, Window, Input, Files, Finder,Bitmaps;
+  Classes, SysUtils, MufasaTypes, Window, Input, Files, Finder, Bitmaps, dtm;
 
 type
     TClient = class(TObject)
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ type
             MFiles: TMFiles;
             MFinder: TMFinder;
             MBitmaps : TMBitmaps;
+            MDTM: TMDTM;
 
     end;
 
@@ -33,10 +34,12 @@ begin
   MFiles := TMFiles.Create;
   MFinder := TMFinder.Create(Self);
   MBitmaps := TMBitmaps.Create(self);
+  MDTM := MDTM.Create(self);
 end;
 
 destructor TClient.Destroy;
 begin
+  MDTM.Free;
   MBitmaps.Free;
   MFinder.Free;
   MFiles.Free;
@@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ begin
   MWindow.Free;
 
 
+
   inherited;
 end;
 
diff --git a/Units/MMLCore/dtm.pas b/Units/MMLCore/dtm.pas
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..766dd95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Units/MMLCore/dtm.pas
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+unit dtm;
+
+{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
+
+interface
+
+uses
+  Classes, SysUtils;
+
+type
+    TMDTM = class(TObject)
+          constructor Create(Owner: TObject);
+          destructor Destroy; override;
+    private
+           Client: TObject;
+
+    end;
+
+{
+ I am not sure wether I should simply copy and paste the old DTM implementation,
+ or rewrite it from scratch.
+
+ I recall there was something partially wrong with SCAR-alike DTM conversions
+ to Mufasa DTM's...
+
+ The old DTM system problaby doesn't perform that well, but seems to be quite
+ stable and complete.
+
+ If I would rewrite it from scratch, it would probably be faster, and
+ hopefully more efficient.That won't be too hard, especially since I have
+ direct data access now. (TClient FTW!)
+
+ Rewrite from scratch it will be, I guess.
+ And AreaShape will be turned into a {$I }, inline simply doesn't cut it.
+
+ ~Wizz
+}
+
+implementation
+uses
+    Client;
+
+constructor TMDTM.Create(Owner: TObject);
+begin
+  inherited Create;
+  Self.Client := Owner;
+end;
+
+destructor TMDTM.Destroy;
+
+begin
+  //Something
+  inherited Destroy;
+end;
+
+end.
+